It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Al-Qaeda, a Secret Service Operation?

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 16 2005 @ 11:51 AM
link   
Turkish intelligence specialists agree that there is no such organization as al-Qaeda. Rather, Al-Qaeda is the name of a secret service operation.



The concept “fighting terror” is the background of the “low-intensity-warfare” conducted in the mono-polar world order. The subject of this strategy of tension is named as “al-Qaeda.”

Sakra, the fifth most senior man in Osama bin Ladin’s al-Qaeda that has challenged the whole world from a base in the Afghan mountains, is in the hands of Turkish Justice. Sakra has been sought by the secret services since 2000. The US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) interrogated him twice before. Following the interrogation CIA offered him employment. He also received a large sum of money by CIA. However the CIA eventually lost contact with him. Following this development, in 2000 the CIA passed intelligence about Sakra through a classified notice to Turkey, calling for the Turkish National Security Organization (MIT) to capture him. MIT caught Sakra in Turkey and interrogated him. Sakra’s protests that, “MIT abducted my wife and interrogated her for 20 days,” as he was brought to Besiktas court in Istanbul for sentencing, seem to confirm these claims.

Sakra was sought and caught by Syrian al-Mukhabarat as well. Syria too offered him employment. Sakra eventually became a triple agent for the secret services.

Source:
Zaman Daily News

I wonder how many Tripple Agents actually are in Al-Qaeda.

Or maybe Al-Qaeda itself is a Tripple-Agency.

Connections between Al-Qaeda and US Intelligence Agencies are not Few...

Related Thread:

American Contact for Bin Laden Working for Iraqi Ministry?



posted on Aug, 16 2005 @ 11:53 AM
link   
I would have but i didnt want to deal with the DG bashing today.


Let the fun begin.



posted on Aug, 16 2005 @ 12:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by dgtempe
I would have but i didnt want to deal with the DG bashing today.


Let the fun begin.

Excuse me, but what's "DG"?



Deutsche Grammophon?



[edit on 16/8/05 by Souljah]



posted on Aug, 16 2005 @ 04:06 PM
link   
Haven't we been through all this before Souljah?

Many times in fact...



Quick review:
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...


Anyway, dg you have my vote this month.....

...for best Avatar. Please keep it




posted on Aug, 16 2005 @ 04:15 PM
link   
souljah, dg as in dgtempe, and how can anyone bash you with such a pretty avatar



posted on Aug, 16 2005 @ 10:09 PM
link   
I still don't see how the Secret Service is behind all this. i'm not sure i totally understand you. your title says it's the secret service, but i find nothing in anything you posted that says it is. only CIA, so can you please make this connection?



posted on Aug, 17 2005 @ 03:05 AM
link   
I concur. Plus, terrorism wouldnt be the Secret Service's jurisdiction. The only time the Secret Service ever have jurisdiction abroad is when they are protecting foreign leaders. Plus, the Secret Service doesn't have the weaponry, or money, to finance Al-Qaeda. USSS uses MP5 and Uzis - wheres Al-Qaeda prefer AK-47s. If the USSS were behind it, Al-Qaeda would use these weapons (which are freely available on the black market, so Al-Qaeda could have had them).



posted on Aug, 17 2005 @ 04:01 AM
link   
Little side note.

Too the US folks, Secret service means the presidents bodyguards basically.

Too the rest of world its means generally any Specialist division/Unit(often press in the USA refer to our FBI/CIA(Mi5/Mi6) as british secret service, thats why the reports says the CIA, as the CIA to many in the rest of world is a secret service.

Hoped that helped.



posted on Aug, 17 2005 @ 04:16 AM
link   
I just thought I would reply to this thread for the purpose of displaying my signature line...



posted on Aug, 17 2005 @ 07:24 AM
link   
Al-qeada was named after 'the camp', where all the extremiststrained, no?

This sounds like is that the CIA attempted to gain information on OBL and paid this guys some money. Call it a bribe, reward, whatever. He was playing both sides of the fence. I mean, how the hell can you trust someone who is selling out his 'own' country. Use a little common sense. They should have killed him when they had the chance.



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join