Leaked Top Secret Documents Confirm Americans Fighting Russians Inside Ukraine.

Tuesday, April 11, 2023

Much Damage: REVEALING U.S. GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS LEAKED ONLINE.

The U.S. is not supposed to have troops physically inside the country of Ukraine during the country's war against Russia, but...

The U.S. Intelligence Leaks Confirm Active U.S. and U.K. Military are Conducting War Operations Inside Ukraine.

Yesterday White House Spokesman for Strategic Communications, John Kirby, asked media not to report on the leaked classified intelligence that has been showing up on various social media platforms.

The classified intel was designated NOFORN, meaning the containment silo forbids sharing with any non-U.S. citizen; ergo the leaks came from inside our own Intelligence Community silos.

Continued at: theconservativetreehouse.com... de-ukraine/

The Biden Administration is stunned to silence. The Pentagon was caught totally off guard. It was WEEKS before the Biden Administration realized these documents had been place on Social Media websites. Talk about "asleep at the wheel".

President Biden is on a pre-scheduled trip right now in IRELAND. He will be meeting with foreign leaders, and embarrassingly trying to explain things they were not supposed to know.

-CareWeMust

There’s no secret we’ve been feeding them intel and training.

The leaked intel suggests there’s a NATO presence of 100 spec ops. I didn’t see anything that shows they’re actively fighting Russians like the title suggests.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

Russia likely knew this from 2014. Another reason Russia isnt going to be withdrawing from Ukraine.
I do fear Ukraine becoming another Vietnam for US.

Well there is a Ukraine Foreign Legion for a reason. lol j/k

I can see advisors on the ground and even in combat, I have seen videos with perfectly spoken english voices giving orders to Ukraine soldiers out of view of the camera footage.
From my knowledge Ukraine usually puts foreign legion soldiers with others that speak their language.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
There’s no secret we’ve been feeding them intel and training.

The leaked intel suggests there’s a NATO presence of 100 spec ops. I didn’t see anything that shows they’re actively fighting Russians like the title suggests.

It's a fine distinction, it won't help the situation. Russia will milk it for all it's worth.

Not to mention what's happening in Tbilisi?

www.bbc.com...

The UK is among a number of countries with military special forces operating inside Ukraine, according to one of dozens of documents leaked online.

It confirms what has been the subject of quiet speculation for over a year.

The leaked files, some marked "top secret", paint a detailed picture of the war in Ukraine, including sensitive details of Ukraine's preparations for a spring counter-offensive.

The US government says it is investigating the source of the leak.

According to the document, dated 23 March, the UK has the largest contingent of special forces in Ukraine (50), followed by fellow Nato states Latvia (17), France (15), the US (14) and the Netherlands (1).

The document does not say where the forces are located or what they are doing.

The numbers of personnel may be small, and will doubtless fluctuate. But special forces are by their very nature highly effective. Their presence in Ukraine is likely to be seized upon by Moscow, which has in recent months argued that it is not just confronting Ukraine, but Nato as well.

originally posted by: EmeraldCoastFreedm
Well there is a Ukraine Foreign Legion for a reason. lol j/k

I can see advisors on the ground and even in combat, I have seen videos with perfectly spoken english voices giving orders to Ukraine soldiers out of view of the camera footage.
From my knowledge Ukraine usually puts foreign legion soldiers with others that speak their language.

Respectfully these are Special Forces, are you sure they are just advisors?


www.bbc.com...

According to the document, dated 23 March, the UK has the largest contingent of special forces in Ukraine (50), followed by fellow Nato states Latvia (17), France (15), the US (14) and the Netherlands (1).

The document does not say where the forces are located or what they are doing.

The numbers of personnel may be small, and will doubtless fluctuate. But special forces are by their very nature highly effective. Their presence in Ukraine is likely to be seized upon by Moscow, which has in recent months argued that it is not just confronting Ukraine, but Nato as well.

IF those documents were legitimate, and truly sensitive/damaging to US interests...


Would the government be playing up their potential impact all across the MSM?


If the docs were really dangerous "leaks", the intelligence community would be working hard to keep any mention of their contents out of the MSM.

"Out of (public) sight, out of (public) mind".

originally posted by: putnam6

originally posted by: EmeraldCoastFreedm
Well there is a Ukraine Foreign Legion for a reason. lol j/k

I can see advisors on the ground and even in combat, I have seen videos with perfectly spoken english voices giving orders to Ukraine soldiers out of view of the camera footage.
From my knowledge Ukraine usually puts foreign legion soldiers with others that speak their language.

Respectfully these are Special Forces, are you sure they are just advisors?


www.bbc.com...

According to the document, dated 23 March, the UK has the largest contingent of special forces in Ukraine (50), followed by fellow Nato states Latvia (17), France (15), the US (14) and the Netherlands (1).

The document does not say where the forces are located or what they are doing.

The numbers of personnel may be small, and will doubtless fluctuate. But special forces are by their very nature highly effective. Their presence in Ukraine is likely to be seized upon by Moscow, which has in recent months argued that it is not just confronting Ukraine, but Nato as well.

I honestly do not know but, there has been some combat footage posted that had people questioning how far our role is in Ukraine.
They was just randomly posted combat videos with random titles with no mention of the english speaker overheard on video in the group

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
There’s no secret we’ve been feeding them intel and training.

The leaked intel suggests there’s a NATO presence of 100 spec ops. I didn’t see anything that shows they’re actively fighting Russians like the title suggests.

Hehehe

"Its not boots on the ground because they are wearing loafers!"

Its a dangerous semantical game. Especially when we dont know the limits and paramaters?

Like how many is enough? Not 100, ok. 101?

a reply to: JinMI

Well, the document said 100 NATO spec ops, so how many Americans?

Let’s be honest, we all thought it was more even at a support role.

Russia has active operations in Syria after knowing there are actual boots on the ground there. We wipes some of their mercenaries off the earth because Russia wouldn’t admit they were theirs.

Proxy is nothing new.

Knowing how we operated in Afghanistan and Iraq, i figured this was already a foregone conclusion.

I had HOPED it wasnt, but this only gives more amunition for Trump to escalate and on a world stage, lends him so credence to his accusations. I hate that, that man is a tyrant.

Im sure that some people who support what is going on over there will be fine with this, but those people dont understand the implications this could have if they can absolutely, without a doubt, confirm

Civilian fighters that are former military are one thing, but this............

a reply to: CriticalStinker

No, its not new and it wasnt forseen....well, to some here anyway.

Did we get a say or vote in this?

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
There’s no secret we’ve been feeding them intel and training.

The leaked intel suggests there’s a NATO presence of 100 spec ops. I didn’t see anything that shows they’re actively fighting Russians like the title suggests.

Which is EXACTLY how Vietnam started.
Those that forget history are doomed to repeat it .

a reply to: JinMI

No, we didn’t get to vote on it.

Even the last presidential election had two hawkish candidates for Russia/Ukraine.

Trump was the first to provide lethal aid and even pointed out how dovish Obama was.

And we saw what the other option did.

Oh, shock. Not. It's been well-known since the beginning of the conflict that some special ops people have been on the ground in Ukraine. You would have to have been delusional to think otherwise. Now we have to go through a news cycle of "I'm shocked! Shocked, I say!" Good Lord. Get a clue.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

Trump was the first to provide lethal aid and even pointed out how dovish Obama was.

Dovish...i like it.


Anyway, yea, Trump was the first, and its a black mark on him.

For better or worse, it seemed to have an effect on Putins motivations

a reply to: vNex92

It’s almost like we’ve been semi honoring our commitment to the Budapest Memorandum.

I’m sure Russia is completely offended we used an opportunity to weaken them and the eastern sphere of influence.

a reply to: putnam6

Here is twitter video of it labeled as foreign legion, The original Telegram video didnt state that.

Watch both the main video and the video below it.

twitter

a reply to: JinMI

I made a thread back in the day about how silly it was Trump was a stooge for Russia when he had the toughest foreign policy for them in ages.

For better or worse, he is a finger in the air politician. His base is playing contrarian to Russia, so now he is as well. DeSantis has also pulled a 180 since he was always lambasting Obama for not providing lethal aid to Ukraine.

This is forcing the end of globalism though. Buckle up everyone, many asked for it.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

I preferred the bandaid be ripped off more than a decade ago.
But this pustule riddled appendage still needs amputated.