Ex CIA chief 50 spies saying Hunter Biden laptop scandal Russian disinfo to HELP Joe win 2020

Would anyone holding a copy of the Hunter Biden laptop hard drive, please upload it to tbe dark web?

That way, several millions of amateur sleuths could assist the FBI in ferreting out any wrongdoing.

Allways willing to assist law enforcement.

Brown shirts if you go back in normal history

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: network dude

I didn't say that. I'm saying all the other hands and intentional interference muddy it up tremendously. And the fact that the committee member itself is not saying they found laws broken, it's not looking too good. If there are laws broken, I have no issue with any charges.

No one is above the law. The aligations are to important to just ignore. The committee should keep investigating and keep investigating until they find something.

Maybe after this we can get to the bottom of that 2 billion for Jared. I mean a guy who had to redo his security clearance paperwork multiple times due to "errors" and placed into a top government position even though he was denied by absolutely everyone who knows what to look for, but overridden by his father in law is worth a look.

Why do people always resort to whataboutism when their chosen political leaders are alleged to be criminals?

a reply to: dandandat2

Not at all. Pointing out 2 billion was given to a man from the Saudi Wealth Fund and originally did not disclose who it was from on his SEC filing. The same man who could not get security clearance and yet was installed into a position into the WH.

I stated that they should also check into this. Also is not instead of. I mean weird if you're fine investigating a private citizen and worried about a few million, but billions given by SA to someone who was in one of the highest WH positions he shouldn't have even been in, is cool.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: dandandat2

Not at all. Pointing out 2 billion was given to a man from the Saudi Wealth Fund and originally did not disclose who it was from on his SEC filing. The same man who could not get security clearance and yet was installed into a position into the WH.

I stated that they should also check into this. Also is not instead of. I mean weird if you're fine investigating a private citizen and worried about a few million, but billions given by SA to someone who was in one of the highest WH positions he shouldn't have even been in, is cool.

More Whataboutism?

The topic of the threads is "Ex CIA chief 50 spies saying Hunter Biden laptop scandal Russian disinfo to HELP Joe win 2020"

No one is above the law; that is true if Biden was bribed with $1 a or a few million.

a reply to: dandandat2

Hmm, you are going to be very busy today, from perusing a few threads just in most recent, there are a lot of posts bringing up Biden in a thread about Trump. You might want to get to policing and posting this same thing on them. I'm sure you will, right?

a reply to: putnam6

Mike Morell told the House Judiciary Committee that he was asked by Antony Blinken, the Secretary of State - who at the time was a senior member of the Biden campaign - to help discredit the laptop reporting.

So uh….
This is absolutely awful
They wonder why no one trusts them

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: dandandat2

Hmm, you are going to be very busy today, from perusing a few threads just in most recent, there are a lot of posts bringing up Biden in a thread about Trump. You might want to get to policing and posting this same thing on them. I'm sure you will, right?

So Joe Biden and his family should be above the law because Whataboutism exists in other ATS threads? That doesn't sound like a convincing argument.

a reply to: dandandat2

Not sure why you keep trying to spin this. I have no problem with the investigation. I have an issue with claiming there's no issue with provenance of the hard drive since we have people like Bannon admitting his team uploaded things to it.

I stated after this investigation hopefully we get one into those billions gained by a person in a high level WH position who couldn't even get security clearance.

I also asked since you have appointed yourself policing threads if you will do the same for the other threads. Of course you will not. That's expected.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: putnam6

Mike Morell told the House Judiciary Committee that he was asked by Antony Blinken, the Secretary of State - who at the time was a senior member of the Biden campaign - to help discredit the laptop reporting.

So uh….
This is absolutely awful
They wonder why no one trusts them

When Hunter Biden meets with d o j prosecutors tomorrow, we will learn that he was not prosecuted before now for tax violations, because several family members have committed the same crime.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: dandandat2

Not sure why you keep trying to spin this. I have no problem with the investigation. I have an issue with claiming there's no issue with provenance of the hard drive since we have people like Bannon admitting his team uploaded things to it.

Oh, my mistake. So we agree, Joe Biden and his family should be investigated to the fullest extent of the law and congressional processes because the aligations of corruption brought about by information found on Hunter Biden's laptop is too important to ignore.

The provenance of the laptop is almost irrelevant at this point in the process. Any evidence used against Joe Biden and his family in a court of law should most definitely be authenticated. But for now, durung the investigation and congressional hearings (ie before the court cases begin) the investigators should assume the information is accurate and let it lead them; leaving no stone unturned as they investigate Joe's and Hunter's business deals.

I stated after this investigation hopefully we get one into those billions gained by a person in a high level WH position who couldn't even get security clearance.

I also asked since you have appointed yourself policing threads if you will do the same for the other threads. Of course you will not. That's expected.

These aligations are irrelevant to the issue of investigating Joe and Hunter Biden's alleged corruption as demonstrated by the information found on Hunter Biden's lap top ... for which 50 intel officials tried to cover up in order to influence an election.

So I am not sure why you keep bringing them up; except to add whataboutism to the discussion as a means to deflect from the topic of investigations into Biden corruption and official coverups.

Since you agree that Joe Biden, his son, and the 50 intel officials should be investigated for their alleged corruption why the need for the whataboutism? The investigation will prove their innocence... assuming they are innocent; whataboutism not required.

a reply to: carewemust
Documented tax violations?
That is interesting
Not as interesting as where the money came from causing the violations tho.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: dandandat2

Not sure why you keep trying to spin this. I have no problem with the investigation. I have an issue with claiming there's no issue with provenance of the hard drive since we have people like Bannon admitting his team uploaded things to it.

Easy to (dis)prove, seeing as the FBI has had the actual laptop from almost the very beginning.

And you know we can trust the FBI... am-i-rite?

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: dandandat2

Not sure why you keep trying to spin this. I have no problem with the investigation. I have an issue with claiming there's no issue with provenance of the hard drive since we have people like Bannon admitting his team uploaded things to it.

Easy to (dis)prove, seeing as the FBI has had the actual laptop from almost the very beginning.

And you know we can trust the FBI... am-i-rite?

True, and Trump's DOJ and IRS never brought charges. And since the chatter is that the shop owner had been contacting Rudy well before the sudden appearance of the drive, it still may be a sketchy situation. Either way, eventually charges may come to light or further info about the hard drive will come about. No telling.

a reply to: frogs453
Yeah you are right
It’s “sketchy “ so it should just be dropped



Lol

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: dandandat2

Not sure why you keep trying to spin this. I have no problem with the investigation. I have an issue with claiming there's no issue with provenance of the hard drive since we have people like Bannon admitting his team uploaded things to it.

I stated after this investigation hopefully we get one into those billions gained by a person in a high level WH position who couldn't even get security clearance.

I also asked since you have appointed yourself policing threads if you will do the same for the other threads. Of course you will not. That's expected.

"people like Bannon admitting his team uploaded things to it"

Was anything ever proven about that? or was it all just talk 😁

originally posted by: frogs453

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: dandandat2

Not sure why you keep trying to spin this. I have no problem with the investigation. I have an issue with claiming there's no issue with provenance of the hard drive since we have people like Bannon admitting his team uploaded things to it.

Easy to (dis)prove, seeing as the FBI has had the actual laptop from almost the very beginning.

And you know we can trust the FBI... am-i-rite?

True, and Trump's DOJ and IRS never brought charges. And since the chatter is that the shop owner had been contacting Rudy well before the sudden appearance of the drive, it still may be a sketchy situation. Either way, eventually charges may come to light or further info about the hard drive will come about. No telling.

How could Trump's DOJ and IRS have brought charges when the internal corruption was lingering there for decades? 😁

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: frogs453
Yeah you are right
It’s “sketchy “ so it should just be dropped



Lol

Did I say that? No. I said:

eventually charges may come to light or further info about the hard drive will come about. No telling.

For about the 30th time, if the relevant area of the government finds charges are necessary I have no problem with that. Again I don't have fealty to any politician.

a reply to: frogs453
Only took 5 years
But he is a Biden

Sonofabitch, that prosecutor was gone….

originally posted by: frogs453

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: frogs453
Yeah you are right
It’s “sketchy “ so it should just be dropped



Lol

Did I say that? No. I said:

eventually charges may come to light or further info about the hard drive will come about. No telling.

For about the 30th time, if the relevant area of the government finds charges are necessary I have no problem with that. Again I don't have fealty to any politician.

But what if a "relevant" area of the government is corrupt and dominated by inside political influences? And the only part of "government" that can actually make "charges" is The DOJ Prosecutors. What other "relevant" area can do that? 😁