Buying ammunition together, serve the cause of a just peace in Ukraine EU

Another pathetic display of the EU.
According to EU's Josep Borrell.

In Buying ammunition together we are serving cause of a just peace in Ukraine.

Buying ammunition for Ukraine isn't serving cause of a just peace in Ukraine its Escalating war.
As others in the twitter had said Peace is created by negotiations and actual real diplomacy.


Buying Ammunition & Weapons for Peace In Ukraine EU

Its clear on one thing the EU puppets disliked the peace plan by China because of only one reason.

It benefited Russia.

The EU simply believes in the old 1991 agreement at a time when Russia/Soviet Union was collapsing.
The US Rhinos mindset is dead on it.


The same EU currently ignores the living costs protests that are happening in some EU countries.
You would think that the garden would have at least done a better job at providing assistance to the people in the Garden?

Instated of Following the US orders like a pet dog on a leash?

a reply to: vNex92

The best way to serve the cause of peace is not invade a non-threatening foreign country. 👍

a reply to: vNex92

Benefiting Russia at the expense of Ukraine.

Rewarding aggression is not supporting peace.

Russia can have peace at any time just by ending it's invasion.

a reply to: vNex92

Buying ammunition together is perfectly in line with what the original EU idea was: come together to get better prizes by buying more than the individual countries could alone.
I don't know what the surprise in that could possibly be.

Just as I don't get how anyone could have any doubt that this:

It benefited Russia.

is true. Russia can't be allowed to benefit. That's what happens when you're the asshole who starts a war in Europe.
Russia will either stop and retreat or bleed to death you can be sure of that.

I heard a couple of fun rumors lately. About infighting and gradual increase of internal violence.
☠

originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: vNex92

The best way to serve the cause of peace is not invade a non-threatening foreign country. 👍

Hopefully Russia kicks their asses...

Just the one talking point? SMH

OP: I'd give you a billion stars if I could, because in the land of the ignorant the wise man is the fool.

Hmmm... next time i have beef with my neighbor who tore down the garden fence and now stands in my garden after i harassed and terrorized parts of his family for years, a neighbor who is huge and a mean fighting machine, i am gonna ask "our" politicians for money, weapons and ammo. Because, following their logic, this is the best thing to keep peace. I think following that logic they should arm every german citizen again, or am i wrong. If they want peace forever...

I am curious how much and what I get.

You can`t make that sh!t up, the same MSM, the same "politicians", the same liars and agenda pushers who told us for ages that war is bad and peace is good (there was a time where didn`t lie to 100%) try to tell us now that sending more weapons into a local conflict is a guarantee for fast peace. The worst war hawks and and US sycophants are meanwhile Die "Grünen", the "green" party. Their slogan for the last election was: No weapons into war zones. No joke!

And since they somehow got 14.whatever percent in the last elections, they and their Young Global Leader Baerbock act as if they had 99.9% of the voices. And all the other established parties don´t fight that madness that shuts Germany down and drives millions into poverty soon, they all are happy to pave the path for the Great Reset. Because what they do right now fits exactly with the goals of the WEF-NWO (for example you will own nothing "and be happy").

Don´t people see in which crazy times we live meanwhile:

“War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength”

a reply to: MykeNukem

Hopefully Russia kicks their asses...

Looks unlikely doesn't it.

Just the one talking point?

Not much more to say really is there.
Just the usual pro-Putin Kremlin fuelled propaganda isn't it.

SMH

An all too common occurrence for me reading some of the #e posted in these sort of threads.

OP: I'd give you a billion stars if I could, because in the land of the ignorant the wise man is the fool.

I'd give him a star for comedic value but it's become far too boring and predictable.

a reply to: vNex92

Buying ammunition for Ukraine isn't serving cause of a just peace in Ukraine its Escalating war.

It all reads to me like you mean: "Ukrainians are killing massive numbers of Russian soldiers with ammunition and weapons supplied by the West, and Russia will be defeated if it's not stopped. Boohoo, blubber, sob sob, and waah."

a reply to: vNex92

Appeasement of warmongering invaders will not lead to a "just peace".

I get that you don't like the West standing up to a bully like Putin, but, tough.

He badly miscalculated the support for Ukraine from most of the free World.

Whining about it is not going to change that.

If Putin wants peace he can have it. Just get out of Ukraine.

a reply to: MykeNukem

"Hopefully Russia kicks their asses..."

Ukraine's military asses, or civilian asses, or both?

Putin seems pretty good at kicking civilian asses, military ones? Not so much.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: MykeNukem

"Hopefully Russia kicks their asses..."

Ukraine's military asses, or civilian asses, or both?

Putin seems pretty good at kicking civilian asses, military ones? Not so much.

Talking point #2.

Yes, Ukraine is winning.

and losing, and, and, and.....

Winter of Death is still coming.

a reply to: MykeNukem

It's Spring.

You like "Death"?

How nice.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: MykeNukem

It's Spring.

You like "Death"?

How nice.

Yes, I like death.

You're right on point as usual.

That's why I'm for peace negotiations.

Obviously....

a reply to: MykeNukem

There are peace negotiations and then there is rewarding an invading aggressor. That is generally called "appeasement".

Which, as history tells us, encourages further bad stuff.

"As usual"?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: MykeNukem

There are peace negotiations and then there is rewarding an invading aggressor. That is generally called "appeasement".

Which, as history tells us, encourages further bad stuff.

"As usual"?

Rule #3, revert to Talking Point #1, if #2 didn't work.

Well done.

originally posted by: MykeNukem

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: MykeNukem

There are peace negotiations and then there is rewarding an invading aggressor. That is generally called "appeasement".

Which, as history tells us, encourages further bad stuff.

"As usual"?

Rule #3, revert to Talking Point #1, if #2 didn't work.

Well done.

As opposed to a strategy of not actually discussing any of the points raised....

originally posted by: MykeNukem

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: MykeNukem

Rule #1, discuss the topic of the thread. Ie: the cause of a just peace in Ukraine.

Like I said, on topic, appeasement of an unnecessary invasion by an aggressive dictator has generally turned out to be "A Bad Thing".

No?

edit on 4-4-2023 by Oldcarpy2 because: (no reason given)

edit on 4-4-2023 by Oldcarpy2 because: (no reason given)

edit on 4-4-2023 by Oldcarpy2 because: No reason

a reply to: MykeNukem

Rule #1.

Discuss the topic of the thread. Which is the cause of a just peace in Ukraine.

Which appeasement does not help.

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: MykeNukem

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: MykeNukem

There are peace negotiations and then there is rewarding an invading aggressor. That is generally called "appeasement".

Which, as history tells us, encourages further bad stuff.

"As usual"?

Rule #3, revert to Talking Point #1, if #2 didn't work.

Well done.

As opposed to a strategy of not actually discussing any of the points raised....

What was raised?

The 2 MSM talking points?

zZz

a reply to: MykeNukem

Hopefully Russia kicks their asses.

So say the person who maintained he didn't support either side.

Funny Ha Ha .