It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: ketsuko
So why are drag queens the special unicorns who suddenly are absolutely necessarily to teach this?
This isn't about drag queens teaching children anything. It's about their ability to freely express themselves in public.
The thing is about our constitutional republic is, even drag queen have constitutional rights.
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: ketsuko
So why are drag queens the special unicorns who suddenly are absolutely necessarily to teach this?
This isn't about drag queens teaching children anything. It's about their ability to freely express themselves in public.
The thing is about our constitutional republic is, even drag queen have constitutional rights.
Yes.. teaching children in schools about the existence of 72 genders and whatever other delusion they have in their minds. Drag queens have no place in schools as they are not teachers and they intentionally engaging in misinformation and disinformation propagating their unsubstantiated views and delusions.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: ketsuko
So why are drag queens the special unicorns who suddenly are absolutely necessarily to teach this?
This isn't about drag queens teaching children anything. It's about their ability to freely express themselves in public.
The thing is about our constitutional republic is, even drag queen have constitutional rights.
Yes.. teaching children in schools about the existence of 72 genders and whatever other delusion they have in their minds. Drag queens have no place in schools as they are not teachers and they intentionally engaging in misinformation and disinformation propagating their unsubstantiated views and delusions.
Then this bill isn't for you, because it does nothing to prevent a school from inviting a guest speaker to teach gender expression in 72 ways. It doesn't even stop a trans teacher from getting hired and teaching 3rd grade.
No. You are.
I'm talking about the law that the judge put a TRO on and why. It has nothing to do with groomers influencing children in a captive environment.
SECTION 1. Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 7-51-1401,is amended by adding the following language as a new subdivision:"Adult cabaret performance" means a performance in a location other than an adult cabaret that features topless dancers, go-go dancers, exotic dancers, strippers, male or female impersonators who provide entertainment that appeals to a prurient interest, or similar entertainers, regardless of whether or not performed for consideration;
prurient - adjectivehaving or encouraging an excessive interest in sexual matters.
What one is wearing doesn't define obscene.
live and let live and get over the fact that drag queens have constitutional rights too.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Ahabstar
No, not all is. But drag is not Mrs. Doubtfire either.
oh right. Redirect this smut to the family. You know that the ruling Marxist party vows to abolish the “bourgeois family!” It’s always good when people out themselves.
originally posted by: malte85
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: vNex92
Nice try, he was a Trump appointee.
Interesting to see you support drag shows for children.
oh come on, you don't give a damn about kids. what about these baby and children's beauty contests where little girls pose on stage in bikinis or sexy outfits in front of some jury and lots of other adults. they exist for decades and still happening nowadays, mainly in america. where is the outrage?
freddy mercury would laugh his head off at you holy patriots. anyway, real child abuse still takes place within the family and in every second somewhere in the world. but that doesn't interest you either, right?
originally posted by: sarahvital
how do you know
it's really a guy under those black robes?
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Sookiechacha
IMO, anyone who opposes this law is supporting the sexualization of children. That is simply sick ad twisted.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Asmodeus3
Then this bill isn't for you, because it does nothing to prevent a school from inviting a guest speaker to teach gender expression in 72 ways. It doesn't even stop a trans teacher from getting hired and teaching 3rd grade.
originally posted by: vNex92
I am sure 7,11 year old boys would love to dress up as drags right?
Because that is what normal boys do right?
So you admit you are arguing for something that is not even pertinent to the thread?
This law only applies to sexually-charged exhibitions.
This law only applies to sexually-charged exhibitions.
No, but clothing may be used to create a prurient atmosphere. Are you claiming that sheer lingerie is not sexual in nature now?
There is no Constitutional right to harm children.