It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
IN LATE JUNE 2019, right after the U.S. Supreme Court released its final opinion of the term, Justice Clarence Thomas boarded a large private jet headed to Indonesia. He and his wife were going on vacation: nine days of island-hopping in a volcanic archipelago on a superyacht staffed by a coterie of attendants and a private chef.
If Thomas had chartered the plane and the 162-foot yacht himself, the total cost of the trip could have exceeded $500,000. Fortunately for him, that wasn’t necessary: He was on vacation with real estate magnate and Republican megadonor Harlan Crow, who owned the jet — and the yacht, too.
For more than two decades, Thomas has accepted luxury trips virtually every year from the Dallas businessman without disclosing them, documents and interviews show. A public servant who has a salary of $285,000, he has vacationed on Crow’s superyacht around the globe. He flies on Crow’s Bombardier Global 5000 jet. He has gone with Crow to the Bohemian Grove, the exclusive California all-male retreat, and to Crow’s sprawling ranch in East Texas. And Thomas typically spends about a week every summer at Crow’s private resort in the Adirondacks.
However, under rules that the federal judicial system adopted to implement that law, judges are free to accept gifts of unlimited value from people without official business before the court.
Scalia was involved in a controversy this year over whether a free plane ride aboard Air Force II to go duck hunting in Louisiana with Vice President Dick Cheney amounted to a gift, at a time when an energy case involving Cheney was before the court.
By law and tradition, the Supreme Court justices are exempt from many rules that govern lesser federal judges. Moreover, each of the justices is free to decide how the general ethics guidelines apply to him or her.
Clarence Thomas is a bought and paid for Supreme Court Justice.
There isn't much more that can be said.
If he had any honor or respect for the bench he would step down.
But let's be honest, we already know he has neither. So he will continue to sit on the bench and make rulings that benefit a certain group of people, conflict of interest be damned.
Foundations, PACS, Dark money, now we find 50% of Dems political donations are being funneled through identity theft victims..... and nobody will do a thing about it.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: infolurker
Foundations, PACS, Dark money, now we find 50% of Dems political donations are being funneled through identity theft victims..... and nobody will do a thing about it.
You can thank Clarence Thomas and the rest of the "conservative" Roberts' court for Citizen United and the oceans of dark money it created.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: infolurker
Foundations, PACS, Dark money, now we find 50% of Dems political donations are being funneled through identity theft victims..... and nobody will do a thing about it.
You can thank Clarence Thomas and the rest of the "conservative" Roberts' court for Citizen United and the oceans of dark money it created.
Political Action Committee (PAC) Spending (2000 to 2014)
Koch Industries: $16.03 million
Soros Fund Management: $0
Lobbying Expenditures (2000 to 2014)
Koch Industries: $97.95 million
Soros Fund Management: $260,000
Open Society Policy Center (Soros-Funded): $42.55 million
Individual Donations to Federal Candidates, Parties, and PACs (1989 to 2014)
Koch Brothers: $2.58 million
George Soros: $1.74 million
Individual Donations to 527 Organizations (1989 to 2010)
Koch Brothers: $1.5 million
George Soros: $32.5 million
Totals
Koch: 118.06 million
Soros: 77.05 million
All figures are courtesy of OpenSecrets.org.
Citizen united was just another tick up in the corruption meter.
A 5–4 majority of the Supreme Court sided with Citizens United, ruling that corporations and other outside groups can spend unlimited money on elections.
But perhaps the most significant outcomes of Citizens United have been the creation of super PACs, which empower the wealthiest donors, and the expansion of dark money through shadowy nonprofits that don’t disclose their donors.