Sailor Jessica Watson breaks silence following sudden death of partner

a reply to: MaxxAction

Here's where it gets even weirder.

It is pretty easy to explain why the doctors had not heard of Surgisphere, the company that allegedly provided the data for the seemingly fabricated study.

Up until March of 2020, Surgisphere was seemingly a NOBODY. I checked their twitter feed, and they had almost zero activity up until March of this year, when they got a predictive model for the treatment of Covid-19 approved, since which time it has been instituted for use in over 1000 hospitals. Things that make you go hmmmm.

I made some screen captures of their twitter feed, which was kind of a ghost town for a long time. There were several posts in 2011, a few in 2012, two posts in 2013, one in 2014, two in 2016, two in 2017, then nothing till March of 2020, when their twitter feed blew up as they brought their cash cow predictive treatment model online, now being referenced by over 1k hospitals, just in time to "save us" and provide good data for treatment of Covid -19. Data which just happens to start out claiming HCQ is dangerous and causes higher mortality in Covid-19 patients.

Perhaps stranger still, when you search when Surgisphere was founded, you get some very conflicting information in the same screen shot. Google says 1998, their Linkedin intro says 2007.

The hell of it is, NOTHING happened to the people who perpetrated this fraud, besides getting really rich for doing the bidding of the Pharma overlords. Did anyone go back and correct their assertions about HCQ? Not on your life. Not a word from the WHO, CDC, NIH, or any other health governing body that is supposed to watch out for people, not a word.

In a general sense, if the papers, articles, or whatever else is out there say something is good or positive having to do with vaccines, protocols, treatment models, or specialty drugs, it's probably a Goddamned lie.

a reply to: ChaoticOrder

Didn't the government recently but quietly admit that 5G technology's frequencies actually do cause a lot of these health problems we are witnessing?

So perhaps they are using the Vax/Covid rhetoric to divert attention?

There's far more casualties due to the world war of thought than there is in Ukraine. And we are all biting their bait; hook. line. and stinker (no wonder we buy up all the toilet paper first during an emergency, whole lotta stink going on)

*Making the atrocities we are witnessing today covert war crimes.

originally posted by: frogs453
That's the problem with fear mongering. Just jumping to one conclusion without considering all of the possibilities. Why is the thread not considering all of the possibilities?

Was he even vaccinated, did he actually get COVID yet and if so, how long was he sick? It is not even a good debate to have with many here that instantly blame the vaccine for everything now while suggesting the actual virus is nothing at all.

double#

a reply to: ChaoticOrder

Give the poor frog a break, all he truly thinks about is stagnant water, mud, lily pads, and screaming at the moon. Oh and, delicious flies.

Her boyfriend?

originally posted by: frogs453

originally posted by: putnam6

originally posted by: frogs453
I do know of a beautiful 28 year old mom of two who died on her front lawn while walking to her car of a stroke, and my uncle had his first stroke at 30. However, this was well before 2020. Both appeared very fit and healthy at the time. It does occur.

FWIW it can be both, yes young people have died before, but the question is how many are dying? there are a few reputable people saying we are now getting excess deaths above the normal "young people dying"

Possibly. However, why does everyone jump to vaccines, when it was discovered before the vaccinations were available that even an asymptomatic case of covid can cause heart attacks and stokes months after the covid case? So, the thing is, much more information is needed before you can assume it's the vaccination. That's the problem with fear mongering. Just jumping to one conclusion without considering all of the possibilities. Why is the thread not considering all of the possibilities?

Where did you get the idea that infection that results in no symptoms can layer cause heart attacks?? Is SARS-CoV-2 somehow a magical virus and we haven't realised?! Once the virus has become biochemically inactive the show for the virus has finished.

I didn't know that having no symptoms i.e no disease can cause heart attacks and strokes later on because of a virus that caused nothing during primary infection.

Do you have any links for what you claimed? I.e the magical properties you have assigned to the virus...

The irony about fear mongering when you assign some properties to the virus that don't exist.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: MaxxAction

Here is some information.
Link

Link

Link

And more. Link

There are many more if you wish.

You seem to misunderstand Covid-19 and infection with SARS-CoV-2.

When you get infected with SARS-CoV-2 and you are asymptomatic you don't develop Covid-19 which the disease that could be caused by the virus.

All your links are discussing the increase in the risk of heart related conditions following Covid-19 disease. Nowhere it says that asymptomatic individuals can develop heart related conditions.

In addition research of quite large groups has shown no increase in cases of myocarditis and pericarditis following infection.

Post COVID-19 infection was not associated with either myocarditis (aHR 1.08; 95% CI 0.45 to 2.56) or pericarditis (aHR 0.53; 95% CI 0.25 to 1.13). We did not observe an increased incidence of neither pericarditis nor myocarditis in adult patients recovering from COVID-19 infection

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

a reply to: MaxxAction

And this is a bombshell publication

www.ahajournals.org...

The study shows that the immunological response elicited by the mRNA vaccine was very similar in those who developed post-vaccination myocarditis and others. In other words, myocarditis could not be associated with abnormal autoantibodies, viral infections other than SARS-CoV-2, or excessive production of antibodies elicited by the mRNA vaccine.

In vaccinated patients, infection with the virus was not likely to be a cause or contributing factor for myocarditis since anti-Nucleoprotein IgG was not found in these patients.

In contrast to controls, the finding of high levels of unbound full-length spike protein in myocarditis patients may point to the mechanism by which this condition arises. Similarly, MIS-C patients had circulating SARS-CoV-2 antigens.

The spike protein appears to evade immune antibodies found at normal levels in these patients, with adequate functional and neutralization capacity. The spike may damage the cardiac pericytes or endothelium, perhaps by reducing the expression of the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), reducing nitric oxide production in the endothelium, or activating inflammation via integrins, causing the endothelium to become abnormally permeable

In a few words, as I have described in a thread about this publication a few weeks ago, one of the major differences between those adolescents and young adults who developed myocarditis post vaccination and those who didn't develop the condition, was the presence or the absence of free spike antigens respectively in the blood of these individuals.

One of the most important pieces of work in my opinion.

Children and young adults who have been vaccinated and developed myocarditis, did so, most likely due to the free spike protein and not due to infection by SARS-CoV-2.

Combining this information with the publication you linked earlier and I have also linked in other threads you get a very clear picture of what is going on.