It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You made the claim the story is not genuine and the burden of proof is ok you and not on me.
originally posted by: TDDAgain
a reply to: Allaroundyou
As if you would verify every article or website you post personally. You're being ridiculous. If you claim the article is untrue, then support your claim. If you can't do that, let the readers decide for themselves.
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Asmodeus3
Do you have something there to claim the story is not genuine?
Yeah , it's in the Daily Mail.
Now do you have anything to show the story is genuine ?
I am not the one who brought it up by the way. You made the claim the story is not genuine and the burden of proof is on you and not on me.
The burden of proof falls on the OP.
It's called due diligence.
Nice try though.
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Asmodeus3
Do you have something there to claim the story is not genuine?
Yeah , it's in the Daily Mail.
Now do you have anything to show the story is genuine ?
I am not the one who brought it up by the way. You made the claim the story is not genuine and the burden of proof is on you and not on me.
The burden of proof falls on the OP.
It's called due diligence.
Nice try though.
prove you aren't a bot.
link to the google search on this story. And many returns.
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Asmodeus3
You made the claim the story is not genuine and the burden of proof is ok you and not on me.
I don't think it's much of a burden if your source is the Daily Mail.
I guess you're not British , otherwise you would know.
www.theguardian.com...
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
originally posted by: TDDAgain
a reply to: Allaroundyou
As if you would verify every article or website you post personally. You're being ridiculous. If you claim the article is untrue, then support your claim. If you can't do that, let the readers decide for themselves.
I actually do verify any link I post or read.
It's not that hard to do and is something everyone should be doing anyways.
Another amazing story from woke England.....
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Asmodeus3
Do you have something there to claim the story is not genuine?
Yeah , it's in the Daily Mail.
Now do you have anything to show the story is genuine ?
I am not the one who brought it up by the way. You made the claim the story is not genuine and the burden of proof is on you and not on me.
The burden of proof falls on the OP.
It's called due diligence.
Nice try though.
False or true, the fact that it doesn't shock those of us who are aware of these things/issues happening daily should tell anyone with an IQ above room temp that we're heading towards a dangerous and fascist end if we idly stand by and watch it happen without speaking up against it.
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: Asmodeus3
Another amazing story from woke England.....
As opposed to the incredibly unwoke USA, Canada, Australia et al?
I certainly wouldn't discount the possibility that this happened - there's enough examples of this insanity from numerous countries - but to be fair, an anonymous teacher from an unnamed school?
Must do better.
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: DBCowboy
False or true, the fact that it doesn't shock those of us who are aware of these things/issues happening daily should tell anyone with an IQ above room temp that we're heading towards a dangerous and fascist end if we idly stand by and watch it happen without speaking up against it.
Nothing more fascist than singling out a minority , seems we're already there don't it.
originally posted by: UpThenDown
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: GoShredAK
I really hope this is fake news but it probably did happen which is so stupid.
Daily Mail , unnamed teacher , unnamed school.
Why wouldn't it be fake news.
In comparison to what? The BBC? that has the lower standards and got humiliated a few days ago when the woke activist and reporter James Clayton tried to play it 'smart' with Elon Musk...
wow this is like the 4th thread where you bring that into the conversation.
is this thread about this unmamed school/unamed teacher/no date of when it happened story (lets not mention the stock photo they used of a school with both boys and girls in it despite the story being about an all girls school) or the woke BBC journalist and James Clayton?
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
originally posted by: TDDAgain
a reply to: Allaroundyou
As if you would verify every article or website you post personally. You're being ridiculous. If you claim the article is untrue, then support your claim. If you can't do that, let the readers decide for themselves.
I actually do verify any link I post or read.
It's not that hard to do and is something everyone should be doing anyways.