It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: frogs453
originally posted by: Nevercompromise
Why is it we are just now seeing all this for the first time?
Original narrative is not the truth is why.
originally posted by: frogs453
originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: frogs453
We need the full story. Good or bad. Why are the Democrats having a hissy fit over this being released ? What's in there they don't want seen ?
It's not about what is seen. We know this, we've seen this. Why did Tucker show only this with Chansley? Why not him going through the broken door? Why show Sicknick walking? We know he was chemical sprayed by a Patriot and died the next day. Why give this to Tucker who is well documented in court to not being truthful?
Again, what do you mean seeing this for the first time? How did you miss previous video of people illegally in the building,wandering around, stealing the podium, some smoking, some screaming they were coming for certain politicians, some with feet on desks, some in the chambers, climbing around with handfuls of flexi cuffs, some of what appear to be Patriot sympathizing cops taking photos with them?
Some of this footage like Chansley and others shown during the Jan 6 committee.
How is this the first time? And how does this negate illegally entering the building,interrupting an official proceeding (what Chansley was charged with) and all of the other violence that actually was occuring in other areas?
Said the guy who has no clue what an insurrection looks like.
Depends on what you mean by 'unacceptable'.
Do you mean that whoever engaged in it deserves the death penalty?
Or punishment in accordance with and relative to their actual 'crimes'? 'What-about-ism' those who engaged in the mostly violent riots of the summer of 2020?
You are, as usual, totally ignoring the fact that I - and everyone else I've seen trying to talk sense to numb-nuts - have always accepted and am/are fully aware that there was some violence and vandalism that was engaged in by a relatively (to the size of the crowd that was actually there) small group of people, and I/we have always maintained and agreed that that was unacceptable. In fact, we were pissed that these people allowed themselves to be tricked into acting out by the Capital Police/Antifa/FBI plants like Unknown-masked-guy-breaking-the-window/John Sullivan/Ray Epps that were there engaging in the violence themselves, or just egging them on.
originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: IAMTAT
Ah, but from your link. It's mere seconds that they may not have and her attorney could not state why it would even matter as all the relevant camera angles and video of her crimes without just a few seconds was already provided.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: tanstaafl
Once again, it was a big enough issue that a database was created for defendants to use to look throughout the government's evidence against them.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: tanstaafl
"Judge denies Jan. 6 defendant’s bid for time to review McCarthy’s Capitol security footage"
"A federal judge on Friday denied a Jan. 6 defendant’s request to delay her imminent trial in order to review thousands of hours of security footage recently made available by Speaker Kevin McCarthy."
www.politico.com...
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: tanstaafl
So you don't have actual evidence or even links and we are to rely on your mere anecdotes as evidence?
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: tanstaafl
Aside from witnessing it happen on the 6th of January 2021 you mean, live on TV for all to see.
If you don't realise what went down is completely unacceptable in a nation that is supposed to be the pinnacle of democracy, then you are part of the problem as opposed to the solution, not that we did not know that already.
Your words, not mine.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: frogs453
Context eh.
I don't think it matters much to the likes of Tucker, as long as it fits his agenda and hate-filled speal.
Obstruction of an Official Proceeding; Civil Disorder; Entering and Remaining in a Restricted Building or Grounds; Disorderly and Disruptive Conduct in a Restricted Building or Grounds; Disorderly Conduct in a Capitol Building; Parading, Demonstrating, o rPicketing in a Capitol Building; Aiding and Abetting