It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Ryder said American pilots who flew alongside the latest object before it was downed determined that no human was aboard. He added it was incapable of maneuvering and did not resemble an airplane. Ryder and other officials would not say whether it could simply be a weather balloon or another type of balloon. "It wasn't an aircraft per se," Ryder told a news briefing.
originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
Source : U.S. shoots down car-sized unidentified object flying above Alaska
Ryder said American pilots who flew alongside the latest object before it was downed determined that no human was aboard. He added it was incapable of maneuvering and did not resemble an airplane. Ryder and other officials would not say whether it could simply be a weather balloon or another type of balloon. "It wasn't an aircraft per se," Ryder told a news briefing.
Here’s the rub…….what happened to naming unidentified objects UAP’s ???
This has all the hallmarks of an unidentified flying object.
The government made a new designation and system for these types of events…….they padded themselves on their backs.
So then they shoot down an object the size of a car, that they can’t identify and won’t call a UAP.
What a bunch of elephant excrement! (Orbs 😉)
👽
originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
It had been tracked…..for longer hours than the reported size could possibly hold fuel for long hours….imo.
It was at 40k feet and not falling to earth on its own…such as space junk might do if it didn’t burn up on re-entry first.
Suspicious, I’ll say also
👽
originally posted by: ka47
a reply to: Ophiuchus1
it's been reported that whatever this thing was, it did not have the ability to manuever on its own. space junk from a busted satellite??
originally posted by: daboxfan
no witnesses..... remote area. unprovable.... Your govt is feeding you this. you so the math. Biden had to "get tough"
a reply to: Ophiuchus1