1 in 36 Children now have Autism

a reply to: Xtrozeroru

Yeah yeah whatever. Sure there is a difference between moms and dads rule. But I can guarantee you that if you had this kid instead of me you would never be able to control him like you think you could. Dude, I raised kids before back in the '80s and I know how to be a dad. They are all grown and have families of their own. They also appreciate that I was the kind of dad that you're talking about. But this kid that I brought up here, he's different. You can do whatever you want to him or say whatever and it makes no difference. It's part of his autism. He's wired that way. The harder you push the harder he pushes back, in everything. And psychology doesn't work either, he's smart and he knows when somebody is trying to work on him that way. He's just different, he was made that way. He only thinks about how things affect him, how things will be for him. You just have no idea about this. Don't mean to derail the thread but I had to respond to that.

originally posted by: DontTreadOnMe
a reply to: JAGStorm

I read a study years ago that said that using peanut oil as an adjuvant for infant vaccines can cause peanut allergies in the undeveloped systems of infants.

Peanut oil is one of the foods that I am very sensitive to (not in an autism way, but a GI way)
Guess what is cooked in peanut oil, Chick-fil-A! I can eat exactly 1/2 of a chicken sandwich and not get sick.
I don’t eat them much, but it’s one of the only fast food places I enjoy.

originally posted by: wtbengineer
He's just different, he was made that way. He only thinks about how things affect him, how things will be for him. You just have no idea about this. Don't mean to derail the thread but I had to respond to that.

I know

I swear its humans evolving.

originally posted by: wtbengineer
a reply to: Xtrozeroru

Yeah yeah whatever. Sure there is a difference between moms and dads rule. But I can guarantee you that if you had this kid instead of me you would never be able to control him like you think you could. Dude, I raised kids before back in the '80s and I know how to be a dad. They are all grown and have families of their own. They also appreciate that I was the kind of dad that you're talking about. But this kid that I brought up here, he's different. You can do whatever you want to him or say whatever and it makes no difference. It's part of his autism. He's wired that way. The harder you push the harder he pushes back, in everything. And psychology doesn't work either, he's smart and he knows when somebody is trying to work on him that way. He's just different, he was made that way. He only thinks about how things affect him, how things will be for him. You just have no idea about this. Don't mean to derail the thread but I had to respond to that.

Well then there is the other part that has always put teeth to my words in my kids know I would not ruin my and their mother's life to safe them in a situation where they do not want to be saved. Been there, tried that with a sister time and time again and it doesn't work, and I just end up footing the bill.

Like comparing Apples and Oranges.

Legitimate Autism is just different.

a reply to: Annee


I swear , it`s not humans evolving .

originally posted by: Kenzo
a reply to: Annee


I swear , it`s not humans evolving .

Tell me that after you raise one of these kids.

a reply to: Annee

Is that kid going to reproduce?

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Annee

Is that kid going to reproduce?

Huh?

Why wouldn't he?

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Annee

Is that kid going to reproduce?

Huh?

Why wouldn't he?

You said they were non binary.

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Annee

Is that kid going to reproduce?

Huh?

Why wouldn't he?

You said they were non binary.

What do you think non-binary means?

a reply to: Annee

It means the likelyhood of reproducing is reduced.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Annee

It means the likelyhood of reproducing is reduced.

No it doesn't.

It simply means not defined by gender.

"Love the one you're with"

a reply to: Annee

Right, and a 50/50 shot at best to find a mating partner.

Thus, reduced likelyhood for reproducing.

Thats not evolution.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Annee

Right, and a 50/50 shot at best to find a mating partner.

Thus, reduced likelyhood for reproducing.

Thats not evolution.

If that's where you choose to put your head space.

Not worth my time.

a reply to: Annee

Yes, in math.

And debunking absurd notions.

a reply to: Annee

That's impossible, every living mammal can be defined by gender. Well until we changed the word to mean some fantasy BS at least.

a reply to: JAGStorm

To be fair, the spectrum is so wide that even if a kid has a lot of energy and is simply just being a kid it's now considered autism.

originally posted by: jidnum
a reply to: JAGStorm

To be fair, the spectrum is so wide that even if a kid has a lot of energy and is simply just being a kid it's now considered autism.

Oh this is multifaceted for sure.

More people are tested.
More people have it.
What was considered normal is now considered on the spectrum.