It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I told them that I'd better go now and to come back another time (another big mistake). They asked when, and just to get them off my back I said in 3 weeks. They came back to my door in 3 weeks exactly to the minute. I looked out a window very carefully and it was them.
Originally posted by smallpeeps
Not evil, but surely hypocritical. They'll wake YOU up because you need Jehovah. Your neighbor who's a JW, however, gets to sleep in because he's already down with Jehovah.
Originally posted by edsingera bunch of ballyhoo
Merci! I have had many, hope you have also.
Have a nice day!
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
If you think God has no sense of humor, I'll send you a copy of my auto-biography.
Originally posted by SomewhereinBetween
. Sumeria is not, and I repeat, is not a civilization proven to be older than that of the Egyptians. Secondly, even if it was, it has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that Jews hailed from Egypt and created the faith Jehovah of your Jesus. The Lady of Warka found in Baghdad and dated to 3200BCE is currently among the oldest. It was surmised that Sumeria is older, however even the first year archaeological student will roll their eyes at that proposition were it made today.
I cannot help what you wish to pretend does not exist. I posted information that you cannot counter:
Originally posted by edsinger
Well that is not the case, the Pre-Flood Euphrates valley was the starting point for civilization not the Nile Valley. Now if you choose to believe otherwise then fine, your choice but your premise of Hebrew from Egyptian is complete poop.
The Egyptian Badarian period dating to 5500BCE, or the dynasty archaeologists were forced by virtue of their error to number as ‘zero,’ is after I do the math for you, 7,500 years old. In fact, singer, that was until 30 years ago when Nabtan Playa dating to 9,000 BCE was discovered, and within the last two years those excavations show that they were already herding 4,500 years before Abraham. Your Sumerian history dates no older than 4,000 BCE at best. Further, Singer, the evidence of trade with Babylon has been found in Abydos dating back as far as 4,000BCE.
Oh it rings many bells. How many bells shall I name for you?
PS...UR ring a bell?
At least you have agreed that your Bible lied to you by stating:
Originally posted by edsinger
Well this is interesting indeed. Of course Abram was not from Caldea, but Sumer. You state that Egypt predates it. I remain unconvinced but back to Ur anyway,
But one step at a time, at least you have found yourself so confused that you actuay endorse my claim. Your second step is still to explain how Abe managed to go south from Bethel into Egypt and siuth fom there into Bethel. For that answer I will keep you perplexed until that is exposed by me.
The Biblical expression, "Ur of the Chaldees," although used by the great excavator of Ur, C. Leonard Woolley, for the title of a book about the city (Norton Library, 1965), is extremely anachronistic and misleading. Ur was originally a city of the Sumerians, not of the Chaldeans. The latter were actually Aramaeans, who did not appear in Mesopotamia until nearly a thousand years after the end of the Sumerians as a distinct linguistic community. The Chaldeans dominated Mesopotamia in the "Neo-Babylonian" Period, not only long after the Sumerians but also long after any reasonable date for Abraham -- if Abraham came from "Ur of the Chaldees," this must be a different Ur, ...
What exactly does this have to do with your good book lying? I would appreciate your satying on topic.
Now thats all fine and dandy, but I wonder since both of these ancient civilizations were knowledgeable in Astronomy, can you explain this?
How many times must I repeat for you, the oldest artifact you can find in Summeria does not outdate that of Egypt, nor does it outdate the findings of that little old calendar in the Egyptian desert pointing toward Sirius. And how many times previously have I provided that Chaldean rule was what gave rise to Sumerian history? To add to your dilemma, I am going to toss in; Ur-the name of Ra's ship, and : Uatch-Ur- The Mediterranean. The more you learn, the more the cocoon is stripped from obscuring your vision.
But yet we bring Egypt back into this and it would seem that Sumer is yet again older,
Written in what, script? This proves something I suppose, that man was born with stylus in hand? Even your Moses supposedly relied on your religious constitution to be inscribed in stone, not once, but twice! What does that tell you? It tells you that caveman drawings came first.
The oldest written tablets were Sumerian, dating back to 3500 B.C.
Wrong! Cuneiform is the earliest known script as of today, however it originated from pictographs of a certain type, where, those pictographs hail from a people who have been knocked off the oldest pedestal which I note you cannot refute, and worse, it is now offered that these very same Sumerians are not as old as even the Germanic race, much less the Egyptians.
The oldest writing is pictographic Sumerian, inscribed on tablets in the Near East. The oldest of these tablets have been dated at about 3500 B.C. and were found in the Sumerian temple of Inanna.
I can sense your desperation now as you find a need to venture 7 thousand years into the future.
The earliest Western-type script was the proto-Sinaitic, which appeared in the Sinai Peninsula about 1550 B.C. ..
Once more, you mean script.
The Sumerians were the first people with written records in the region of greater Babylonia.
And by God, you had to reach back 48 years to find this drivel, it is as though science and archaeology stood still for you.
"The dates of Sumer's early history have always been surrounded with uncertainty."—*S.N. Kramer, "The Sumerians," in Scientific American, October 1957, p. 72.
Originally posted by SomewhereinBetween
At least you have agreed that your Bible lied to you by stating:
Originally posted by edsinger
Well this is interesting indeed. Of course Abram was not from Caldea, but Sumer. You state that Egypt predates it. I remain unconvinced but back to Ur anyway,
1) That Abram was not Chaldean.
Originally posted by smallpeeps
The "New World" translation of the bible should be viewed for what it is. It is not designed to lead one to a true understanding of Christ's message. You'll need to put down the books and meditate if you want the truth. Books alone won't get you there.
I think Egyptians knew this, but what was Abraham's problem? Why was it all about him and his seed?
What covenant thing would that be exactly, singer? The one where God supposedly decides that he would be quite willing to annihilate all of his other creatins whom he supposedly loved, in favour of Abe's tribe?
Originally posted by edsingerGee that does not seem to be what the Book says. And as for the seed, it was that covenant thing that concerned ol Abram.
edsinger said:
Gee that does not seem to be what the Book says. And as for the seed, it was that covenant thing that concerned ol Abram.
[...]
And the covenant was with Abraham and his seed, the chosen seed, Issac..........
en.wikipedia.org...
Eisenhower's family originally belonged to the local River Brethren sect of the Mennonites. However, when Ike was five years old, his parents became followers of the WatchTower Society, whose members later took the name Jehovah's Witnesses. The Eisenhower home served as the local WatchTower meeting Hall from 1896 to 1915, when Eisenhower's father stopped regularly associating due to the WatchTower's failed prophesies that Armageddon would occur in October 1914 and 1915. Ike's father received a WatchTower funeral when he died in the 1940s. Ike and his brothers also stopped associating regularly after 1915, but Ike's mother continued as an active Jehovah's Witness until her death. Ike enjoyed a close relationship with his mother throughout their lifetimes, and he even used a WatchTower printed Bible for his second Presidential Inauguration. In later years, Eisenhower was baptized, confirmed, and became a communicant in the Presbyterian church in a single ceremony on February 1, 1953, just weeks after his first inauguration as president.