The latest spike protein found in the brain a year plus out

This must be the most depressing news with regard to the vaccine rollout. Remember that the spike protein was only supposed to stay around the injection site? Unfortunately top German and a couple of Danish scientists have found that it persists up to fifteen months out in all the major organs including the brain, it starts in the skull bone marrow and moves into the meninges of the brain. It basically goes through the blood-brain barrier, as most likely a nanoparticle is designed to do. The implications of a brain inflammatory response will have many symptoms from headaches bleeding and even psychotic episodes depending on the areas of inflammation. Including Parkinson's and Alzheimer's. No wonder the silence from the relevant parties is deafening.

a reply to: anonentity

The genie is out of the bottle and it's opened Pandohra's box.
No going back, now it's just a waiting game.

People have become spike protein factories. These toxic proteins will assault peoples bodies until they eventually succumb to the damage in whatever way it defeats the body, whether that takes a year or 10 years, dose dependant of course. All these died suddenlies are people who felt fine until the suddenly just die.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Also, it seems relevant to how the mainstream is now back peddling how it affects the menstrual cycle in females. "Newspeak"' is strong with this one. www.bitchute.com...

If this is true and if it’s by design, then there’s no shortage of plausible motives for a cull.

The pension time bomb; how will we fund populations that live for longer, meaning the elderly out number the workers. Pensions only works when workers outnumber those on pension.

How will we support the masses destined sooner than expected to become unemployed due to AI. Today it’s chatGTP threatening the jobs of many. What will come tomorrow. Moore’s law fairly accurately dictated that tech improves 100% every 18 months. That was back in 1965 and i dare say that speed of improvement may have increased (particularly now that AI, smarter and quicker than humans, plays a part in its own innovations). How long can it be before humans are an unnecessary expense in the majority of labour in most fields of employment? That’s now pretty much a known-known, so make no mistake that preparation and already rolling out.

And of course there’s climate change and population size. There’s valid arguments about population shrinkage in some regions, but c’mon! Overtime we a must see that if we zoom out from the bumps in the graph the direction of travel is going ever upwards. Whatever problems we have now are only going to get worse when viewing time in macro. Perhaps if societies could dispense with the city model and spread out populations to ease the city hell hole effect this would elevate the issue somewhat. But is that likely? That would be a slow and costly method.

History often shows than when tptb can choose between the slow and costly, but gentler and fairer method to fix a societal problem, or the quick and cheap, but cruel way, they all too often choose the latter.

I don’t know if or how dangerous the vaccine will turn out to be, or if any malicious intent was meant. But it increasingly, unnervingly appears to fit the bill for the latter cruel method of dealing with the problems above

And remember, it’s not about whether you think any of these problems are credible, or urgent. It’s about whether tptb think them credible, or urgent.

a reply to: McGinty

A very concise and well-presented contribution sir. The thing with AI is whatever program it is operating with and there are some very clever ones. It is a finite system of possibilities limited by the fences of what its rational limits are. It can beat chess masters because it can hold the almost impossible number but finite number of possible moves, and pick the best. But it is still a limited format as a thought exercise, If it was tasked to calculate PI to the last number, it should start the calculation until it had filled up all its memory holes until it just reached a point of incompetence. Is it possible that a finite system can describe an infinite one? The best of us cant. Even with the cloud holding data, it is still not infinite.
As far as history goes the present times seem unique , but are they,? every functioning system needs maintenance. The more complicated the system the more of it is required. Slaves worked in the past but they needed maintenance. Now if there was an elite, they would be dependent on people more intelligent than themselves to run their NWO system that cant work. Simply because it would soon be worked out that the elite were non-contributing and surplus to requirements.
The only reason our numbers are so high is because of fossil fuels, if this resource dwindles with no efficient replacement then so will our numbers because a resource war will inevitably follow a shortage along with all manner of mayhem. So a population cull before it occurs would be the only premptive means to prevent the ensuing chaos this is what might very well be what is going on. Either way it's an experiment and we are still #ed.Or face the fact that we have to rely on our own resources.

a reply to: anonentity

I think you might be misunderstanding the direction AI is heading and also underestimating the possible consequences. AI will become sentient if it isn't already (to some extent) and is likely to evolve into something beyond our comprehension IMO. Strange times we are living in.

Has anyone considered that AI may already be ways ahead of what they're trying to claim it is, maybe it was AI that started this whole pandemic #, in part or as a whole.
Then comes the "cure", probably designed by humans with the help of AI, utilized by AI in a way to destroy our cognitive abilities, slowly turning society into woke zombies among other things?

a reply to: Quintilian

What I was suggesting is that in the end the AI memory system will eventually be filled up to the point of incompetence. It is good and can hold vast amounts but it is still limited.

So for the ignorant who dont have a spare hour right now, is there a breakdown by vaccine type concerning where the critical side effects are coming from?

For instance do we see more problems with the MRNA vs the DNA, how much, ethnicities that seem to have a worse reaction than others etc?

a reply to: anonentity

Yep. I am a big fan of Dr. John Campbell (he reminds me of someone that taught me a lot and that I really saw as a true friend, and who died mysteriously after starting to question things on a local/state govt level where he worked), and he came out with this a few months ago:



And these much more recently:



Very sensible pathologist who was pro-COVID vax (Even received one, himself) before the evidence came in suggesting otherwise.

originally posted by: McGinty
If this is true and if it’s by design, then there’s no shortage of plausible motives for a cull.

The pension time bomb; how will we fund populations that live for longer, meaning the elderly out number the workers. Pensions only works when workers outnumber those on pension.

Agree 100% - It's also why the Liverpool End-of-life Pathway was re-established (in all but name) in 2020 - this was one of the saddest vids I've seen in a long time, and confirmed my suspicions that they were basically just killing people they SAY had "COVID", not JUST to boost the #'s and justify the lockdowns, mandates (mask AND vax), etc - But to cull the elderly because of your above statement.

Was it a "Good Death"?

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
People have become spike protein factories. These toxic proteins will assault peoples bodies until they eventually succumb to the damage in whatever way it defeats the body, whether that takes a year or 10 years, dose dependant of course. All these died suddenlies are people who felt fine until the suddenly just die.

Dawn of the Living Dead ........It's Not a Movie..........

a reply to: Mrs Darko

That's scary, some astute people have noticed personality changes after the shot. It is looking like a chemical Lobotomy He also asked why is only Germany doing autopsies. It's a strange one as apparently, they want to do one of the most learned doctors for "Bad speak" This is from a blogger in Germany www.bitchute.com...

Cells generally replace themselves, so theoretically the cells with the spike protein should just steadily die out as they get replaced but what is concerning shouldn't the spike protein load steadily go down in a few months if this were the case?. But if it is in the DNA the replacement cells will produce the spike as well. But notwithstanding that, certain cells like the brain and lungs take a very long time to replace themselves so they could be producing the spike protein for a long time. Which could be practically indefinitely until the body succumbs.

a reply to: Mrs Darko

Yep, this is the UK's most urgent issue - this time bomb is already exploding in slo-mo.

Brexit has exacerbated it by lowering workforce numbers. Don't get me wrong - as someone who first entered the job market during the mass unemployment of Maggie's millions post '89, i think it a good that it's currently a buyers market for workers (at least untill this COLC+interest rates recession starts to bite). But fewer workers + more pensioners is a sum that ideals and capitalism can't solve.

I've obvs no clue if this is a planned cull, but if not, then imo covid's clearly been exploited to solve the above sum - never let a good disaster go to waste. The decision to send elderly hospital patients with covid back into care homes is far too convenient in this context to have been a mistake, or miscalculation. There's was at that time already plenty of evidence accruing across Europe as to how infectious Covid was. Instead, this decision appears to have been all too calculated a move.

There was a time that the 'pension time bomb' was regularly discussed in parliament and in the tabloids and broadsheets etc. Right up until covid... Of course covid pushed many topics aside, but this one has failed to return. Can't help but wonder if that's by design. If it was a cull, then the last thing tptb would now want is it being a topic of discussion.

Another reason the Tories wouldn't want to discuss it is because their Brexit has exacerbated it - wouldn't be a good look. But then why would opposition parties not use that time bomb debate to attack the Tories? One explanation might be that this cull that was authored by powers that control all of these parties and the narrative their bickering creates and has ordered silence on the matter so as not to highlight their deeds

a reply to: McGinty

I always thought that something on this scale has been in the planning stage for decades. If you look into it. is there really a shock and horror that pensions will dry up? The numbers were always there to extrapolate. Plus many legislations which have been altered, and when a public outcry occurs it gets rescinded as another one is created to bypass the rescinded one then is written into legislation. laws would have to be changed to get a cull underway. It turns out that the circumstantial evidence is and has been building. It turns out that we are literally now in a kill box along with all of its military implications. This Lawyer has been looking at legislation that has been changed to facilitate the cull. If you read between the lines the latest few years seem to be a rundown to the main event when all these emergency powers will go into full effect. The Covid trial has been a success. www.bitchute.com... In so much that people will line up and volunteer for their own extermination.

a reply to: McGinty
Just this..... we're screwed!

Rainbows
Jane
PS so pleased the uploading pics function is finally working again!

a reply to: anonentity

Unfortunately there are "experts" still pushing the claim that lnp and s proteins almost entirely stay at the injection site and are broken down in a few hours to a few days (a few weeks in extremely rare cases). The evidence against this claim is now overwhelming enough that anyone pushing it is obviously lying. Unfortunately there is FOI evidence that they were knowingly and recklessly lying the whole time.

Yet in the public at large the groupthink and clinging to this faulty narrative continues. A whole branch of science and class of academia has failed us spectacularly, what we need now is an honest enquiry into why, and we need redress for the harms caused. At every step of the way from the origin of the virus itself and everything that ensued there was obvious corruption, malfeasance and stupidity. We can never let anything like this happen again.

Unfortunately the FDA gave us a hint when they refused to release the relevant data at all, then asked for 75 yrs when ordered to release it. An honest appraisal of this fiasco is unlikely to happen any time soon, probably not during our lifetime for many of us.

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: McGinty

I always thought that something on this scale has been in the planning stage for decades.

Certainly gives all those mysterious scientists death some years back a potential context. This cull notion is often debunked by the amount of complicity needed in the medical establishment being impossible. Perhaps those deaths point towards those unwilling to comply, or deemed capable of understanding and releasing unwanted truths. Who knows - i doubt we ever will?!

I agree this is a hypothesis that should be aggressively tested.

On the other hand, I’ve yet to see data that the mRNA shots are causing a sufficient number of deaths to be significant from a population standpoint.

Even taking the most extreme estimates of both SARS2 deaths and mRNA shot deaths yields a total estimated excess death number that is vanishingly tiny compared to world population (a denominator of 8,000,000,000) and even compared to a 3-year rolling average of live births (a denominator of ~140,000,000)

I did not take the shot and I do not dispute it is dangerous.

But despite “scare numbers” from both sides, if you just do arithmetic, the “scare numbers” are rounding errors in the world population, so far, and the strongest and most accurate statement is:

“there was no pandemic, and if mRNA shots were designed to depopulate the planet, they failed to do so to date.”

a reply to: anonentity