It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by spliff4020
Communits work for the good of the country. Not the praise of "allah"
Originally posted by subz
There is zero chances of these parties becoming the dominant party in our country. The demographics speak for themselves, 1.8 million muslims will not provide the majority needed to form government.
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
mhmm.
Does any of this ring a bell anyone?
It's only a matter of time before they start putting muslims in concentration camps.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Just for further clarification on this, would one of those parties being considered for banning be the Muslim Association of Britain?
Anyone know?
Seekerof
Originally posted by intelgurl
This is certainly an interesting development in the UK...
Excuse me for my ignorance - I don't keep up with British politics, but I thought Blair was a liberal, am I wrong?
Originally posted by subz
(snipped)
Also would you prefer that these mudjahadin continue with their violent struggle rather than through peaceful political means? After all, these political parties have committed no crime. Tony Blair has no justification for shutting down political parties. He never shut down Sinn Fein and look how that situation panned out.
I would much rather we continue to root out violent terrorists and preachers of hate BUT allow them a peaceful political alternative. That way the disenfranchised can consider going to these peaceful political parties or to the terrorists.
(snipped)
[edit on 7/8/05 by subz]
Originally posted by hands
(snipped)
What is it?
Originally posted by hands
Originally posted by subz
(snipped)
Also would you prefer that these mudjahadin continue with their violent struggle rather than through peaceful political means? After all, these political parties have committed no crime. Tony Blair has no justification for shutting down political parties. He never shut down Sinn Fein and look how that situation panned out.
I would much rather we continue to root out violent terrorists and preachers of hate BUT allow them a peaceful political alternative. That way the disenfranchised can consider going to these peaceful political parties or to the terrorists.
(snipped)
[edit on 7/8/05 by subz]
Trying again!
Subz,
But what purpose do these political parties serve? What is their raison d'etre?
The purpose of Sinn Fein / IRA has always been clear to me (whether or not I agree with them doesn't matter - their reason for existence wasn't as fuzzy as I find these islamic parties) but the reason for the existence for these political parties isn't.
Is it purely a matter for arguing for a change to foreign policy - why can't they engage with exisiting political parties for that? Not everyone in the Labour, Conservative or Liberal Democrat parties takes the party line. Or is it something more fundamental about the nature of our society they want to change?
What is it?