It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

21 Videos Of Collapsing Musicians And TV Personalities Live On Air Since April 2021

page: 1
20
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 26 2023 @ 12:20 PM
link   
We've all seen videos of the nearly 2000 athletes collapsing and over 1200 dying while in the middle of competition in the last 2 years. There was a lot of debate on ATS about if this was "normal" but people with common sense knew it was not: SOURCE



Recently Dr. Makis put together a video compilation of 21 separate incidents caught on live TV of musicians and TV anchors collapsing inexplicably. This is another subgroup of people that seem to be susceptible to this new phenomena of sudden loss of consciousness. If this is happening at such a rate that it's being caught on live TV with such regularity then how much is it happening in the unrecorded population? It must be astronomical.

SOURCE - 21 Collapses

I have embedded a few of the clips below.














edit on 26-3-2023 by v1rtu0s0 because: (no reason given)

edit on 26-3-2023 by v1rtu0s0 because: (no reason given)

edit on 26-3-2023 by v1rtu0s0 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 26 2023 @ 12:36 PM
link   
A couple of points. Seems like most are women, I wonder why... How many were vacced? As to Musicians, I would bet my bottom dollar there are some good drugs involved. I think we have a serious drug problem on a scale people just do not want to think about. It is crazy how many young people casually say "oh I take antidepressant."

You and I can debate vaccines until the cows come home, but people taking a cocktail of drugs year in, and year out is really doing a number on them, especially healthy young people.


edit on 26-3-2023 by Xtrozero because: (no reason given)


+7 more 
posted on Mar, 26 2023 @ 12:40 PM
link   
That Heather Mcdonald video.....wow!

First she is declaring all the vaccines and boosters she has taken then makes a joke about Jesus and passes out in front of everybody.

She hit the ground hard too.

That was the Lord saying stop spreading lies.
edit on 26-3-2023 by GoShredAK because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 26 2023 @ 12:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xtrozero
A couple of points. Seems like most are women, I wonder why... How many were vacced? As to Musicians, I would bet my bottom dollar there are some good drugs involved. I think we have a serious drug problem on a scale people just do not want to think about. It is crazy howe many young people casually say "oh I take antidepressant."

You and I can debate vaccines until the cows come home, but people taking a cocktail of drugs year in and year out is really doing a number on them, especially healthy young people.



Trying to pretend it's normal is being a denialist. And pretending like it's from anything but the vaccine (ABTV) is falling for the propaganda. It's not normal. And there are more videos than this. I've never seen young healthy people collapsing at this rate on live TV considering I've never seen it happen before period but here's 21 examples in 2 years and there are a lot more than that.



posted on Mar, 26 2023 @ 12:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0






in the interest of facts, and reality, it would be good to see this same data set over a several year period so we can filter out the normal from the abnormal. My paycheck is the same regardless of the outcome, so I'm hoping for real facts and truth. I'm not fearful of either answer, I hope others would be the same, rather than dig in and ignore facts. (both sides)



posted on Mar, 26 2023 @ 01:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0






in the interest of facts, and reality, it would be good to see this same data set over a several year period so we can filter out the normal from the abnormal. My paycheck is the same regardless of the outcome, so I'm hoping for real facts and truth. I'm not fearful of either answer, I hope others would be the same, rather than dig in and ignore facts. (both sides)



The data exists already. People keep saying we need to get this data and that data. It's already been done.



posted on Mar, 26 2023 @ 01:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

SOURCE - 21 Collapses



As example, here is the follow-up on Carlson...


Carlson, who is also a health coach, revealed she checked into the hospital following her loss of consciousness while trying to give a weather report. She said though she has a history of fainting she had been worried she might be having a heart attack but that medical tests revealed it wasn’t heart-related. Instead, she said, it was related to a previous diagnosis of vasovagal syncope.


On a bigger scale if this many random collapsing on TV was due to the vaccine, then I would think we would be seeing millions of people just walking and collapsing all around us too. I'm not going to investigate each one for you, but it seems there is a connection of longer-term events well before the vaccine.


edit on 26-3-2023 by Xtrozero because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 26 2023 @ 01:56 PM
link   
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Okay a few things to notice here.

1. The people who are Standing up right before they collapse are likely Locking there Knees , This is a very common thing and if you lock your knees for to long the blood-flow to your brain will slow and you will pass out . I saw it in the military all the time people standing in formation would just fall out.

2. Most of these people passing out in the videos are woman ? Not sure if that means something but I'm just pointing it out.

That being said the people who are seated while they pass out are clearly having strokes , The way there eyes dart up and the head starts with the wobble then they go out. That is a Stroke plain and simple and sure the Vaccine could be accounted for that who knows.



posted on Mar, 26 2023 @ 02:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: network dude

in the interest of facts, and reality, it would be good to see this same data set over a several year period so we can filter out the normal from the abnormal. My paycheck is the same regardless of the outcome, so I'm hoping for real facts and truth. I'm not fearful of either answer, I hope others would be the same, rather than dig in and ignore facts. (both sides)


So, looking into it all most of the numbers we see come from goodsciencing.com and those are pulled mostly out of blogs and other unsearchable sources. When people and other journalist investigate many of these people are not even vacced, or have longer history of issues. This is not to say the vaccines have caused zero issues, just that there is a lot of hyperbole going on that doesn't help in the least.



posted on Mar, 26 2023 @ 02:19 PM
link   
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

I'm loving this new approach to COVID denialism.

After EVERY single scam fell through, like ivermectin and bleach and hydroxychloroquine, and whatever else you guys were making up or parroting for others...

...your current posts and approach are soooo... vague. Very, very vague. You no longer post any evidence, you no longer engage in anything that can be easily debunked. All of a sudden every post is so vague and could apply to anything, all in the interest of making it more difficult to debunk -- but that's only because there is nothing to debunk!

21 people collapsed from heat stroke! Oh no, could it be that they were vaccinated! Oh noes! The end.

And you post zero link or evidence between the two, zilch, nada... all just baseless speculation that no one with even a high school education would fall for.

But it is entertaining to watch, I'm loving how you all gave up on any facts or evidence.



posted on Mar, 26 2023 @ 02:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Mahogany




21 people collapsed from heat stroke! Oh no, could it be that they were vaccinated! Oh noes! The end.


Heat Stroke ? Most of these people were inside a climate controlled room when they collapsed , So nope not heat stroke . If your gonna attempt to pull attention away from the Vaccine at least do so in an educated way.

If you actually paid attention which you clearly don't , you would notice most of the people collapsing are Woman in High heels . Combine high heels with locking your knees plus standing in place for a long period of time it Equals passing out.

But a few of those people who passed out were sitting down and clearly had actual Strokes but most were woman in high heels locking there knees .

P.S. you are clearly a member who has abandoned another account , you remind me of ' Southern Guardian ' don't tell me if I'm right just remain silent .
edit on 26-3-2023 by asabuvsobelow because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 26 2023 @ 02:54 PM
link   
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

People passing out on TV was almost unheard of pre-vax, anyone who denies there's been an increase is being disingenuous. I watch a lot of football, always have and until 2020 i'd been aware of 2 or 3 players collapsing on the pitch in my lifetime. At one point during the height of the vaccination schedule it was happening monthly.

Has anyone else noticed a lot of our vaccine apologists and ultra left crowd on ATS have disappeared recently as well?

Here's another few from the UK.





Difficult to pass this one off:


edit on 26/3/23 by Grenade because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 26 2023 @ 04:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0






in the interest of facts, and reality, it would be good to see this same data set over a several year period so we can filter out the normal from the abnormal. My paycheck is the same regardless of the outcome, so I'm hoping for real facts and truth. I'm not fearful of either answer, I hope others would be the same, rather than dig in and ignore facts. (both sides)


Like with the atheletes collapsing there isn't much academic study of it prior to 2021.

That means that either it was happening just like it is now and somehow nobody noticed (odd given we've been saturated with cameras for over a decade) or it wasn't happening so was not studied due to little consequence.

That it's happening with a backdrop of consistent excess deaths in the double digits also correlating to vaccine rollout removes much of the ambiguity for those paying attention. Most of the atheletes and entertainers in the West were required to be vaccinated if they were actively performing and they also tell us the vast majority of the population have been vaccinated. If these atheletes and performers are not increases above baseline then that means they are not part of the excess death numbers. So then, where are the relatively young people dying if these public deaths are totally normal and part of expected excess deaths?

Essentially the pro-vax tactic is now just a shell game. It has nothing to do with curiosity, otherwise we might be seeing some effort to discover the cause. It's purely about vaccine defense. Nothing is from the vax even when it's from conditions listed as side-effects, but all their defense of the vaccine does is shift the excess deaths somewhere else. It is undeniable that excess deaths are higher than expected mostly in demographics at no risk from COVID and have remained there since shortly after vaccine rollout.

As of yet I've only seen half-hearted parroting of things like delayed treatment and other things that do not fit the numbers. There are not increases in rare cancers in young people because of delayed treatment. Many of the excuses being used work okay if you ignore all the other data, but collectively there is no way to make those numbers make sense. So the shell game moves them around and the evil anti-vaxers can never pin them on vaccines. A 10-20% rise in the total excess deaths of an entire population cannot be explained by 10-20% rises that only involve small target groups. If so those target groups would see much higher rates, 50-100%+, and that's just how numbers work. For small groups to have a large impact on total aggregate numbers it has to be very pronounced. Where are they?

The number of prominent experts coming out for a complete halt of mRNA vaccines is growing larger, which naturally is not reported by a media that gets massive amounts of money from pharma sponsorship. This is why the data had to be hidden and all all dissent had to be censored to the point of demonizing those presenting it. They couldn't risk these unencumbered experts getting exposed to data that showed the fraud too early. They had to leverage institutional trust, while engaging in unprecedented levels of censorship, even if it meant that trust would be destroyed for decades into the future. That's how much they wanted this in your body. That loss of trust was a known outcome. We knew about this in public health for decades, we figured it into our plans how we maintain public trust and knew the consequences of losing it were dire. The contracts were already made, so they already were making money. Fauci, the CDC, the FDA, all still burned that essential public trust while knowing the consequences. Why so desperate to get an ineffective temporary "vaccine" into the whole population as fast as possible under enormous pressure?

It was always just a matter of time. It's too big to hide. Maybe they really were just hoping for the problems from trials and past studies to magically disappear and for no more to show up, but that just makes it negligent rather than criminal. The attempts to cover it up are criminal either way. There are deeper psychological reasons too, directed at the population, but that is more complicated than I feel like fleshing out. In about three more years we'll have the first complete picture, even with their attempts to hide and manipulate it.



posted on Mar, 26 2023 @ 04:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ksihkehe

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0






in the interest of facts, and reality, it would be good to see this same data set over a several year period so we can filter out the normal from the abnormal. My paycheck is the same regardless of the outcome, so I'm hoping for real facts and truth. I'm not fearful of either answer, I hope others would be the same, rather than dig in and ignore facts. (both sides)


Like with the atheletes collapsing there isn't much academic study of it prior to 2021.

That means that either it was happening just like it is now and somehow nobody noticed (odd given we've been saturated with cameras for over a decade) or it wasn't happening so was not studied due to little consequence.

That it's happening with a backdrop of consistent excess deaths in the double digits also correlating to vaccine rollout removes much of the ambiguity for those paying attention. Most of the atheletes and entertainers in the West were required to be vaccinated if they were actively performing and they also tell us the vast majority of the population have been vaccinated. If these atheletes and performers are not increases above baseline then that means they are not part of the excess death numbers. So then, where are the relatively young people dying if these public deaths are totally normal and part of expected excess deaths?

Essentially the pro-vax tactic is now just a shell game. It has nothing to do with curiosity, otherwise we might be seeing some effort to discover the cause. It's purely about vaccine defense. Nothing is from the vax even when it's from conditions listed as side-effects, but all their defense of the vaccine does is shift the excess deaths somewhere else. It is undeniable that excess deaths are higher than expected mostly in demographics at no risk from COVID and have remained there since shortly after vaccine rollout.

As of yet I've only seen half-hearted parroting of things like delayed treatment and other things that do not fit the numbers. There are not increases in rare cancers in young people because of delayed treatment. Many of the excuses being used work okay if you ignore all the other data, but collectively there is no way to make those numbers make sense. So the shell game moves them around and the evil anti-vaxers can never pin them on vaccines. A 10-20% rise in the total excess deaths of an entire population cannot be explained by 10-20% rises that only involve small target groups. If so those target groups would see much higher rates, 50-100%+, and that's just how numbers work. For small groups to have a large impact on total aggregate numbers it has to be very pronounced. Where are they?

The number of prominent experts coming out for a complete halt of mRNA vaccines is growing larger, which naturally is not reported by a media that gets massive amounts of money from pharma sponsorship. This is why the data had to be hidden and all all dissent had to be censored to the point of demonizing those presenting it. They couldn't risk these unencumbered experts getting exposed to data that showed the fraud too early. They had to leverage institutional trust, while engaging in unprecedented levels of censorship, even if it meant that trust would be destroyed for decades into the future. That's how much they wanted this in your body. That loss of trust was a known outcome. We knew about this in public health for decades, we figured it into our plans how we maintain public trust and knew the consequences of losing it were dire. The contracts were already made, so they already were making money. Fauci, the CDC, the FDA, all still burned that essential public trust while knowing the consequences. Why so desperate to get an ineffective temporary "vaccine" into the whole population as fast as possible under enormous pressure?

It was always just a matter of time. It's too big to hide. Maybe they really were just hoping for the problems from trials and past studies to magically disappear and for no more to show up, but that just makes it negligent rather than criminal. The attempts to cover it up are criminal either way. There are deeper psychological reasons too, directed at the population, but that is more complicated than I feel like fleshing out. In about three more years we'll have the first complete picture, even with their attempts to hide and manipulate it.




Exactly, the lack of curiosity is criminal. Its simply a defense of the vaxx at all costs while ignoring the problem.

It's the same thing with public health, ignoring the huge increase in all cause mortality, death from all causes while only focusing on one thing, coronavirus, because you can politicize it and use it to control people. Public Health has zero to do with lowering the death rate.



posted on Mar, 26 2023 @ 05:15 PM
link   
a reply to: Mahogany

The internet has been around since the 90s YouTube has been around almost as long. I have seen everything from news reporters getting whacked with stop signs, to floating heads because of green outfits and green screens. But not once have I ever seen a reporter have their eyes roll back and pass out. Til vaccines hit.

I am near 40years old, and that my friend is a lot of news watching. If that doesn't scream something is seriously wrong, then I can't help you.

It doesn't matter what is causing it, the fact is NONE of this happened from 1990-2018. I have seen news reporters trip over curbs, get hit by cars and more. Not once have I seen reporters pass out without physical blows/contact with something.

These women are young, not obese and should NOT be having strokes. So argue your point and ask where the facts are, those are the facts. It's indisputable.

Something changed, and is killing people and it ain't climate. So if you want to ignore it. I pray you don't go through it.

Cause one thing I have realized over the years is people who have never lost a love one unexpectedly can't fathom or comprehend death on this scale.. They might say "oh so sorry" feel sad for a day or two, but otherwise live their lives..

Because they have no real connection with loss. So they remain ignorant of that, unless they are moved by the crowd(which is why they can return back to normal after shedding a few tears over friends).. Kids usually can recover and remain oblivious and never realize why sad moments make them cry but adults.. that crap sticks with em for life.

I ain't talking about loss of friends. I am talking loss of actual family members. Especially sudden and unexpected death.

These people who are blessed not to lose their most treasured connection I found more likely to agree with the narrative that it isn't the vaccine killing people. Those that have, have a keen sense of death(connection to it)and are aware when massive amounts of people die mysteriously. Because it triggers that connection.

Expected deaths are also different then unexpected, and I did not include expected deaths in this analysis.
edit on 50520235131 by BlackArrow because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 26 2023 @ 05:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Ksihkehe

The Banks Big Pharma the media the governments are all owned by one entity. The economy by any logical analysis is finished, it is only running on air. The big boys have to rely on big government contracts funded by the taxpayer, or they would have collapsed long since. These contracts payout in diminishing fiat. In fact, they are wrapping this economy up with their actions They must be transferring the fiat into assets, which is land. The banks will ultimately own the repossessed houses. As general sickness intensifies, the supply chains collapse, and the medical establishments will not be able to cope, The economy is in a doom loop where it has only itself to feed off. The next stage will be the lack of drugs which will start to kill off those hanging in there. The media threats of war and "for your own good" control the population The good news is you can get out because when the cities collapse you will not want to be there. Anyone with the slightest understanding won't rock the boat by waving a flag, they are too busy organizing something sustainable for themselves and their families.



posted on Mar, 26 2023 @ 05:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: Mahogany
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

I'm loving this new approach to COVID denialism.

After EVERY single scam fell through, like ivermectin and bleach and hydroxychloroquine, and whatever else you guys were making up or parroting for others...

...your current posts and approach are soooo... vague. Very, very vague. You no longer post any evidence, you no longer engage in anything that can be easily debunked. All of a sudden every post is so vague and could apply to anything, all in the interest of making it more difficult to debunk -- but that's only because there is nothing to debunk!

21 people collapsed from heat stroke! Oh no, could it be that they were vaccinated! Oh noes! The end.

And you post zero link or evidence between the two, zilch, nada... all just baseless speculation that no one with even a high school education would fall for.

But it is entertaining to watch, I'm loving how you all gave up on any facts or evidence.


I smell a Doctors hunt instead a dear hunt coming sooner than later.



posted on Mar, 26 2023 @ 05:43 PM
link   
a reply to: BlackArrow

Sigh. A 15 second search looking for prior to 2018. I'm sure if you search prior to 2020 it'll be even more. And this is specific to fainting. Broaden the search there will be even more.

Google search

Just because you didn't pay attention or see it, does not mean it didn't happen prior to 2020. No one ever fainted before apparently. My mom used to always faint when it was that time of the month. I always fainted at least once while pregnant. Half my school class fainted at some point in church over 12 years.

Could it be vaccination related? Possibly, but attributing every fainting episode to the vaccination is careless and false. It takes only a few minutes to vet a video before you post it making random assumptions.



posted on Mar, 26 2023 @ 06:04 PM
link   
a reply to: Ksihkehe

No but it is accounted for, I think people have a misconception on what "excess deaths mean".
Every so many years depending on where you live you do a housing survey called a census. This census believe it or not tracks everything from job, to race, to new babies and more. It also pairs with a medical database.

Every year the estimated deaths include up words of 5% depending on professions of sudden death. The estimated deaths are also on a scale for various categories based off 2-300years of census data. As new technology comes out they compensate estimates to include these numbers for "accidental deaths".

Examples of people on the estimated charts is usually 8-12% new Borns, anyone who was diagnosed with a critical condition like cancer. Even if it goes into remission your name remains on the expected death list til the day you die. Every year we lose up words of 20fire fighters to accidental deaths, traffic, guns, gang related deaths it's ALL already counted for. This also includes morbidly obese people. When a doctor tells you your morbidly obese your put into the estimated deaths until you either lose the weight or die.

This also holds true for anyone over the age of 75. You are put on the expected death list til you die. Even if you live to be 100 it just means you were on that list for 25years.

Now excess deaths is anything that goes over the calculated estimates based off historical records and population growth, crime rate, population health averages, age.

So when they say birth death rates are up 750% this means that they take that 12% total births per year and add 750% to that to get the total of excess deaths involving birth. Same holds true for cancer, example by default the government calculates a good 10% of cancer patients as undiagnosed. So when they say the estimated number is blah, those unaccounted for deaths (unexpected), are already included in the expected category.

As with cancer excess if they say excess deaths is up 1400%. They take the total population (not dead, with cancer apply 5-10% of the expected deaths as an estimated so if 20 people have cancer they will add 2 more just because of undiagnosed conditions). These are accounted for. So when they say cancer rates has skyrocketed 1400% it means that those 22 people grew by 1400%, and those 22 people are not in the excess list as they are expected to die.

So the excess list is literally anything that goes above and beyond the estimates based off historical records.

I think people seem to think that when a person is diagnosed they aren't included in that list, even if they don't die that year. But the sad part is that they are expected to die until the confirmed death(death certificates get sent to government from either Dr or patients family as confirmation.)


Keep in mind these are examples, not factual numbers based on current statistics. I just used examples to explain how excess and estimates work.
edit on 60620233431 by BlackArrow because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 26 2023 @ 06:07 PM
link   
a reply to: frogs453

Oh no I expect a good 3% to feint even if I am not watching. If you read my last post you will see my argument in actual detail. I didn't mean it as it never happening. Period. But I am saying that when you have 10tox or CNN reporters or MSN all black out under 1 company in a year that is excess.

I expect those that report in other countries to have more difficulty. Because of conditions. I don't expect 20 reporters in the US to feint in a single year. Or even two, that to me is excess. Anything over 5(generous stretch) is considered excess. Especially if they all have the same patterns. Then when you realize that what your seeing up front on camera, is happening to other people off camera as well. As most of those reporters are only live for between 1-3 minutes on average. That is why you should be concerned with the sheer amount of live collapses.

Which is why I went into detail about excess verses expected. In the post above this one.

Even in historical averages of sports you estimate a total of 10ish players to be injured every year. In one category of sports, however if they exceed what is expected it gets added to the excess list. The excess list does not include expected injuries based off historical, and population data(example a new team, or a team that no longer plays). It's all accounted for.

When I count news reporters blacking out, I count health conditions dehydration, accidents, so when I said that nothing like this has happened in the past. I ment nothing like this has happened in the past taking those things into consideration, aka hazards of the job.

But you know they stopped sending people with severe medical conditions onto the field don't you? They did this years ago, for legal reasons.

I just get a little tired of the twisted numbers people keep throwing out, hell I heard from politicians that 1400 trains derail each year. Did research and found that it is NOT true. That's only the total of derailments since the world started using trains. But that number also counts other countries historical records as well.
edit on 60620230031 by BlackArrow because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
20
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join