Donating vaccinated blood or tissue bill in Montana

It looks like Montana might be passing legislation to make donating vaccinated blood or tissue from a vaccinated person a criminal offense. The question is why, and what do they know that has caused this bill to get proffered up for discussion to make this recommendation? So far only hints with regard to the problem with regards to transplants being rejected have gained public attention, corneas from japan were reported as becoming non-viable after vaccination. Is this pointing to another cluster # with regards to this experimental jab? www.bitchute.com...

a reply to: anonentity

We are referring here to Bill 645; Rep. Greg Kmetz, (R- Miles City, Montana) sponsored this bill, which is awaiting process. It was introduced in February of 2023, apparently at the behest of Rep. Jodee Etchart, (R-Billings, Montana).

The arguments in its favor are numerous given the information accumulating about effects of the treatment.

But a substantially important alarm is being raised by the industry about how some 80% of their blood comes from donors who have undergone the experiment.

This is sticky wicket - clearly the reality of the post COVID event world is now becoming more apparent in the halls of power... although few would say Montana is a trail blazing state in that regard.

And if, as the opponents of the bill state, the lack of blood for transfusion would lead to people dying, would we say that these too are deaths resulting from the grand COVID experiment of the early 21st century? Or would they try to make it a morality thing, and blame Joe Public for not accepting "Safe and Effective?"

I take some solace in that the debate is at least happening somewhere... because we are just emerging from a world where that debate not only couldn't happen publicly, it could barely even happen in private.

a reply to: anonentity


sometimes i feel i've got to
run away
i've got to
get away
get away from the tainted blood you've given
stop my heart and that not nearly all

tainted blood
tainted blood

some people had brutal reactions to the vax, I imagine some for of bill is needed to make certain those people dont die when they go in for help.

I think a criminal offense is a bit much, but there should be some way to choose.

Should be a felony. It's basically like people with AIDS donating blood.

Wow I will make sure in case I have to undergo a big procedure, will have my blood taken before, for just in case.

I will never take donate blood that is not mine, I am no vaccinated.

originally posted by: marg6043
Wow I will make sure in case I have to undergo a big procedure, will have my blood taken before, for just in case.

I will never take donate blood that is not mine, I am no vaccinated.

I would recommend everyone do that.

We're going to need a better word for this, calling it vaccinated vs unvaccinated blood makes us sound like crazy people who like polio.

originally posted by: lordcomac
We're going to need a better word for this, calling it vaccinated vs unvaccinated blood makes us sound like crazy people who like polio.

Bioweapon tainted blood.

originally posted by: lordcomac
We're going to need a better word for this, calling it vaccinated vs unvaccinated blood makes us sound like crazy people who like polio.

You are very correct.

I wonder why they can't just label different donated blood separating people who have and haven't had their DNA manipulated? Why is keeping track of that suddenly akin to "rocket science?" They certainly ask before you donate. It's not like they don't know.

Or is it that even the vaccinated don't want "vaccinated' blood? Can anyone say?

a reply to: Maxmars

Or it could be that blood group O being the universal donor, has been stuffed up and no longer has the Universal component.

a reply to: anonentity

Surely the unjabbed O's won't experience that problem!

This bill has been dead since March 11th.

Never made it past the first reading in committee. Tabled by a vote of 19 - 1.

a reply to: Montana

Thanks for that.

Often we miss the Bills that are publicity fodder and efforts to pander to populism because we are ignorant of their disposition. Then we (or I) go on ranting like it still matters.... But that is one of the perils of relying on video sources with titles that are meant to garner 'clicks.'

a reply to: Maxmars

Bill Crenshaw says it has not passed, but those that killed it will probably kill the guy that filled it.

At first glance my immediate thought is because that blood and tissue is now a proprietary substance and cannot be donated without corporate head office giving the nod.

a reply to: anonentity

a reply to: anonentity

o- universal
That's my blood type.... Unjabbed no one gets my blood
The energy exchange would be too much.... Having my blood inside someone else ..the link that would create .... Unless I become the dominant energy and harvest them or somehow use it to my advantage 🤔🤔🤔blood magic

a reply to: Montana

whelp. there goes my moment of excitement.
"Oh wow, Montana on the first page of ATS? For something AWESOME!?"

"......jk"