UFO Balloons Engineered Panic To Distract From Nord Stream Revelations

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: vNex92

So they manufactured the balloon thing before the train derailment?

Time Machine or planned event?

Or straight up... coincidence.

Probability is streaky, lumpy. Unfortunately humans like order and patterns meaning whats just a streaky lumpy patch of probability and happening appears as something significant or deliberate.

And theres one sub -set of humans who see patterns everywhere more than most, and thats Conspiracy Theorists, or at least the ones that ignore or refuse to acknowledge the lumpy, streaky nature of probability.

originally posted by: schuyler
Nobody is "panicking" over some balloons.
Nobody is "panicking" over a pipeline.

If you are "panicked" over these minor issues, go ahead and panic, but don't claim everyone else is. Maybe it's only you that is triggered here.

Claiming an act of war against a nuclear power is a minor issue is embracing ignorance.

originally posted by: xuenchen
What Edward Snowden is saying could actually be the distraction !!!! 🤣🤣

I have no idea WTF they're up to, but:

Right?

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: vNex92

So they manufactured the balloon thing before the train derailment?

Time Machine or planned event?

Just a bunch of opportunists.

Hunter’s laptop
Twitter
Biden’s files
The vaccine implosion

All before the invasion of the balloon armada.

If a train wreck should come along midway through their epic distraction op. why not?

a reply to: schuyler

Not to mention distraction is a weird conclusion.

Everyone I know is aware about Ohio. Most seem suspicious about the handling of it too, at least that’s what I gather. They’re able to read about that and the balloons.

As for the Nordstream allegation, it’s an anonymous source. I won’t discount the end claim, I wouldn’t put it past the US. But it’s telling that so many around here pass it off as the final answer when they’re the very ones ripping on western news day in and day out. I too am skeptical of a lot of news stories. But it’s different when you have someone involved on the record providing evidence and putting their name next to it and an anonymous source.

As for the implications of it, Russia has good intelligence gathering, or at least historically does. I don’t think they needed the news story for their conclusions.

Snowden was recently granted Russian citizenship. I wouldn't put it past him to act as a mouthpiece for the Russians or to say ANYTHING that was divisive with respect to the United States.

a reply to: Creep Thumper

That same Snowden that exposed the NSA and its spying on the American people.

I wouldn't put it past him to act as a mouthpiece for the Russians or to say ANYTHING that was divisive with respect to the United States.

By your logic Trump is also a Russian mouthpiece for the Russians.

a reply to: Creep Thumper

ANYTHING that was divisive with respect to the United States.

Snowden was divisive because he exposed the NSA spying agaisnt American people and even allies?


Snowden’s back: Spying scandal clouds EU-US ties ahead of Biden visit

Snowden is in it for himself now.

I think this is a convenient distraction from EVERYTHING.

NordStream is a huge one.
The war in Ukraine is another.
Epstine list supposedly being released.
Mushrooms clouds over Ohio.
Gas slowly going back up.
Food supply disruptions.
What else?

I feel like we've entered a new phase here. We are being overwhelmed with misinformed, disinformed, and propaganda constantly 24/7 . It's highly likely we are about to see a massive false flag.

Snowden is someone who knows how the establishment thinks. I wouldn't discount his observations. Of course he's in it for himself the American government tried to throw him in a box for the rest of his life for exposing their crimes of mass surveillance against private citizens.

Ironic really he now is a Russian citizen...

originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: vNex92

UFO Balloons Engineered Panic To Distract From Nord Stream Revelations

I would calculate about 5% of the population would have had an interest in Nordstream.

Hardly a distraction.

How were the calculations performed ?
What was the size of the test group ?
Is this by country ? by region ? , etc .
When did the poll occur ?
Was this an unbiased poll ?

This is my theory too.

a reply to: MetalThunder

That kind of post is not productive. It suggest any incidents are pre-suggested, which is absurd. Waving your string around is insulting to the community.

They keep messing around and it's gonna go hot. Whether they want it too or not.