a reply to:
DontTreadOnMe
There's an issue with vaccines specifically, potentially more than one thing beyond whatever damage the spike protein itself may present in the gut.
It's actually not just the gut even. Immune dysfunction is changing the microbial ecosystem of the entire body, which is why we're going to be seeing
more and more "outbreaks" of native endemic diseases and those that are rarely infectious. Fungal infections requiring professional treatment will
start to become more common as microbial balances are disrupted, check. Spikes in cases of "healthy" vaccinated individuals for diseases normally only
appearing in the immunocompromised, check. Already widespread communicable diseases will spike as latent infections become symptomatic, check. We have
data that shows all these things that correlate to vaccine rollout and many of them are on the list of known adverse events, but we are constantly
told that all these correlations are not causation. I bet we'll see increases in shigellosis and enteric norovirus in schools for 2023 assuming
they've all resumed normal classes. Staph and MRSA will probably spike as well. I'd watch the states with COVID mandates for school attendance.
Sexually transmitted diseases have already spiked because taking prophylactic HIV drugs instead of using protection has been normalized for the most
promiscuous demographics. That will really spin out of control as those are also highly vaccinated for COVID.
What's odd is that as soon as you know the vaccines impact robust immune response these results are virtually guaranteed, but few experts are doing
the math or exploring it. It's not a matter of if it is happening, but a matter of how much it is happening and how long it persists. It's clearly
above the detection threshold for some of the expected impacts.
Until somebody has pictures of a vaccine particle directly attacking a heart at the moment of death people will insist there is no proof of causation.
Unfortunately, if significant numbers of people have persistent vaccine induced immune dysfunction, it will accelerate the propagation of resistant
diseases too. They will be reservoirs of disease and will require more frequent antibiotic intervention.
One of the key lies they're using to prop up the vaccine narrative is that COVID is more dangerous. The problem is the mRNA, if you get a correctly
manufactured dose, is producing magnitudes more of the toxic spike than natural infection and it's far more widely distributed in the body than after
environmental exposure. It doesn't prevent you from getting a future infection, doesn't speed clearing of the virus significantly, and evidence
suggests it actually increases your risk of infection. This is evidence from peer reviewed studies, but COVID vaccine supporters are unwilling to
argue outside the confines of small data vacuums. That's on top of the dangerous organ cell targeting of the nanolipids and the errant plasmids
waiting to be reverse transcribed to cells, either human cells or whatever the nanolipids manage to infiltrate. Each of these gets dismissed as
insignificant in its little compartment, but these are all happening in an open world where human health has limitations on the cumulative toxic
response it can overcome.
I view a medical provider with a syringe of mRNA the exact same way I'd view a toddler with a loaded gun. Nobody that's done due diligence on the data
would still be recommending this toxin. No sane and healthy person given proper informed consent would take it. That's why they decided everything had
to be censored, the severity of COVID had to be vastly overstated, and they want to withhold as much data as they can for as long as they can. None of
it stands up to thorough analysis under objective standards from prior to 2019. The coordinated suppression of early treatment to facilitate billions
in EUA vaccine profits, the fraudulent misrepresentation trial data, the failure of the CDC/FDA to meet their obligations to police safety signals,
and the massive conflicts of interest vertically integrated into the global hierarchies of policy pushers, easily falls under RICO statutes if all the
information isn't hidden behind classification.
When I tell people that they have broken the core ethics of public health, science, and medicine, they seem to think I'm exaggerating or ignorant. I
was in this field before 2019 and I know how much they changed on the whims of a small group of financial beneficiaries, somehow violating decades of
established science and policy precedents with virtually no pushback. It will be decades before they can repair the damage done and some unlucky
people will experience the consequences of this assault until their unnecessary premature deaths.
I'm not wasting much time seriously discussing the vaccines publicly anymore. For the most part anybody that still needs to hear the truth has already
stopped engaging in any real debate, they are literally incapable of showing any elasticity in their beliefs. No matter the weight of evidence against
them or that these beliefs are based on calculated lies. COVID vaccine supporters have to adhere to beliefs that defy objective reality. All medical
ethics, public health policy, and scientific study, prior to 2019 is invalid if it contradicts the beliefs that have been dictated to them since COVID
started. Even if it was lies, it still supports their beliefs and cannot be acknowledged as such.
It's really crazy. I have lost respect for many people I previously considered rational thinkers. People that even if we didn't share beliefs I felt
we existed on the same intellectual playground, but now I can't take anything they say seriously. I didn't even start out believing that the vaccines
would be as bad as they are. I'm shocked at the scale of adverse events they are still allowing to continue without even recalls of the worst lots or
increased monitoring of production. Until they get serious we can't even determine what is going wrong and until they do no mRNA drug can be
considered safe.
Anybody being told they must vaccinate should educate themselves sufficiently that the informed consent process with any medical provider will result
in either an exemption or a potential lawsuit. If they're curious and ethical you may just manage to convince them to dig up some data and uphold
their oath to do no harm.