It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Tucker Carlson releases the first wave of videos from Jan 6th

page: 19
44
<< 16  17  18    20  21  22 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 8 2023 @ 08:07 AM
link   
Donnie jr. is mad tucker is the only pundit at Fox pushing the tapes. 😂😂😂😂


Wonder if he’s mad about Tucker’s newly released text saying he passionately hates his daddy.

God, it’s all so pathetic.



posted on Mar, 8 2023 @ 08:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: frogs453

originally posted by: Nevercompromise
Why is it we are just now seeing all this for the first time?
Original narrative is not the truth is why.



originally posted by: frogs453

originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: frogs453

We need the full story. Good or bad. Why are the Democrats having a hissy fit over this being released ? What's in there they don't want seen ?


It's not about what is seen. We know this, we've seen this. Why did Tucker show only this with Chansley? Why not him going through the broken door? Why show Sicknick walking? We know he was chemical sprayed by a Patriot and died the next day. Why give this to Tucker who is well documented in court to not being truthful?



Again, what do you mean seeing this for the first time? How did you miss previous video of people illegally in the building,wandering around, stealing the podium, some smoking, some screaming they were coming for certain politicians, some with feet on desks, some in the chambers, climbing around with handfuls of flexi cuffs, some of what appear to be Patriot sympathizing cops taking photos with them?

Some of this footage like Chansley and others shown during the Jan 6 committee.

How is this the first time? And how does this negate illegally entering the building,interrupting an official proceeding (what Chansley was charged with) and all of the other violence that actually was occuring in other areas?


& the Fed's ! Don't forget to ask him if 1st time seeing all the Feds !!!!



posted on Mar, 8 2023 @ 08:17 AM
link   
U.S. Capitol Police leader, Yogananda Pittman, consistently ignored calls from officers for increased protection and back up of the Capitol building on J6.

Two days later, on January 8th., Pelosi promoted her to the position of interim chief of the U.S. Capitol Police.

@3:46--rumble.com...

After Pitman retired at the end of 2022...she moved to Nancy Pelosi's district, after being awarded the prestigious job as Chief of the UC Berkeley Police Dept.

news.berkeley.edu...



posted on Mar, 8 2023 @ 08:17 AM
link   
a reply to: tanstaafl

So you don't have actual evidence or even links and we are to rely on your mere anecdotes as proof?


You make the claims the onus is on you to provide evidence to support what you said.

That's not how it works here at ATS as you are well aware given the time you have been here.

Next. LoL
edit on 8-3-2023 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 8 2023 @ 08:24 AM
link   
a reply to: tanstaafl



Said the guy who has no clue what an insurrection looks like.


Aside from witnessing it happen on the 6th of January 2021 you mean, live on TV for all to see.



Depends on what you mean by 'unacceptable'.


If you don't realise what went down is completely unacceptable in a nation that is supposed to be the pinnacle of democracy, then you are part of the problem as opposed to the solution, not that we did not know that already.



Do you mean that whoever engaged in it deserves the death penalty?


Your words, not mine.



Or punishment in accordance with and relative to their actual 'crimes'? 'What-about-ism' those who engaged in the mostly violent riots of the summer of 2020?


Punishment is up to the judge to decide according to sentencing guidelines.



You are, as usual, totally ignoring the fact that I - and everyone else I've seen trying to talk sense to numb-nuts - have always accepted and am/are fully aware that there was some violence and vandalism that was engaged in by a relatively (to the size of the crowd that was actually there) small group of people, and I/we have always maintained and agreed that that was unacceptable. In fact, we were pissed that these people allowed themselves to be tricked into acting out by the Capital Police/Antifa/FBI plants like Unknown-masked-guy-breaking-the-window/John Sullivan/Ray Epps that were there engaging in the violence themselves, or just egging them on.


Yada yada yada and not one bit of tangible evidence to show regarding FBI plants or their involvement just because Tusker told you so.

The fact is what happened is well documented.

And the fact is your courts have spoken by way of the jail sentences handed down to the scum that choose to act like muppets.

Never mind the additional fact that your election fraud nonsense has been thrown out of court to the tune of around 70 different occasions.

Imagine that.


en.wikipedia.org...
www.britannica.com...
edition.cnn.com...
edit on 8-3-2023 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 8 2023 @ 08:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: IAMTAT

Ah, but from your link. It's mere seconds that they may not have and her attorney could not state why it would even matter as all the relevant camera angles and video of her crimes without just a few seconds was already provided.



LOL...the prosecutors are saying to the defendant "Pay no attention to all these other videos...TRUST US, we have already selected all the video evidence you need to see; We have your best interests at heart."
edit on 0AMMarCSTAMCST by IAMTAT because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 8 2023 @ 08:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: tanstaafl

Once again, it was a big enough issue that a database was created for defendants to use to look throughout the government's evidence against them.

Once again, without full disclosure - to everyone, publicly - I don't trust that they disclosed everything, and neither should anyone else. Their track record of hiding, obfuscating and lying is self-evident.



posted on Mar, 8 2023 @ 08:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: tanstaafl

"Judge denies Jan. 6 defendant’s bid for time to review McCarthy’s Capitol security footage"

"A federal judge on Friday denied a Jan. 6 defendant’s request to delay her imminent trial in order to review thousands of hours of security footage recently made available by Speaker Kevin McCarthy."

www.politico.com...

Among man other things...




posted on Mar, 8 2023 @ 08:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: tanstaafl

So you don't have actual evidence or even links and we are to rely on your mere anecdotes as evidence?

Like I said, it was long ago.

Yes, I know how it works, but I imagine I'm not the only one here that remembers this evidence. It was earth shattering, but like all evidence of their crimes, was quickly covered up, conveniently allowing gullible useful idiots to dismiss reality out of hand when exposed to it - kind of like someone is doing right now.

By all means, carry on, I'm getting bored with this thread.



posted on Mar, 8 2023 @ 08:36 AM
link   
a reply to: fringeofthefringe

No bother fringeofthefringe.

At least you can get a conversation out of you without the hated and cheekiness in tow.

I respect that.


I've got my big cup a Java.

Convince me what i witnessed take place on January 6th 2021, was a hoax, and that it was all a setup?
edit on 8-3-2023 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 8 2023 @ 08:37 AM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

Ummm... the defendents attorney did not have any reason to state why mere seconds of video of his client would matter when they have already seen video from multiple angles of her committing the crime. So two or 20 seconds of her drinking water, or adjusting her hat, or speaking to someone will negate the crime she already committed or was about to commit? How's that work? What can occur after or before the crime that makes it not a crime? But they want to peruse 41,000 hours of video? And then have ats screech that she's not getting a speedy trial?
edit on 8-3-2023 by frogs453 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 8 2023 @ 08:39 AM
link   
a reply to: tanstaafl

Like i said, your anecdotes don't count as evidence, which you do not have, and/or have chosen not to provide.

If you know how it works then you understand other people are not here to do your homework.

Best to put up or shut up, because by the looks of it.

And where you blaming the FBI for 1993 trade center bombing is concerned, you got squat.



posted on Mar, 8 2023 @ 08:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: tanstaafl

Aside from witnessing it happen on the 6th of January 2021 you mean, live on TV for all to see.

Said the guy who has no clue what an insurrection looks like.

I watched it too. I saw a mostly peaceful protest, along with some very specific agitators and maga lemmings engaging in some violence and vandalism.


If you don't realise what went down is completely unacceptable in a nation that is supposed to be the pinnacle of democracy, then you are part of the problem as opposed to the solution, not that we did not know that already.

If you don't realize that our founding fathers abhorred democracies like the tyrannical governments that they were, then you are incapable of rationally discussing anything with respect to our Constitutional Republic.

One of it's foundational freedoms is the freedom to peacefully and patriotically make our voices heard, as President Trump suggested we do.

The fact that some law enforcement plants (both Capital Police and FBI) and Antifa actors infiltrated and engaged in acts of violence and vandalism is inarguable, and every single one of them should be punished and prosecuted - starting with Ray Epps and John Sullivan, but working the way up to those who arranged for them to be there and arranged for the lack of police presence to prevent things from escalating in the first place, including Pelosi and Schumer/McConnell.


Your words, not mine.

My words, but it seems to be what you are implying, and since you refuse to answer the question and be specific... ?

Ok, so, I'm bored, and won't respond to any more of your or others nonsense unless something motivates me, so, by all means, get your silly last words in, claim victory, and be a legend in your own minds.



posted on Mar, 8 2023 @ 08:48 AM
link   
a reply to: tanstaafl

Only thing I'm implying is what happened.

As to peaceful protests, what a load of tripe.

They don't put peaceful protesters in jail for years tanstaafl.

And attacking government buildings and building gallows hardly amounts to peaceful anything.

Again you don't have one iota of real proof regarding the claims you made about the FBI, so that's you and Tucker.

As to your failure to respond, no wonder considering the lack of evidence to support your fantastical nonsensical blatant lies.

Night night sleep tight dinna let the FBI bite.
edit on 8-3-2023 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 8 2023 @ 08:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: frogs453

Context eh.

I don't think it matters much to the likes of Tucker, as long as it fits his agenda and hate-filled speal.


**sigh**

If only you big pissers would input such emotion,certainty & distrust to the sitting administration of the time-aka- THE GOVERNMENT regardless of supposed party & leave all the handbag swinging to the teen girls arguing about who is the " dreamiest " boy band member.
I'm embarresed for all of you insisting 'your 80 year old, mega rich team captain,neither of whom care 2 farts in a tent about any of you, is beter than the other sides !

Get played much ????



posted on Mar, 8 2023 @ 08:50 AM
link   
a reply to: tanstaafl




I saw a mostly peaceful protest


Sure you did.




posted on Mar, 8 2023 @ 08:53 AM
link   
a reply to: tanstaafl

Well. Sure would like to see video of the Capitol cops engaged in the violence and destruction. Seems like Tucker would have shown that instead of a cop wandering around. You have a link?

Epps never stepped foot in the building.

Sullivan? Here's his charges:


Obstruction of an Official Proceeding; Civil Disorder; Entering and Remaining in a Restricted Building or Grounds; Disorderly and Disruptive Conduct in a Restricted Building or Grounds; Disorderly Conduct in a Capitol Building; Parading, Demonstrating, o rPicketing in a Capitol Building; Aiding and Abetting


DOJ Breach Cases-Sullivan



posted on Mar, 8 2023 @ 08:54 AM
link   
a reply to: fotsyfots

Calm down no need to scream in block capitals.


I'm embarrassed you think im a Biden fan or even a democrat.

I'm not even an American fotsyfots, but i do get to have an opinion, just like yourself.

As to being played much, i think that may be what Trump does to his maga crew.

And like fiddle no less.



posted on Mar, 8 2023 @ 08:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

So, it was mostly peaceful and far less firey than the Portland/Kenosha insurrections?
Thanks for the clarification.




edit on 3 8 2023 by underpass61 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 8 2023 @ 08:55 AM
link   
You can only cry wolf so many times, Tucker. Finally more Republicans have found their courage and are speaking out against the cherry picking regarding the tapes.

All he has managed to do is bring the January 6 insurrection attempt back into the spotlight. That, and seeing if he can make fools of Fox viewers, again.

It’s actually comical how badly it’s failing. And, all you here trying to tell us we didn’t see what we saw on January 6 - pathetic.

You guys have outkicked your coverage. Keep going though!




top topics



 
44
<< 16  17  18    20  21  22 >>

log in

join