Astra Zenaka banned in Australia

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

Too bad for you that you can never go back on what you've said to support these garbage vaccines, just double down, triple down, and paint yourself in a corner.

17 countries stopped using Astra Zenaka before this, so what is your point? We have seen it has had issues for like 1+ years now, nothing new here with it.

Yes that's correct you are absolutely right!

Tell this to the vaccine apologists and denialists of reality who claim the Astrazeneca vaccine wasn't withdrawn due to health and safety reasons but because of other reasons (according to what source they try to reference).

According to the Australian department of health.

As we have said several times in the past the Astrazeneca vaccine has been withdrawn from most countries that have used it, including the UK that has produced it, for health and safety reasons.

The miracle of science is no longer with us.
Bad news for the vaccine apologists.


Let me phrase it once more for you:

The vaccine ideology is as legit as the transgender ideology.

Stop engaging in vaccine apologetics, denialism of reality and defending of the pharmaceuticals

It's been withdrawn because other vaccines work better. Particularly those scary MRNA ones.

And stop trying shoehorn your personal pet bigotry into unrelated topics.

Probably withdrawn because of climate change and cosmic rays. A much better explanation than yours.

This vaccine ideology is as legitimate as the trans ideology.

It isn't my explanation. It's the reason given by the Australian department of health.

And again, because you have apparent difficulty understanding, the topic is the Astrazeneca vaccine in Australia.

If you want to advertise your bigotry there are plenty of threads on this site to do so.

www.standard.co.uk...


Jack Hurn: Graduate, 26, died due to Covid jab after out-of-date advice at vaccine hub

Birmingham area coroner Emma Brown ruled that Jack Hurn’s death was caused by a rare complication of the AstraZeneca vaccine

Another death by the miracle of science. Note how the newspaper which I assume is British, is trying to blame the out-of-date advise rather than the vaccine. Then it adds the complications are 'rare' at the end.

You have got great reporters and journalists in the UK as it seems. Keep the good work and I am sure the credibility of the press will never be questioned.

a reply to: ScepticScot

I have provided the reason given by the Australian department of health.

Are you saying they are lying?

I think ALL of us have already told you that they are lying in order to CYA for all the damage done.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

Too bad for you that you can never go back on what you've said to support these garbage vaccines, just double down, triple down, and paint yourself in a corner.

17 countries stopped using Astra Zenaka before this, so what is your point? We have seen it has had issues for like 1+ years now, nothing new here with it.

Yes that's correct you are absolutely right!

Tell this to the vaccine apologists and denialists of reality who claim the Astrazeneca vaccine wasn't withdrawn due to health and safety reasons but because of other reasons (according to what source they try to reference).

According to the Australian department of health.

As we have said several times in the past the Astrazeneca vaccine has been withdrawn from most countries that have used it, including the UK that has produced it, for health and safety reasons.

The miracle of science is no longer with us.
Bad news for the vaccine apologists.


Let me phrase it once more for you:

The vaccine ideology is as legit as the transgender ideology.

Stop engaging in vaccine apologetics, denialism of reality and defending of the pharmaceuticals

It's been withdrawn because other vaccines work better. Particularly those scary MRNA ones.

And stop trying shoehorn your personal pet bigotry into unrelated topics.

Probably withdrawn because of climate change and cosmic rays. A much better explanation than yours.

This vaccine ideology is as legitimate as the trans ideology.

It isn't my explanation. It's the reason given by the Australian department of health.

And again, because you have apparent difficulty understanding, the topic is the Astrazeneca vaccine in Australia.

If you want to advertise your bigotry there are plenty of threads on this site to do so.

www.standard.co.uk...


Jack Hurn: Graduate, 26, died due to Covid jab after out-of-date advice at vaccine hub

Birmingham area coroner Emma Brown ruled that Jack Hurn’s death was caused by a rare complication of the AstraZeneca vaccine

Another death by the miracle of science. Note how the newspaper which I assume is British, is trying to blame the out-of-date advise rather than the vaccine. Then it adds the complications are 'rare' at the end.

You have got great reporters and journalists in the UK as it seems. Keep the good work and I am sure the credibility of the press will never be questioned.

As your quote says.

Rare complication.

Antibiotics kill people as well.

Actually that's right you belive we shouldn't use antibiotics that save millions of lifes because of that.

Your opinion on what constitutes safe may be a little off.

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: v1rtu0s0



This is interesting it's from Western Aussie The hermit kingdom just proves that the vaccine was doing a lot of damage from Del Big Tree, most of western Aussie got the jab before the so-called Covid hit. and the hospitals were stuffed and they didn't know why. www.bitchute.com...

Per the excerpt underneath your video dated April 7th, 2023...

Bombshell vaccine safety surveillance data out of Western Australia shows it was reactions from the Covid vaccine that were overwhelming local hospitals. Data shows Australia’s zero-Covid plan was for nothing, as cases have spiked.

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: ScepticScot

I have provided the reason given by the Australian department of health.

Are you saying they are lying?

I think ALL of us have already told you that they are lying in order to CYA for all the damage done.

Who is ALL.

Explain why I should believe the opinion of anonymous online posters on an conspiracy site, many of whom have been wrong over and over again, rather than the reason given by the body making the decision.

a reply to: ScepticScot

The term, "rare complication" has a moving definition based on who you ask too. Here are more specifics inside the article...

A week-long inquest at Birmingham Coroner’s Court was told a GP informed Mr Hurn the risk of blood clots on the brain for his age group was one in 250,000, when the latest NHS guidance estimated it to be one in 50,000.

a reply to: ScepticScot

Explain why I should believe the opinion of anonymous online posters on an conspiracy site, many of whom have been wrong over and over again, rather than the reason given by the body making the decision.

It's called, "common sense". You might want to take a look at the reasons from all of the other countries who stopped using AstraZeneca to make a better informed decision.

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: ScepticScot

The term, "rare complication" has a moving definition based on who you ask too. Here are more specifics inside the article...

A week-long inquest at Birmingham Coroner’s Court was told a GP informed Mr Hurn the risk of blood clots on the brain for his age group was one in 250,000, when the latest NHS guidance estimated it to be one in 50,000.

No link provided but searching shows that was from a case where someone was given the wrong numbers when deciding to go ahead or not with the Astrazeneca vaccine.

At that point the advice was for under 40s to get a different vaccine. That they advise what vaccine is best based on the evidence is hardly indicative of some vast conspiracy to lie about the safety is it?

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

Too bad for you that you can never go back on what you've said to support these garbage vaccines, just double down, triple down, and paint yourself in a corner.

17 countries stopped using Astra Zenaka before this, so what is your point? We have seen it has had issues for like 1+ years now, nothing new here with it.

Yes that's correct you are absolutely right!

Tell this to the vaccine apologists and denialists of reality who claim the Astrazeneca vaccine wasn't withdrawn due to health and safety reasons but because of other reasons (according to what source they try to reference).

According to the Australian department of health.

As we have said several times in the past the Astrazeneca vaccine has been withdrawn from most countries that have used it, including the UK that has produced it, for health and safety reasons.

The miracle of science is no longer with us.
Bad news for the vaccine apologists.


Let me phrase it once more for you:

The vaccine ideology is as legit as the transgender ideology.

Stop engaging in vaccine apologetics, denialism of reality and defending of the pharmaceuticals

It's been withdrawn because other vaccines work better. Particularly those scary MRNA ones.

And stop trying shoehorn your personal pet bigotry into unrelated topics.

Probably withdrawn because of climate change and cosmic rays. A much better explanation than yours.

This vaccine ideology is as legitimate as the trans ideology.

It isn't my explanation. It's the reason given by the Australian department of health.

And again, because you have apparent difficulty understanding, the topic is the Astrazeneca vaccine in Australia.

If you want to advertise your bigotry there are plenty of threads on this site to do so.

www.standard.co.uk...


Jack Hurn: Graduate, 26, died due to Covid jab after out-of-date advice at vaccine hub

Birmingham area coroner Emma Brown ruled that Jack Hurn’s death was caused by a rare complication of the AstraZeneca vaccine

Another death by the miracle of science. Note how the newspaper which I assume is British, is trying to blame the out-of-date advise rather than the vaccine. Then it adds the complications are 'rare' at the end.

You have got great reporters and journalists in the UK as it seems. Keep the good work and I am sure the credibility of the press will never be questioned.

As your quote says.

Rare complication.

Antibiotics kill people as well.

Actually that's right you belive we shouldn't use antibiotics that save millions of lifes because of that.

Your opinion on what constitutes safe may be a little off.

You may have missed the part on the credibility of the British press.

Let me emphasize this again.

Another death by the miracle of science. Note how the newspaper which I assume is British, is trying to blame the out-of-date advise rather than the vaccine. Then it adds the complications are 'rare' at the end.

You have got great reporters and journalists in the UK as it seems. Keep the good work and I am sure the credibility of the press will never be questioned.

Clearly the journalists you have don't have a clue about scientific and medical matters trying to blame an out-of-date advise rather than the vaccine claiming rare complications.

If you haven't realised it yet the article is blow to the credibility of the British reporters. The only thing they got right is that the person died due to the Astrazeneca vaccine.

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: ScepticScot

The term, "rare complication" has a moving definition based on who you ask too. Here are more specifics inside the article...

A week-long inquest at Birmingham Coroner’s Court was told a GP informed Mr Hurn the risk of blood clots on the brain for his age group was one in 250,000, when the latest NHS guidance estimated it to be one in 50,000.

No link provided but searching shows that was from a case where someone was given the wrong numbers when deciding to go ahead or not with the Astrazeneca vaccine.

At that point the advice was for under 40s to get a different vaccine. That they advise what vaccine is best based on the evidence is hardly indicative of some vast conspiracy to lie about the safety is it?

You haven't provided any link either. Your link doesn't work. So try better next time.

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: ScepticScot

Explain why I should believe the opinion of anonymous online posters on an conspiracy site, many of whom have been wrong over and over again, rather than the reason given by the body making the decision.

It's called, "common sense". You might want to take a look at the reasons from all of the other countries who stopped using AstraZeneca to make a better informed decision.

Common sense is that I should believe anonymous conspiracy theorists. OK.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: ScepticScot

The term, "rare complication" has a moving definition based on who you ask too. Here are more specifics inside the article...

A week-long inquest at Birmingham Coroner’s Court was told a GP informed Mr Hurn the risk of blood clots on the brain for his age group was one in 250,000, when the latest NHS guidance estimated it to be one in 50,000.

No link provided but searching shows that was from a case where someone was given the wrong numbers when deciding to go ahead or not with the Astrazeneca vaccine.

At that point the advice was for under 40s to get a different vaccine. That they advise what vaccine is best based on the evidence is hardly indicative of some vast conspiracy to lie about the safety is it?

You haven't provided any link either. Your link doesn't work. So try better next time.

If a broken link is the best counter argument you have what does that tell us?

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: ScepticScot

The term, "rare complication" has a moving definition based on who you ask too. Here are more specifics inside the article...

A week-long inquest at Birmingham Coroner’s Court was told a GP informed Mr Hurn the risk of blood clots on the brain for his age group was one in 250,000, when the latest NHS guidance estimated it to be one in 50,000.

No link provided but searching shows that was from a case where someone was given the wrong numbers when deciding to go ahead or not with the Astrazeneca vaccine.

At that point the advice was for under 40s to get a different vaccine. That they advise what vaccine is best based on the evidence is hardly indicative of some vast conspiracy to lie about the safety is it?

Stop the vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality and stop defending the Pharmaceuticals. Your arguments have been refuted again and again. There is no point going about the same debunked claims.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

Too bad for you that you can never go back on what you've said to support these garbage vaccines, just double down, triple down, and paint yourself in a corner.

17 countries stopped using Astra Zenaka before this, so what is your point? We have seen it has had issues for like 1+ years now, nothing new here with it.

Yes that's correct you are absolutely right!

Tell this to the vaccine apologists and denialists of reality who claim the Astrazeneca vaccine wasn't withdrawn due to health and safety reasons but because of other reasons (according to what source they try to reference).

According to the Australian department of health.

As we have said several times in the past the Astrazeneca vaccine has been withdrawn from most countries that have used it, including the UK that has produced it, for health and safety reasons.

The miracle of science is no longer with us.
Bad news for the vaccine apologists.


Let me phrase it once more for you:

The vaccine ideology is as legit as the transgender ideology.

Stop engaging in vaccine apologetics, denialism of reality and defending of the pharmaceuticals

It's been withdrawn because other vaccines work better. Particularly those scary MRNA ones.

And stop trying shoehorn your personal pet bigotry into unrelated topics.

Probably withdrawn because of climate change and cosmic rays. A much better explanation than yours.

This vaccine ideology is as legitimate as the trans ideology.

It isn't my explanation. It's the reason given by the Australian department of health.

And again, because you have apparent difficulty understanding, the topic is the Astrazeneca vaccine in Australia.

If you want to advertise your bigotry there are plenty of threads on this site to do so.

www.standard.co.uk...


Jack Hurn: Graduate, 26, died due to Covid jab after out-of-date advice at vaccine hub

Birmingham area coroner Emma Brown ruled that Jack Hurn’s death was caused by a rare complication of the AstraZeneca vaccine

Another death by the miracle of science. Note how the newspaper which I assume is British, is trying to blame the out-of-date advise rather than the vaccine. Then it adds the complications are 'rare' at the end.

You have got great reporters and journalists in the UK as it seems. Keep the good work and I am sure the credibility of the press will never be questioned.

As your quote says.

Rare complication.

Antibiotics kill people as well.

Actually that's right you belive we shouldn't use antibiotics that save millions of lifes because of that.

Your opinion on what constitutes safe may be a little off.

You may have missed the part on the credibility of the British press.

Let me emphasize this again.

Another death by the miracle of science. Note how the newspaper which I assume is British, is trying to blame the out-of-date advise rather than the vaccine. Then it adds the complications are 'rare' at the end.

You have got great reporters and journalists in the UK as it seems. Keep the good work and I am sure the credibility of the press will never be questioned.

Clearly the journalists you have don't have a clue about scientific and medical matters trying to blame an out-of-date advise rather than the vaccine claiming rare complications.

If you haven't realised it yet the article is blow to the credibility of the British reporters. The only thing they got right is that the person died due to the Astrazeneca vaccine.

Died due to a rare complication that is openly discussed and included in the advise given about vaccination.

In this case it's your credibility that is woefully lacking

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: ScepticScot

The term, "rare complication" has a moving definition based on who you ask too. Here are more specifics inside the article...

A week-long inquest at Birmingham Coroner’s Court was told a GP informed Mr Hurn the risk of blood clots on the brain for his age group was one in 250,000, when the latest NHS guidance estimated it to be one in 50,000.

No link provided but searching shows that was from a case where someone was given the wrong numbers when deciding to go ahead or not with the Astrazeneca vaccine.

At that point the advice was for under 40s to get a different vaccine. That they advise what vaccine is best based on the evidence is hardly indicative of some vast conspiracy to lie about the safety is it?

You haven't provided any link either. Your link doesn't work. So try better next time.

If a broken link is the best counter argument you have what does that tell us?

First provide a proper link and then you can argue others haven't provided any links. The rest of your arguments have been refuted.

Jack Hurn: Graduate, 26, died due to Covid jab after out-of-date advice at vaccine hub

Birmingham area coroner Emma Brown ruled that Jack Hurn’s death was caused by a rare complication of the AstraZeneca vaccine

a reply to: ScepticScot

Believe what you want it really does not matter anymore. I just hope that there were enough Placebo shots and degraded batches to take the sting out.

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

Too bad for you that you can never go back on what you've said to support these garbage vaccines, just double down, triple down, and paint yourself in a corner.

17 countries stopped using Astra Zenaka before this, so what is your point? We have seen it has had issues for like 1+ years now, nothing new here with it.

Yes that's correct you are absolutely right!

Tell this to the vaccine apologists and denialists of reality who claim the Astrazeneca vaccine wasn't withdrawn due to health and safety reasons but because of other reasons (according to what source they try to reference).

According to the Australian department of health.

As we have said several times in the past the Astrazeneca vaccine has been withdrawn from most countries that have used it, including the UK that has produced it, for health and safety reasons.

The miracle of science is no longer with us.
Bad news for the vaccine apologists.


Let me phrase it once more for you:

The vaccine ideology is as legit as the transgender ideology.

Stop engaging in vaccine apologetics, denialism of reality and defending of the pharmaceuticals

It's been withdrawn because other vaccines work better. Particularly those scary MRNA ones.

And stop trying shoehorn your personal pet bigotry into unrelated topics.

Probably withdrawn because of climate change and cosmic rays. A much better explanation than yours.

This vaccine ideology is as legitimate as the trans ideology.

It isn't my explanation. It's the reason given by the Australian department of health.

And again, because you have apparent difficulty understanding, the topic is the Astrazeneca vaccine in Australia.

If you want to advertise your bigotry there are plenty of threads on this site to do so.

www.standard.co.uk...


Jack Hurn: Graduate, 26, died due to Covid jab after out-of-date advice at vaccine hub

Birmingham area coroner Emma Brown ruled that Jack Hurn’s death was caused by a rare complication of the AstraZeneca vaccine

Another death by the miracle of science. Note how the newspaper which I assume is British, is trying to blame the out-of-date advise rather than the vaccine. Then it adds the complications are 'rare' at the end.

You have got great reporters and journalists in the UK as it seems. Keep the good work and I am sure the credibility of the press will never be questioned.

As your quote says.

Rare complication.

Antibiotics kill people as well.

Actually that's right you belive we shouldn't use antibiotics that save millions of lifes because of that.

Your opinion on what constitutes safe may be a little off.

You may have missed the part on the credibility of the British press.

Let me emphasize this again.

Another death by the miracle of science. Note how the newspaper which I assume is British, is trying to blame the out-of-date advise rather than the vaccine. Then it adds the complications are 'rare' at the end.

You have got great reporters and journalists in the UK as it seems. Keep the good work and I am sure the credibility of the press will never be questioned.

Clearly the journalists you have don't have a clue about scientific and medical matters trying to blame an out-of-date advise rather than the vaccine claiming rare complications.

If you haven't realised it yet the article is blow to the credibility of the British reporters. The only thing they got right is that the person died due to the Astrazeneca vaccine.

Died due to a rare complication that is openly discussed and included in the advise given about vaccination.

In this case it's your credibility that is woefully lacking

Died due to the Astrazeneca vaccine. The rest is just excuses and attempts by the press to blame out of date advise and rare events....

Try better.

Another death by the miracle of science. Note how the newspaper which I assume is British, is trying to blame the out-of-date advise rather than the vaccine. Then it adds the complications are 'rare' at the end.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: ScepticScot

The term, "rare complication" has a moving definition based on who you ask too. Here are more specifics inside the article...

A week-long inquest at Birmingham Coroner’s Court was told a GP informed Mr Hurn the risk of blood clots on the brain for his age group was one in 250,000, when the latest NHS guidance estimated it to be one in 50,000.

No link provided but searching shows that was from a case where someone was given the wrong numbers when deciding to go ahead or not with the Astrazeneca vaccine.

At that point the advice was for under 40s to get a different vaccine. That they advise what vaccine is best based on the evidence is hardly indicative of some vast conspiracy to lie about the safety is it?

Stop the vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality and stop defending the Pharmaceuticals. Your arguments have been refuted again and again. There is no point going about the same debunked claims.

Nothing more convincing that someone claiming to have won online.

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Deetermined
a reply to: ScepticScot

The term, "rare complication" has a moving definition based on who you ask too. Here are more specifics inside the article...

A week-long inquest at Birmingham Coroner’s Court was told a GP informed Mr Hurn the risk of blood clots on the brain for his age group was one in 250,000, when the latest NHS guidance estimated it to be one in 50,000.

No link provided but searching shows that was from a case where someone was given the wrong numbers when deciding to go ahead or not with the Astrazeneca vaccine.

At that point the advice was for under 40s to get a different vaccine. That they advise what vaccine is best based on the evidence is hardly indicative of some vast conspiracy to lie about the safety is it?

Stop the vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality and stop defending the Pharmaceuticals. Your arguments have been refuted again and again. There is no point going about the same debunked claims.

Nothing more convincing that someone claiming to have won online.

Another death by the miracle of science. Note how the newspaper which I assume is British, is trying to blame the out-of-date advise rather than the vaccine. Then it adds the complications are 'rare' at the end.

You have got great reporters and journalists in the UK as it seems. Keep the good work and I am sure the credibility of the press will never be questioned.

Clearly the journalists you have don't have a clue about scientific and medical matters trying to blame an out-of-date advise rather than the vaccine claiming rare complications.

If you haven't realised it yet the article is blow to the credibility of the British reporters. The only thing they got right is that the person died due to the Astrazeneca vaccine.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

Too bad for you that you can never go back on what you've said to support these garbage vaccines, just double down, triple down, and paint yourself in a corner.

17 countries stopped using Astra Zenaka before this, so what is your point? We have seen it has had issues for like 1+ years now, nothing new here with it.

Yes that's correct you are absolutely right!

Tell this to the vaccine apologists and denialists of reality who claim the Astrazeneca vaccine wasn't withdrawn due to health and safety reasons but because of other reasons (according to what source they try to reference).

According to the Australian department of health.

As we have said several times in the past the Astrazeneca vaccine has been withdrawn from most countries that have used it, including the UK that has produced it, for health and safety reasons.

The miracle of science is no longer with us.
Bad news for the vaccine apologists.


Let me phrase it once more for you:

The vaccine ideology is as legit as the transgender ideology.

Stop engaging in vaccine apologetics, denialism of reality and defending of the pharmaceuticals

It's been withdrawn because other vaccines work better. Particularly those scary MRNA ones.

And stop trying shoehorn your personal pet bigotry into unrelated topics.

Probably withdrawn because of climate change and cosmic rays. A much better explanation than yours.

This vaccine ideology is as legitimate as the trans ideology.

It isn't my explanation. It's the reason given by the Australian department of health.

And again, because you have apparent difficulty understanding, the topic is the Astrazeneca vaccine in Australia.

If you want to advertise your bigotry there are plenty of threads on this site to do so.

www.standard.co.uk...


Jack Hurn: Graduate, 26, died due to Covid jab after out-of-date advice at vaccine hub

Birmingham area coroner Emma Brown ruled that Jack Hurn’s death was caused by a rare complication of the AstraZeneca vaccine

Another death by the miracle of science. Note how the newspaper which I assume is British, is trying to blame the out-of-date advise rather than the vaccine. Then it adds the complications are 'rare' at the end.

You have got great reporters and journalists in the UK as it seems. Keep the good work and I am sure the credibility of the press will never be questioned.

As your quote says.

Rare complication.

Antibiotics kill people as well.

Actually that's right you belive we shouldn't use antibiotics that save millions of lifes because of that.

Your opinion on what constitutes safe may be a little off.

You may have missed the part on the credibility of the British press.

Let me emphasize this again.

Another death by the miracle of science. Note how the newspaper which I assume is British, is trying to blame the out-of-date advise rather than the vaccine. Then it adds the complications are 'rare' at the end.

You have got great reporters and journalists in the UK as it seems. Keep the good work and I am sure the credibility of the press will never be questioned.

Clearly the journalists you have don't have a clue about scientific and medical matters trying to blame an out-of-date advise rather than the vaccine claiming rare complications.

If you haven't realised it yet the article is blow to the credibility of the British reporters. The only thing they got right is that the person died due to the Astrazeneca vaccine.

Died due to a rare complication that is openly discussed and included in the advise given about vaccination.

In this case it's your credibility that is woefully lacking

Died due to the Astrazeneca vaccine. The rest is just excuses and attempts by the press to blame out of date advise and rare events....

Try better.

Should we stop using seatbelts?

They sometimes cause serious injuries.