Nato members may send troops to Ukraine, warns former alliance chief

originally posted by: vNex92
The only reason there are now talks and debates of sending NATO troops in Ukraine.
Simply is because US/NATO is losing in Ukraine.

Yes, with every escalation and ramp up of equipment sent to the Ukraine it becomes more obvious. Nato aren't doing this because the Ukraine is winning, it wouldn't be necessary if they were.

Similarly, enlisting Nazi extremist groups to terrorise civilians over the border (after their failure in Bakhmut) doesn't sound like the actions of a group that is winning on the battlefields either.

a reply to: Quintilian

West/Western Countries unfortunately do not learn from history.

One simply does and can not defeat India, China, Russia the way they imagine.

Widely in the open they had discussed the decolonization of Russia, breaking up Russia into smaller provinces like the Balkans.


While a news Media outlet claimed that China would have an interest in Siberia?

Why would China take an interest in Siberia when that is a province of Russia? that seems as if they are celebrating the defeat of Russia to early.

Having Nato troops formally involved in the Ukraine is a dangerous escalation

Not just sending NATO troops or Polish troops boots on the grounds but trying to open a NATO office in Asia in Japan/Korea.

While trying to maintain that NATO is only a defensive alliance organization while they are opening a seconder front in Asia?

a reply to: vNex92

So Anders Rasmussen an official advisor to Zelenskky states basically what Zelenskky has been saying Ukraine wanted this whole time, doesn't mean he is any closer to getting those guarantees or NATO troops from any country.

a reply to: vNex92

Why not, it’s not like Americans need that money. (That’s sarcasm btw)

a reply to: vNex92
I'm sorry but it kind of sounds like NATO should be in Ukraine since Russia invaded them for making their own decisions. Decisions Russia has absolutely no say in because Ukraine is not Russia. They are a sovereign country.

Whenever they are contemplating upping the stakes they cart out a former head of this, that or the other to propaganise & push the narrative, probably so they can gauge public opinion based upon the response to the sabre rattling. Time will tell, but it sounds like the Poles & the Baltic states may be contemplating sending in the troops, even if they can't get full NATO guarantees of support & protection in terms of boots on the ground, which is clearly what Ukraine is angling for.