It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
Is Bret Weinstein pro vax?
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
Is Bret Weinstein pro vax?
He has talked both sides, best to listen to him.
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
Bret Weinstein is against mandates, lockdowns, and against the mass vaccinations with the mRNA products. Just like any sane person would have been with untested, experimental, and potentially hazardous products that are known to cause harms and deaths.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
Bret Weinstein is against mandates, lockdowns, and against the mass vaccinations with the mRNA products. Just like any sane person would have been with untested, experimental, and potentially hazardous products that are known to cause harms and deaths.
Why are you talking to me about him, go tell that to the other guy asking...lol geez
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
Is Bret Weinstein pro vax?
He has talked both sides,
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
I think you foiled the plans of these meddling kids.
What? Only you are allowed to ask for the studies....
originally posted by: SentientBunnySuit
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
I think you foiled the plans of these meddling kids.
What? Only you are allowed to ask for the studies....
An interesting counterpoint is, where are the pharmaceutical industry defamation suits if these claims are false? Smartmatic and Dominion Voting Systems separately each launched successful defamation suits against Fox News and Rudy Giuliani over claims of involvement in election fraud. It would seem that if mRNA technology was being defamed, pharma attorneys would be tripping over themselves to similarly defend their products. Why the crickets? If there is nothing to hide, Big Pharma is doing themselves (and their now even wealthier shareholders) a tremendous disservice not seeking damages. Unless of course, there actually might be a very large number of some might say literal skeletons in the closet they would rather not see being dragged out in court.
originally posted by: flice
a reply to: v1rtu0s0
I have to commend you both for taking notice of that... It's that kind of awareness we need to have as citizens.
Not to side rail the thread, because it's important, but just to make a similar reference where you can witness the lack of reaction as an indication of something: The Nordstream terror bombing....
You can be 100% sure they would be all over the news if they had evidence that Russia did it, but they aren't.
Why is that? Because they can't defend it....
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
He doesn't appear to be promoting them....does he?