It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Plumbo
Why does nasa gets billions of $$$?
People like being lied to, they just don't realize it.
People want to trust the words of other people in higher authority.
There is a denial mechanism embedded in each one of us. We feel insecure. Not sure what the future holds, what catastrophic event may occur. However, there is an ultimate demise to the one trusting in other men/women. Jeremiah 17:5 curses the man who trusts in man.
There also is an evil force in this world. It is governed by the being the bible calls Lucifer. According to Isaiah 14, it is Lucifer's desire to be like his Creator, to take his place. However, His Creator kicked him out of his Presence. So, this Lucifer and his associates influence the minds of the men in power who have sold their souls for this power.
But God is right there, in the heart of the earth, literally speaking. He hides behind the veiled curtain of the celestial sphere. He's covered with dark waters and thick clouds. Lucifer's control on the minds of this world has people everywhere believing the lie that the universe is an infinite realm and ther is no physical, bodily presence of any sort of Creator. He uses the "sciences" to back this claim. And yet, God is right there, no less than 4,000 miles away.
The world will eventually know the truth about this.
One way or another.
Once this happens, nasa and all governing agencies that have supported this global lie will be shamefully defeated.
-sjc
Here's my next assholey reply.
You have no idea what you are talking about so I will ignore all your future post.
By spin-off of course you mean the theft of someone's patent with a slight change.
Originally posted by Lanotom
By spin-off of course you mean the theft of someone's patent with a slight change.[/QUOTE]
Actually, no.
My spouse works for a high tech company and a number of people hold patents there. The government does contract them to develop ideas and after a certain time period they are allowed to sell the patent commercially. Some that I know specifically about include the Cadillac's "heads up night vision" display system. The patent holders got money from the government to develop this for tanks and then when the agreement was over, they sold a nonmilitary version of it to various manufacturers.
The government also gives grant money for scientists to develop applications (National Science Foundation.) There's a number of them available for robotics designers and, of course, you can sell your research to the government if you like.
The engineering world isn't quite as simple as it's made out to be. A few good patents sold for space/military applications that can be resold to the public have made any number of engineers relatively wealthy.
(which is why, if I had any sense and high level math skills, I'd run off to be a PhD engineer. But I don't, and I don't, so I can't.)
Originally posted by T_Jesus
Sometimes I wish some of you could question Mike Griffin...he'd love you.
There are alot of things we've invented that come from the space program, either there or a spin-off. My least favorite happens to be Tang, I can't stand the stuff
Originally posted by Byrd
Last warning -- KEEP IT CIVIL!
Originally posted by Byrd
No kidding!
It has, to be fair, improved from the first days. And I kinda like the freeze-dried ice cream (so I'm weird!)
I also like the little solar blankets. And aren't the folding windowshades for your car something that developed because of this heat shielding technology? (you know the ones; you get them unfolded and they spring apart and then it's like wrestling a python to get them back in the proper configuration to put away)
Originally posted by Lanotom
Yes I'm sorry. I should never follow one's lead when it comes to profanity.
I'm above that and for my repeating the word I'm sorry.
Originally posted by T_Jesus
(3) We have gone to the moon a few times after the original. We stopped progress because of politics, and because robotic missions were more efficient.
Excuse me Jesus, when exactly have we gone to the moon since the original?
Originally posted by Lastday Prophet
I can keep this very simple, this is why I consider it to be a "HOAX"
If they really went to the moon in 1969, all they had to do is make an "EXACT DUPLICATE" of that Spacecraft and they would not have the problems they are having now, 35 years later.
Originally posted by dollmonster
(3) We have gone to the moon a few times after the original. We stopped progress because of politics, and because robotic missions were more efficient.
Excuse me Jesus, when exactly have we gone to the moon since the original?
Originally posted by Lifeadventurer
If NASa hadn't "stolen" and "improved" on inventions, would they be half as commercialized or efficient as they are now? Would they be used for the purposes they are used for now?
[edit on 7/31/2005 by Lifeadventurer]