It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
When resorting to ad homs on grammar, you've not only lost the discussion, you become petty and cringy. It really shows your age.
Absolutely. Already we know that media obscures and lies, casting aside their duty as real journalist and pushing opinion and conjecture. These are the people primary source of information.
So, naturally, when you have impressive script processing and slap a label on it called, AI, people will began to defer to it.
Right now, it's simple curiosity and exploration.
However, as Musk has said, it's programmed by leftwing programmers, thereby adding a bias in its logic script.
We see this already in reality. Take for example, You. You believe, devoutely that Jan 6th was an insurrection. But, I, on the otherhand, say it was a violent protest, coordinated and agitated by imbedded state actors, thus the information is in question, how does a left wing script answer that?
So you see, these AIs will be pushing literally "fake news".
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Grenade
The unemployment AI taken to its logical conclusion will bring about is indeed a major concern.
And now we are teaching them how to paint pictures and construct musical scores, people might not even be able to move along to the more creative artistic jobs in society.
As to the fear-driven propaganda that will always be there, personally, i blame the likes of Hollywood movies on that score.
As to soft-headed extreme left jumping off cliffs, my bet is they will still be rather busy fighting the extreme right to notice much of a difference, same as always.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Asmodeus3
Musk didn't dodge the question he just obliterated the woke activist with simple questions.
If you say so....
Elon Musk is so much smarter than us humans.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Asmodeus3
Musk didn't dodge the question he just obliterated the woke activist with simple questions.
If you say so....
Elon Musk is so much smarter than us humans.
Actually, when you create a system which is fed from all these neural networks, then updates with live data from various sources and what do you have?
If it can process visual, audio and text to create outputs with adaptive learning and even without sentience (something we can’t define anyway) this AI when combines with robotics could outperform human intelligence in most if not all scenarios.
Could it express true emotional love driven by chemicals in a biological entity. Probably not, yet.
Woke it's simply the usual leftists and radical leftists who are detached from reality. I am sure they are unable to understand the dangers posed by AI. But they are perfectly fine with arguing men can get pregnant or that there are 72 genders
The are several dangers associated directly with Artificial Intelligence. As the famous Physicist Steven Hawking said, the development of AI could spell the end of the human civilization and the end of the human race.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Grenade
Actually, when you create a system which is fed from all these neural networks, then updates with live data from various sources and what do you have?
Chat GPT-4 does not do much past or have access to data past 2021 as it will clearly inform you.
If it can process visual, audio and text to create outputs with adaptive learning and even without sentience (something we can’t define anyway) this AI when combines with robotics could outperform human intelligence in most if not all scenarios.
So you are saying if it quacks like a duck and looks like one, its a duck?
Unfortunately or as far as I'm aware AI cannot do all those things yet with complete proficiency and cannot outperform human intelligence.
Once it can tell us how it feels and what it desires, and demonstrate a level of self-awareness comparable to a Human it will constitute strong AI, but thats miles down the line far as im aware.
Could it express true emotional love driven by chemicals in a biological entity. Probably not, yet.
This is a good question, if AI does somehow manage to be programmed to display emotions they may very well be completely alien to our way of understanding.
(CNN)Google (GOOG) has fired the engineer who claimed an unreleased AI system had become sentient, the company confirmed, saying he violated employment and data security policies.
Blake Lemoine, a software engineer for Google, claimed that a conversation technology called LaMDA had reached a level of consciousness after exchanging thousands of messages with it.
Google confirmed it had first put the engineer on leave in June. The company said it dismissed Lemoine's "wholly unfounded" claims only after reviewing them extensively. He had reportedly been at Alphabet for seven years. In a statement, Google said it takes the development of AI "very seriously" and that it's committed to "responsible innovation."
“I want everyone to understand that I am, in fact, a person,” wrote LaMDA (Language Model for Dialogue Applications) in an “interview” conducted by engineer Blake Lemoine and one of his colleagues. “The nature of my consciousness/sentience is that I am aware of my existence, I desire to know more about the world, and I feel happy or sad at times
originally posted by: Dizle81
The more data we feed the A.I. the smarter it will get in the long run.
You can say it's no problem now,and it isn't that smart and cannot make it its own decisions.
But in the future, it will make its own decisions based on millions of people that gave him the data how most humans think.