How We Are Lied To About Aliens And The People Living Inside The Earth

a reply to: andy06shake

Lol you are funny!

The evidence has been given, you just chose to ignore and call names! Low vibration often yields poor results! The opportunity is over. Quit begging for the proof, just try harder next time!

a reply to: combatmaster

Yeh silly YouTube videos, hours long, that you refuse to summarise, probably because you have not even bothered to watch yourself, featuring religious rabbi, touting gibberish and mysticism, as opposed to actual science and facts, and laced with agenda, don't constitute evidence or anything reminiscent of such.

If our Earth is hollow then you will be able to explain why gravity is not a hell of a lot weaker on the surface where we reside for a start.

A fact that i notice you fail to even address.

Let's just start with that conundrum, shall we?

Now where opportunity is concerned well you have been given plenty of those to provide tangible evidence to support your claim and seem to come up short of providing any sort of meaningful answer every time.

As to begging, is that you back in fantasy land again?

a reply to: combatmaster

Kaballah is very interesting and so is the youtube channel you mentioned. I think the hesitation to go over such channels is that it takes a lot of time and effort to listen to this information. And who knows if this person really has insight and understanding to these mysteries. Not to mention, when religion is involved it is a turn off for many.

I'm not discouraging viewing though. I'll definietly take a look. Sometimes we're just tired of combing through hours of information, only to still be unsure what the truth is.

I'm starting to try and learn remote viewing. Hopefully this will provide some evidence to the things I hear others speak about. It's very hard to try and discern who knows what they're talking about and who doesn't. Unless you're someone who has hours every day to research things.

a reply to: andy06shake

I think if you're looking for actual science and facts to provide evidence for things that are beyond our current understaning of reality then you'll just find a dead end.

Hollow Earth may be another dimension and not an actual physical third dimensional place inside earth. I don't blame you for doubting the poster, but I find it pointless to argue and ask to use science and facts when very little exist in these subjects.

Tangible evidence is something you're not going to get. Woo woo land has plenty of truths in it, but also chalk full of lies. I don't see the point of asking for some smoking gun when there is none.

a reply to: Turquosie

What do you mean, may be another dimension and not an actual Physical Third Dimensional place inside earth. That sounds like something a child would say, it makes no sense. You exist in a 3 dimensional world, x,y, &z axis and a possible 4th Time a 3 dimensional object moving within a 3 dimensional space. I can not understand what your talking about, what a dimension out side of the 3 or 4 dimensions , most are aware of. Did you mean within the known 3 dimensional Earth plane.
I don't see that being able to work, it would be a bit crowded. I don't see anyway the entire earth would be hollow, if anything it would be more like chambers, I also would find it hard to have a central sun. I look more in terms that someone sought protection on the enterior of the earth,, like what people are doing now with the Billionaire bunkers, they are building all over. Or in Russian they have the whole inside of a mountain hollowed out, they say it's the size of DC, that's Washington DC.
No hollow earth bull.

a reply to: Turquosie

I think if you're looking for actual science and facts to provide evidence for things that are beyond our current understaning of reality then you'll just find a dead end.

The thing is its not beyond our current understanding to be able to determine that the Earth is not hollow.

Because if she was hollow the distribution of mass within the planet would be very different from what it is now.

Hence the gravitational force at the surface where we reside would be much weaker than it is now, which it is not.

Hollow Earth may be another dimension and not an actual physical third dimensional place inside earth. I don't blame you for doubting the poster, but I find it pointless to argue and ask to use science and facts when very little exist in these subjects.

It also might be a complete and utter hoax or nothing more than wishful thinking.

You see the notion of a hollow Earth has been present in various mythologies and cultures throughout history without any sort of tangible evidence to back up the claims.

But hey'ho if people cannot explain something like the lack of the place's existence for a start let's just place it in an alternate reality, aka somewhere that cannot be measured or observed.

That must be where all those odd socks disappear to when only one of the pair comes out of the dryer, the other never to be seen or heard from again, they will be lying in a big massive pile at Agartha for sure.

Tangible evidence is something you're not going to get. Woo woo land has plenty of truths in it, but also chalk full of lies. I don't see the point of asking for some smoking gun when there is none.

To be honest i did not expect any sort of tangible evidence since there is none to be had regarding the topic.

The problem being modern scientific understanding of the interior of the Earth based on seismic scientific studies and other measurements, proved the Earth is not hollow, but consists of several layers, including a solid inner core, a liquid outer core, a mantle, and the crust, on top of which our civilisation resides.

Now where combatmaster and smoking guns are concerned, well he would have you believe his mad rabbi on YouTube, touting gibberish and mysticism, has one of those.

And all the evidence that is required in spades to prove the nonsensical notion, which is most definitely not the case.

As to the point, well that would be that the Earth is not hollow as science and physics have clearly proven.

It's not my first trip down the rabbit hole Turquosie, ive been into this kind of stuff since the mid-90s, the trick is you learn to take it with a pinch of salt, or else down that road lies madness and insanity, quite literally sometimes.

I don't see much point in going on about Hollow Earth when there is none, obviously, some people do, again that's what we call wishful thinking because they want it to be true as it somehow makes them feel special.

a reply to: OOOOOO

I take it he means an alternate reality as opposed to the mathematical sorts of dimension used to define the properties of a physical system or space aka length, width, and height.

a reply to: andy06shake

You are obviously opposed to any notion of anything that is immeasurable by current means. No love for you i guess. Those means will change in the future. This is going in circles.

a reply to: combatmaster

You are obviously opposed to any notion of anything that is immeasurable by current means.

And you obviously still don't have any sort of proof or tangible facts to present to support the nonsense your punting.

No love for you i guess.

It's not about love, it's about you being able to prove the claims which you make, which you cannot because the Earth simply is not hollow.

Those means will change in the future.

Progress is indeed a thing from a technological standpoint, but without somehow being able to step outside of space-time, we are never going to be able to measure or observe other universes/realities.

That kind of technology might be somewhat above humanity's paygrade, bordering on omnipotence.

This is going in circles.

Well, im not the one refusing to answer questions or is unable to refute the scientific evidence that proves hollow Earth is a myth.

It's going in circles because you refuse to accept reality and choose to embrace ignorance and pseudoscientific mumbo-jumbo.

a reply to: andy06shake

We shall see!

I find the ideas here interesting, but the presentation disappointing. How can any be expected to discuss this seriously with such a scattered OP?

Hollow earth, and the idea of “aliens” being terrestrial make more sense than some of the more prevalent ideas out there.

a reply to: OOOOOO

originally posted by: ITSALIVE
I find the ideas here interesting, but the presentation disappointing. How can any be expected to discuss this seriously with such a scattered OP?

Hollow earth, and the idea of “aliens” being terrestrial make more sense than some of the more prevalent ideas out there.

a reply to: OOOOOO

So few have the skill to see what they are reading. From the outset, "voice to text" from someone for whom "English" is not their first language. Skip the delivery and focus on the data, peeps ;-)

Also, all of us took it seriously enough to respond. Let's keep this one rolling!

I’m sure you can explain exactly how gravity works, since it’s fully known and agreed upon.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: combatmaster

Yeh silly YouTube videos, hours long, that you refuse to summarise, probably because you have not even bothered to watch yourself, featuring religious rabbi, touting gibberish and mysticism, as opposed to actual science and facts, and laced with agenda, don't constitute evidence or anything reminiscent of such.

If our Earth is hollow then you will be able to explain why gravity is not a hell of a lot weaker on the surface where we reside for a start.

A fact that i notice you fail to even address.

Let's just start with that conundrum, shall we?

Now where opportunity is concerned well you have been given plenty of those to provide tangible evidence to support your claim and seem to come up short of providing any sort of meaningful answer every time.

As to begging, is that you back in fantasy land again?

originally posted by: BeNotAfraid

originally posted by: ITSALIVE
I find the ideas here interesting, but the presentation disappointing. How can any be expected to discuss this seriously with such a scattered OP?

Hollow earth, and the idea of “aliens” being terrestrial make more sense than some of the more prevalent ideas out there.

a reply to: OOOOOO

So few have the skill to see what they are reading. From the outset, "voice to text" from someone for whom "English" is not their first language. Skip the delivery and focus on the data, peeps ;-)

Also, all of us took it seriously enough to respond. Let's keep this one rolling!

you seem to be a victim of this yourself. I’m not commenting on poor grammar, but you lack the skills to see this. Could you point out the “data” presented in the OP? You see it right so that should be easy.

a reply to: OOOOOO
( I hope this translates well. I'm just some guy, and I speak in a kind of English Slang.)
To me, it seems like you are concerned about Nibiru showing up again, and the chaos that other people will go through... again. And again. And again.

It's this idea of cyclical things that I don't worry about personally. Outwardly, yes, I love people who love people. Absolutely. Some have resigned to their skill set and don't seek another talent. One can only do so much for others, even if it is just online forum conversations of this caliber. Choices.

There is no such thing as the "End of the World", there is change. I like the Christian New Earth vision. It's shiny!
Also, I love you.


Edit: Is this one of the starting points you mentioned? web.ornl.gov...

a reply to: ITSALIVE

Laughed out loud in real life Outernet. Likes it. Oinks in Bible.

Ahh, I needed that. Heh heh.

a reply to: ITSALIVE

I’m sure you can explain exactly how gravity works, since it’s fully known and agreed upon.

Not particularly, but i can tell you what it does, and why it would be less than it currently is here on the surface of the planet if indeed the Earth were hollow.

Gravity is a fundamental force of nature responsible for the attraction between objects with mass or energy.

Granted the mechanism behind such is not fully understood, but physics and mathematics can show us how gravity behaves and can make predictions about its effects.

You see the strength of the gravitational force depends on the mass of an object, and the distance between the object, and the center of the planet.

If the Earth were hollow, with the same mass distributed over a larger volume, the distance between an object on the surface and the center of the planet would be greater.

Which would equate to a decrease in the gravitational force exerted by an object on the surface aka a decrease in surface gravity.

a reply to: combatmaster

You might if the likes of Linda Moulton Howe or some other mad crank tells you so.

But the rest if us here in reality will just need to deal with the fact that our Earth is not hollow not anything reminiscent of such.

It is hardly the end of the world you see.

Anyhoo i have some gardening to be getting on with.

So ile bid you all farewell for a spell, need to get my own "earth" turned over, or nothing will be getting planted.

a reply to: andy06shake

Yes... all mad cranks...nutters! Go to the garden, get some sun! Should do you some good!

a reply to: combatmaster

Yes... all mad cranks...nutters!

Don't make them bad people, just somewhat misguided, because they "want to believe".

Go to the garden, get some sun!

Sun's nice, not bad day, hence the gardening escapade.

Should do you some good!

I'm not quite sure my back agrees, but aye it had to be done, else there wont be any tomatoes, peas, and carrots.