Looks like Russia took out a NATO command centre

a reply to: Zaphod58

Not sure where the 300 BS comes from but the vtforeignpolicy.com site just says ' 2 Dozen US and British Officers Killed.' which is much more plausible . . .

a reply to: chris_stibrany

I don't think that the word "plausible" can conceivably be applied to anything in the OP.

a reply to: chris_stibrany

Which would still be at least twice that an almost identical number were killed, because last year 30 were killed in an air strike according to Russian sources. Or were captured and executed, according to other sources.

That appears to be related to Veterans Today, which is known for posting lots of BS and claiming he had to so he wouldn’t be killed or some crap. And if you read the article there’s a lot of “believes” and “assumes” thrown in there. But hitting a bunker that deep, and doing that much damage would leave an obvious impact area. Has anyone found one? I haven’t been following this closely, but haven’t seen anything about an impact that could have blown up a bunker over 200 feet down.

originally posted by: caterpillage
This breaking story is in fact totally true.
..... the odds of success were astronomically against them as the target was only a couple meters wide and had to be hit with great precision. A direct hit, if successful, would result in a chain reaction causing the power plant of the facility to explode with enough force to completely destroy the entire structure.

Are you describing Luke taking out the deathstar?

a reply to: glen200376

Your question should be ,"Why the hell does NATO have command centres in Ukraine?".

To which the answer would be "because Russian Milbloggers say so" and people like the OP are like farmers manuring a field with disinformation for Russia.

NATO doesn't have command centres in Ukraine because Ukraine isn't a NATO member.

a reply to: Zaphod58

For sure , doesn't pass the smell test .

When and at what time was this supposed bunker-busting missile dropped?

Does anyone know how to read seismographs?

a reply to: anonentity

"I think it is entirely plausible that they would take out a NATO command center as that is the brains of Ukraine. It does not matter how deep down the center is, if you keep hammering the place You end up with a crater at the relevant depth. Let's face it it was a gift as NATO officers were not supposed to be there so they can't be killed right? no diplomatic worries."

Are you still flogging your long dead horse?

Give it up, man.

You guys made my day today. Reading this thread and seeing how many fellow Americans, even some conservatives that used to support some Russian agendas, are standing up to clearly Russian propaganda. The OP even gives himself away by continuing to call Kyiv Kiev. A clear giveaway of an Eastern European propagandist.

Thanks ATS.

a reply to: Cutepants
Yeah but we do not have concrete donkeys and mole squadrons in reality.

I heard about magic bullets though.

a reply to: caterpillage

Die, rebel scum!

a reply to: chris_stibrany

It's a trap!!!!!!

a reply to: Mahogany

Without factual reporting, the whole swathe of the population, won't have a solid grasp on the reality of any situation, let alone one that could cause a global catastrophe. But I guess suckers will never get an even break. They never have and apparently never will. To assume that the Western influence in Ukraine hasn't been targeted is delusional.

a reply to: anonentity

The reality of the situation is that there are no non-nuclear bunker-buster missiles or bombs that can breach 400ft of earth and reinforced concrete so, there is that.

originally posted by: interupt42

originally posted by: Zaphod58
This is at least the second time since the war started “300 high ranking NATO officers” have been killed in an underground bunker.

so what you are saying is that 600 high ranking nato officers have been killed in an underground bunker.

Got it.

If we follow the logical progression, by the weekend up to 2400 and maybe even 4800 high ranking NATO officers will have lost their lives in bunkers.

NATO insurance must be through the roof right now.

Dbl pst

originally posted by: anonentity
According to Redacted...

And thats where I stopped reading.

**Decides to peruse the Redacted YT channel for #s and giggles and morbid curiosity... notices a video titled 'He's EXPOSING the most suppressed UFO and Alien evidence of all time'... that is talking about Billie Meier... lol.** #s and Giggles achieved!

a reply to: anonentity

As opposed to believing everything posted on Bitchute, regardless of what it says?

originally posted by: anonentity
According to Redacted a big media coverup has been underway, To keep silent about a NATO command center that was taken out in Kiev. It is stated that three hundred high command officials have been killed, the missile took out a bunker that was four hundred feet underground. They can't respond because they would have to admit they were there pulling the strings.It was in retaliation for an attack in Russia on civillian targets. According to Clayton, NATO has had its head chopped off, hence the diplomatic efforts by Macron to try and get China to broker a peace deal. www.bitchute.com... Veterans today mentions it as well ... www.vtforeignpolicy.com...

300 in one bunker? Four hundred feet down. Took out like 9 platoons in one bunker. 400 feet down. K

a reply to: andy06shake

During the Iraq war, they showed a guided bomb doing it, one ventilation shaft and it is all over.