It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Facing severe budget pressures, the Pentagon is developing plans to slash the Air Force's two prized fighter jet programs, according to Defense Department officials and outside experts. Military planners are debating options to scale back the Air Force's F 35 Joint Strike Fighter and the stealth F/A 22 fighter, as some defense officials question spending billions on weapons that have little use against terrorist networks and other unconventional threats. Such a move would be an enormous blow to the Air Force, which has spent years developing the two weapons to replace its aging fleet of fighter jets. The budget cuts could encounter fierce resistance from lawmakers, including some from California, whose districts would be hit hard by the economic repercussions.
L.A Times
Originally posted by NWguy83
Old news, Raptor has alrady been cut down to 179. And I've already said a few times on this website that the DoD was considering cutting hundreds of JSF.
Originally posted by NWguy83
I am against cutting back the number of Raptors, because air supremecy is key. However, I am for cuting back the number of JSF. Why have 1,500 $45million - $55million JSF when you can have 1,000 JSF and 500 $20million X-45C ...
Originally posted by jetsetter
The F-35 will not be cut much. Remeber that they wanted to cut the Kittyhawk?. That did not happen. The cuts have to be aprroved by congress.
WASHINGTON, Aug 29 (Reuters) - U.S. Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. John Jumper on Monday said arguments for restoring some Lockheed Martin Corp. (LMT.N: Quote, Profile, Research) F/A-22 fighter jets cut from the Pentagon's 2006 budget were "making sense" to military planners.
"Quite frankly, I don't think the number's going to stay the same. I think we're making good arguments for why we need this airplane," Jumper told reporters at a final roundtable before he hands over the reins as the Air Force's top uniformed officer to Gen. Michael Moseley on Friday.
"The capability, I don't think, is being questioned any more, just the size" of the order, Jumper said, when asked about the F/A-22's fate in a once-every-four-years review of defense programs under way at the Pentagon. "I think our arguments are making sense."
Originally posted by nullster
Irregardless of the future " 20 year Unknowns", the current military situation in Iraq and near future conflicts will presumably exclude the need for such advanced tactical fighters. With military base closures looming and the huge financial crisis the US, few if any politicians have the leverage to bolster JSF or Raptor numbers.
Originally posted by nullster
Irregardless of the future " 20 year Unknowns", the current military situation in Iraq and near future conflicts will presumably exclude the need for such advanced tactical fighters. With military base closures looming and the huge financial crisis the US, few if any politicians have the leverage to bolster JSF or Raptor numbers.