Mrna: this is horrible

a reply to: Xtrozero
Is Bret Weinstein pro vax?

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

Do you not like Ford Pintos? Are you anti car?

See you get it...

originally posted by: Itisnowagain

Is Bret Weinstein pro vax?

He has talked both sides, best to listen to him.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Itisnowagain

Is Bret Weinstein pro vax?

He has talked both sides, best to listen to him.

Bret Weinstein is against mandates, lockdowns, and against the mass vaccinations with the mRNA products. Just like any sane person would have been with untested, experimental, and potentially hazardous products that are known to cause harms and deaths.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

Bret Weinstein is against mandates, lockdowns, and against the mass vaccinations with the mRNA products. Just like any sane person would have been with untested, experimental, and potentially hazardous products that are known to cause harms and deaths.

Why are you talking to me about him, go tell that to the other guy asking...lol geez

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

Bret Weinstein is against mandates, lockdowns, and against the mass vaccinations with the mRNA products. Just like any sane person would have been with untested, experimental, and potentially hazardous products that are known to cause harms and deaths.

Why are you talking to me about him, go tell that to the other guy asking...lol geez

You said that he has talked both sides, and even though he isn't against vaccines, generally speaking, he is not a vaccine apologist and a defender of the pharmaceuticals. He has been very critical of the entire Covid campaign, the lockdowns, the mass vaccinations, AND of the mRNA products.

a reply to: Xtrozero
I have listened to him....I just watched him speaking to Freddie Sayers on the Unherd yt channel..'Bret Weinstein: I will be vindicated over Covid' interview.

He doesn't appear to be promoting them....does he?

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Itisnowagain

Is Bret Weinstein pro vax?

He has talked both sides,

Do you know which way he walked though?

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

Do you not like Ford Pintos? Are you anti car?

See you get it...

Do you?

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

I think you foiled the plans of these meddling kids.

What? Only you are allowed to ask for the studies....

An interesting counterpoint is, where are the pharmaceutical industry defamation suits if these claims are false? Smartmatic and Dominion Voting Systems separately each launched successful defamation suits against Fox News and Rudy Giuliani over claims of involvement in election fraud. It would seem that if mRNA technology was being defamed, pharma attorneys would be tripping over themselves to similarly defend their products. Why the crickets? If there is nothing to hide, Big Pharma is doing themselves (and their now even wealthier shareholders) a tremendous disservice not seeking damages. Unless of course, there actually might be a very large number of some might say literal skeletons in the closet they would rather not see being dragged out in court.

originally posted by: SentientBunnySuit

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

I think you foiled the plans of these meddling kids.

What? Only you are allowed to ask for the studies....

An interesting counterpoint is, where are the pharmaceutical industry defamation suits if these claims are false? Smartmatic and Dominion Voting Systems separately each launched successful defamation suits against Fox News and Rudy Giuliani over claims of involvement in election fraud. It would seem that if mRNA technology was being defamed, pharma attorneys would be tripping over themselves to similarly defend their products. Why the crickets? If there is nothing to hide, Big Pharma is doing themselves (and their now even wealthier shareholders) a tremendous disservice not seeking damages. Unless of course, there actually might be a very large number of some might say literal skeletons in the closet they would rather not see being dragged out in court.

Please create a thread that addresses this. The point should be made. Why isn't pharma suing everyone left and right?

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Because the government gave them indemnity.? They decided to gamble with the citizens' lives. Getting everybody to take a rushed experimental vaccine would have been a hard sell so they had to the infrastructure up and running before the rollout, so we might ask how long it takes to set up a PR infrastructure, Along with controlled media and role model actors to act as Judas goats? the more you look the more pre-planned it seems to get. Did they stop all other vaccines to get the Mrns out did they have to build factories? at one vaccine a second for the number of jabs in arms the math says it would require thirty-five years for about five billion doses. How good was the quality control on these numbers of products? Pushed by a puppy torturer and the son of a eugenicist. The whole thing smells of deniability, and we all know who uses that tactic.

It's unbelievable that people can't come to the realization that they were used as lab rats byb big pharma. The vast majority of these people are democrats who "hate" big pharma. They won't admit they got duped, and deny reality. The chickens will come home to roost.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

I have to commend you both for taking notice of that... It's that kind of awareness we need to have as citizens.

Not to side rail the thread, because it's important, but just to make a similar reference where you can witness the lack of reaction as an indication of something: The Nordstream terror bombing....

You can be 100% sure they would be all over the news if they had evidence that Russia did it, but they aren't.
Why is that? Because they can't defend it....

a reply to: zandra

Pzifers own data.. something like 25 women got preagnant. Over half had miscarriages and 4/5 had cognitive dysfunction. In Scotland still births are up. Miscarriages are also up..

originally posted by: flice
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

I have to commend you both for taking notice of that... It's that kind of awareness we need to have as citizens.

Not to side rail the thread, because it's important, but just to make a similar reference where you can witness the lack of reaction as an indication of something: The Nordstream terror bombing....

You can be 100% sure they would be all over the news if they had evidence that Russia did it, but they aren't.
Why is that? Because they can't defend it....

Exactly, it's basic logic like this that eludes people.

The guilty keep quiet.

Hey, pro-vaxers. Biden and Phizer just announced they have a miracle cure for COVID. It's called thalidomide, studies say it is 99.999% effective at reducing stupidity in genetic lines.
en.wikipedia.org...

originally posted by: Itisnowagain

He doesn't appear to be promoting them....does he?

I said he drives a level of neutrality who talks about events happening without hyperbole. If there is a study he says its a study that still needs lot of work, and not suggest it is 100% truism as others will grab a few points and build a new narrative around it to fit their agenda that tends to align with the extreme.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain

Do you know which way he walked though?

True science...

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

Do you?

You are getting old with your one liners, go bug someone else.