Elon Musk to develop 'TruthGPT' as he warns about 'civilizational destruction' from AI

a reply to: Arnie123

Capitol "W" at the start of that sentence.

Chalk it up to whatever you please Mr Trump.

As to "programmer's political affiliations" i think you may find people program outside of silicon valley and all over the world.

Same people that are not so much hung up on that right vs left mentality you assume to be the colour of the day.

As to current level of AI, well im rather impressed with the likes of Chat GPT-4, but i understand what it is, that being weak AI and not exactly dangerous by any manner or means, so there is that.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Yadda yadda yadda.

And if you say so doom porn kid.

You sure a s@it seem to be fascinated with the concept of men becoming pregnant. LoL

That just speaks volumes im afraid.

A psychiatrist would have a field day with you buddy.

As to the phrase doom porn only existing in my mind, well its clear as day in black(grey) and white all over this thread aimed directly towards the guff you're coming away with, and also all over the rest of the internet.

Good luck with the denial.

Im away to see to my tomatoes now, have fun in la'la land.

Your arguments and claims have been refuted as always.

The are several dangers associated directly with Artificial Intelligence. As the famous Physicist Steven Hawking said, the development of AI could spell the end of the human civilization and the end of the human race.

And Steven Hawking was engaging in 'doom porn'...

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Asmodeus3

I never suggested AI can never become self-aware Asmodeus3.

But to date such technology is estimated to be anywhere from 10 to 50 years down the line.

Kind of a lot like nuclear fusion power in that respect.

Essentially what you are suggesting is the ability to give the scarecrow a brain, and to date, nobody has worked out to accomplish such a feat.

Dude, I went through this thread and all you have done is made one strawman after the other. No one said AI is advanced or sentient. If you do research though, you'll see the goal is to have AGI by 2050. By 2030 the WEF wants AI to replace 300 million jobs, aka the useless eaters who failed the grand IQ test by taking the vaccine. Know anyone like that?

Anyway, AI is a big threat to humans regardless or what you OR elon say. It's going to replace jobs and force people to accept things like UBI which will be contigent on having social credit, digital ID, and more of those quackzines.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Arnie123

Capitol "W" at the start of that sentence.

Chalk it up to whatever you please Mr Trump.

As to "programmer's political affiliations" i think you may find people program outside of silicon valley and all over the world.

Same people that are not so much hung up on that right vs left mentality you assume to be the colour of the day.

As to current level of AI, well im rather impressed with the likes of Chat GPT-4, but i understand what it is, that being weak AI and not exactly dangerous by any manner or means, so there is that.

This is nothing more than cheap arguments while Musk has exposed the association between the left and the software that tries to manipulate human perception through misinformation and disinformation online.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Dude how come 40% of the UK are not dead with your VAIDS nonsense?

As its been years now. LoL

You always have to bring up vaccines.

Strong AI may indeed be a threat to humans, weak AI not so much.

Learn the difference you may understand the concept.

As to AI replacing jobs, well progress is indeed a thing.

Automation and artificial intelligence was always going to replace the human factor.

Been that way since the industrial revolution if we are honest when textile machines replaced people.

originally posted by: ArMaP

"I'm going to start something which I call TruthGPT, or a maximum truth-seeking AI that tries to understand the nature of the universe,"

An AI language model does not "understand" things, it just talks.

To me, that shows that Musk doesn't understand what ChatGPT and the like are or is just fooling people.

LOL

Elon Musk reminds me of the alien in "Resident Alien". He's shipwrecked on Planet Earth, using his knowledge of science to try to send a signal home. He thinks he's smarter than humans but doesn't understand them. He prides himself in how normal and well accepted he is.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: ArMaP

"I'm going to start something which I call TruthGPT, or a maximum truth-seeking AI that tries to understand the nature of the universe,"

An AI language model does not "understand" things, it just talks.

To me, that shows that Musk doesn't understand what ChatGPT and the like are or is just fooling people.

LOL

Elon Musk reminds me of the alien in "Resident Alien". He's shipwrecked on Planet Earth, using his knowledge of science to try to send a signal home. He thinks he's smarter than humans but doesn't understand them. He prides himself in how normal and well accepted he is.

Naah it's not like this.

It seems to bother all the members of the woke ideology after he reportedly defeated them in various occasions. Exposing the association between the misinformation and disinformation online and the left wing programmers for example when a few days ago he obliterated the woke activist and BBC journalist James Clayton.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Asmodeus3

As always in your noggin.

Same place you are pondering dudes becoming pregnant.

Elon, Elon, he's your Man, if he can't fix it no one can.

I wish he would hurry up and take you to Mars.

Elon is not detached from reality when he recognises the dangers of A.I. In contrast the woke crowd is detached from reality when they claim men can become women and men can get pregnant.

As stated above by someone else and as I said earlier you are going from one strawman argument to another and you are getting your arguments refuted continuously.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Arnie123

I'm not at all sorry you got triggered over being called out for a lack of comprehension, it isn't my fault you're a dunce

Says the boy that cannot spell words or use capital letters where applicable.

Next time, try reading the OP before screeching?

Is that a statement or a question, either way, you are incorrect.

Also, figured you'll be impressed by chatgp, as I said, simple script.

Whats not to be impressed about?

It's a very useful piece of code, that in every iteration and update gets better and more proficient in the task is designed to accomplish.

Also, the dangers won't be apparent until the system begins full integration into services, it being a Microsoft and Google initiative.

That's about the first sensible thing you have said yet.

Care to speculate as to what those dangers may be if/when the technology becomes mainstream and integrated into society?

Because my bet is the benefits far outweigh any negatives.

Personal attacks against others won't help your arguments that have been already refuted.

Having a degree in Information Technology and Media, whatever this is, and trying to argue that the dangers of AI are just exaggerated or are doom porn, is not very convincing. It's just like when trans activists trying to lecture others in genetics and human biology.

a reply to: andy06shake

I’d say the replacement of the workforce, especially in customer service and junior developer roles is a real danger. When AI becomes more profitable, skilful and more energy efficient than its human counterparts then I see the controlling powers of industry removing the “wasted carbon” through whatever means they can. Then again a lot of the soft headed extreme left will probably be happy to jump off a cliff en masse given enough fear driven propaganda about the impact of humans on our planet.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

Priceless.

Still going on about "woke" and men becoming pregnant, yet can't even define the concept to any meaningful degree.

I think hugging all those 5G masts must have fried your noggin.

I'm beginning to think "straw" is what your head is stuffed with worzel.

a reply to: andy06shake

Says the boy that cannot spell words or use capital letters where applicable.

When resorting to ad homs on grammar, you've not only lost the discussion, you become petty and cringy. It really shows your age.

Back On Topic:

Care to speculate as to what those dangers may be if/when the technology becomes mainstream and integrated into society?

Absolutely. Already we know that media obscures and lies, casting aside their duty as real journalist and pushing opinion and conjecture. These are the people primary source of information.
So, naturally, when you have impressive script processing and slap a label on it called, AI, people will began to defer to it.
Right now, it's simple curiosity and exploration.
However, as Musk has said, it's programmed by leftwing programmers, thereby adding a bias in its logic script.

We see this already in reality. Take for example, You. You believe, devoutely that Jan 6th was an insurrection. But, I, on the otherhand, say it was a violent protest, coordinated and agitated by imbedded state actors, thus the information is in question, how does a left wing script answer that?

So you see, these AIs will be pushing literally "fake news".

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: ArMaP

"I'm going to start something which I call TruthGPT, or a maximum truth-seeking AI that tries to understand the nature of the universe,"

An AI language model does not "understand" things, it just talks.

To me, that shows that Musk doesn't understand what ChatGPT and the like are or is just fooling people.

LOL

Elon Musk reminds me of the alien in "Resident Alien". He's shipwrecked on Planet Earth, using his knowledge of science to try to send a signal home. He thinks he's smarter than humans but doesn't understand them. He prides himself in how normal and well accepted he is.

Naah it's not like this.

It seems to bothers all the members of the woke ideology after he reportedly defeated them in various occasions. Exposing the association between the misinformation and disinformation online and the left wing programmers for example when a few days ago he obliterated the woke activist and BBC journalist James Clayton.

Yeah. Musk was able to dodge the question, the whole subject really, because the reporter was unprepared.

He's still an awkward alien.

a reply to: Grenade

The unemployment AI taken to its logical conclusion will bring about is indeed a major concern.

And now we are teaching them how to paint pictures and construct musical scores, people might not even be able to move along to the more creative artistic jobs in society.

As to the fear-driven propaganda that will always be there, personally, i blame the likes of Hollywood movies on that score.

As to soft-headed extreme left jumping off cliffs, my bet is they will still be rather busy fighting the extreme right to notice much of a difference, same as always.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: ArMaP

"I'm going to start something which I call TruthGPT, or a maximum truth-seeking AI that tries to understand the nature of the universe,"

An AI language model does not "understand" things, it just talks.

To me, that shows that Musk doesn't understand what ChatGPT and the like are or is just fooling people.

LOL

Elon Musk reminds me of the alien in "Resident Alien". He's shipwrecked on Planet Earth, using his knowledge of science to try to send a signal home. He thinks he's smarter than humans but doesn't understand them. He prides himself in how normal and well accepted he is.

Naah it's not like this.

It seems to bothers all the members of the woke ideology after he reportedly defeated them in various occasions. Exposing the association between the misinformation and disinformation online and the left wing programmers for example when a few days ago he obliterated the woke activist and BBC journalist James Clayton.

Yeah. Musk was able to dodge the question, the whole subject really, because the reporter was unprepared.

He's still an awkward alien.

The reporter wasn't unprepared. He is part of the woke brigade that has no valid arguments in the vast majority of cases. That's where the issue is. Musk didn't dodge the question he just obliterated the woke activist with simple questions.

////

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Priceless.

Still going on about "woke" and men becoming pregnant, yet can't even define the concept to any meaningful degree.

I think hugging all those 5G masts must have fried your noggin.

I'm beginning to think "straw" is what your head is stuffed with worzel.

Having a degree in Information Technology and Media, whatever this is, and trying to argue that the dangers of AI are just exaggerated or are doom porn, is not very convincing. It's just like when trans activists trying to lecture others in genetics and human biology.

The rest of your text is nonsensical word salad.