Mental sexual exploitation hits Britian for the protection of children

For me, Brithish English, I can't understand too much. This video is about the darkside of negative leadership protecting the youth of innocence against the perverse world of mental sickness.

Judging by the looks of the videos snap, I already want to loose my supper. I'll pass on just saying I literally cannot stand wokeness nor should any sane person.

originally posted by: Ilikesecrets
Judging by the looks of the videos snap, I already want to loose my supper. I'll pass on just saying I literally cannot stand wokeness nor should any sane person.

I feel for you , sorry I posted it about your dinner time. Is it really true due to all the lead from the gasoline in the air is finally coming down to pollute the minds of humankind?

sorrry I'm very serious bought this.
I moved to southern california in the 70''s and it just seems like everyone was high/fkup on the good life of freedom.

The supply of laundry in this institution
must be inexhaustible.

# 1691

The question is...

"Why would a person in drag want to meet, read to, dance with (etc) children"?

originally posted by: paraphi
The question is...

"Why would a person in drag want to meet, read to, dance with (etc) children"?

If they can indoctrinate kids it would give them a personally validation that they are not alone in their fetish desires, and hope to normalize their sexual needs if they can convince the kids that what they do is normal.

One of my earliest memories as a little boy - from the early 1970s - is seeing men in drag.

It's called pantomine and it's a very old British tradition.

Most TV comedians in the 70s and 80s would dress in drag for various sketches too. For that matter, some still do (Mrs Browns Boys, for example).

a reply to: AndyMayhew

Did they dress like the bloke in the image in the opening post?

Were they dressed sexually provocative?

Or were they dressed like Les Dawson dressed?

originally posted by: AndyMayhew
One of my earliest memories as a little boy - from the early 1970s - is seeing men in drag.

It's called pantomine and it's a very old British tradition.

Most TV comedians in the 70s and 80s would dress in drag for various sketches too. For that matter, some still do (Mrs Browns Boys, for example).

Back in the 70s or at any regular pantomime-were the drag artists dressed in bondage gear and did they sexually gyrate in the faces of toddlers?
Of course they didn't.Pantomime drag was an old man with a dress,a wig and some make up.

Todays drag for kids is slightly different would you not agree?

This is not the same thing as "Mrs Browns boys."

a reply to: AndyMayhew

Pantomime and drag sex shows are incomparable. Major difference being once the show was over a pantomime queen would revert back to being a normal human being and recognised their biological sex. These new trans folk live a life of sexual perversion 24/7 and far from being an act, they actually want the rest of the world to disregard logic and accept their sick and twisted fetish for children. There’s a big difference between pretending to be a woman for comedy purposes and believing you can actually become a woman to satisfy your sexual perversion.

If you have a dick, you’re a man and no amount of BS will ever change that.

Pull out your wanger in front of my kids and I don’t care if you’re wearing a dress, caked in makeup and have fake tits, you’re waking up in an ambulance.

originally posted by: AndyMayhew
It's called pantomine and it's a very old British tradition.

There's a difference between pantomime, which is comedic and traditional, and sexualised drag artists that often degrade women.

I will go ahead and say it as it needs to be said.

perverse world of mental sickness.

It is not mental sickness.
It is demonic.

originally posted by: Quadrivium
I will go ahead and say it as it needs to be said.

perverse world of mental sickness.

It is not mental sickness.
It is demonic.

Interesting, I'm in aggreeance and I wouldn't even consider myself religious. Seems like some want a modern day Sodom and Gomorrah to exist. Many read how that turned out.

I just saw a very pertinent picture showing the hypocrisy. A woman painting stripes on a cow with the caption "painting stripes on a cow does no make it a zebra". Drag artists dress flamboyantly not to become a woman, not because they like wearing womens clothes, it's because the get a sexual kick out of it and they want "recognition" so their sexual kicks can be legitimised. End of.

a reply to: AndyMayhew

Fast forward to modern Canada…



nypost.com...


A shop teacher?

Yep meanwhile we are screamed at that nothing is wrong and is all for the good of gender crap and the woke idiots, the bizarre the degenerate and the pedos are the normal and is all good and safe for all.

originally posted by: StratosFear

originally posted by: Quadrivium
I will go ahead and say it as it needs to be said.

perverse world of mental sickness.

It is not mental sickness.
It is demonic.

Interesting, I'm in aggreeance and I wouldn't even consider myself religious. Seems like some want a modern day Sodom and Gomorrah to exist. Many read how that turned out.

There is evil in this world.
Some people believe evil is just a human perception, nothing more.
Regardless, there is evil.
We (humans) are capable of the greatest good OR the greatest evils.
If we can all agree evil exist, then surely, the opposite exist.
From whence do these two opposites come?
Where do those thoughts come from:
"It's just a little thing, no one will ever know"
"Go ahead, put yourself first, screw the other's you deserve it"
"It's not of much value, no one will ever miss it"
On and on.
They have a source.
The opposite is true as well.
There is evil in this world, there is also Good.

This is evil.
It is an attack on the most innocent among us.
And we are allowing it because of political correctness, which is evil as well.

a reply to: Silcone Synapse

agreed. I'd rather be approached by a Monty Python pepperpot than...whatever was shown in OP's video



Eric and Michael could totally work it, rowf!

a reply to: marg6043

as a trans person who just wants to live as the gender opposite to what I was born with, you have no idea how bad things are.

a reply to: musicismagic

Abraham Lincoln once asked a crowd how many legs a dog had if you called it's tail a leg.

Some in the crowd said "Five".

Abraham Lincoln replied, "How many legs does a dog have if you call his tail a leg? Four. Saying that a tail is a leg doesn't make it a leg."