It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by warthog911
The only way to build the temple is to destroy the dome of rock if i remeber the name and that would mean to destroy Israel and that would mean to wage WW3.
ps: whats the diff btw masons and fremasons?
Originally posted by warthog911
Well i thought the aim of masons was to build the king solomons temple.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
The people who want to build a third temple are mainly fundamentalist Jews and a small number of fundamentalist Christians.
Originally posted by mrfixit
It's been awhile and I can't remember the details, but Biblically [ according to Bible prophecy] aren't the Jews supposed to rebuild the Temple sometime during or after the tribulations?
Originally posted by Driver
They couldent re-build it since Hiram Abiff (the main architect) had been killed for not revealing the secrets of Freemasonry to the 3 Hyksos people unders order from Apophis to extract the "Horus ritual" information to ensure his afterlife.
Originally posted by senrak
Originally posted by Driver
They couldent re-build it since Hiram Abiff (the main architect) had been killed for not revealing the secrets of Freemasonry to the 3 Hyksos people unders order from Apophis to extract the "Horus ritual" information to ensure his afterlife.
Driver,
Does that post actually MEAN anything or were you drinking when you typed it?
Originally posted by Driver
Why isent that true?
I'm halfway through "The Hiram Key" and I'm sure it says that.
Originally posted by Tamahu
Temple of Solomon.
Soul of Man or Solar-Man
Originally posted by senrak
Originally posted by Driver
Why isent that true?
I'm halfway through "The Hiram Key" and I'm sure it says that.
Oh. I'm sorry. I thought you were referring to legitimate Masonic literature rather than fiction. Mea Culpa!
The Hiram Key is wonderfully entertaining but as far as authenticity....Necros' favorite site: freemasonrywatch is as reliable as that silly book.
By the way in case you happen to be interested "isent" is actually spelled "isn't" being a contraction of "Is" and "Not" (no "e" in either word, see?)
Same sort of rule for "Couldn't" "Shouldn't" "Wouldn't" etc.
Just in case you wanted to know. You know?
[edit on 1-5-2005 by senrak]