It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It's Time for the Scientific Community to Admit We Were Wrong About COVID and It Cost Lives | Opinion
KEVIN BASS , MS MD/PHD STUDENT, MEDICAL SCHOOL
ON 1/30/23 AT 8:00 AM EST
As a medical student and researcher, I staunchly supported the efforts of the public health authorities when it came to COVID-19. I believed that the authorities responded to the largest public health crisis of our lives with compassion, diligence, and scientific expertise. I was with them when they called for lockdowns, vaccines, and boosters.
I was wrong. We in the scientific community were wrong. And it cost lives.
What we did not properly appreciate is that preferences determine how scientific expertise is used, and that our preferences might be—indeed, our preferences were—very different from many of the people that we serve. We created policy based on our preferences, then justified it using data. And then we portrayed those opposing our efforts as misguided, ignorant, selfish, and evil.
We made science a team sport, and in so doing, we made it no longer science. It became us versus them, and "they" responded the only way anyone might expect them to: by resisting.
When former President Trump pointed out the downsides of intervention, he was dismissed publicly as a buffoon. And when Dr. Antony Fauci opposed Trump and became the hero of the public health community, we gave him our support to do and say what he wanted, even when he was wrong.
Trump was not remotely perfect, nor were the academic critics of consensus policy. But the scorn that we laid on them was a disaster for public trust in the pandemic response. Our approach alienated large segments of the population from what should have been a national, collaborative project.
And we paid the price. The rage of the those marginalized by the expert class exploded onto and dominated social media. Lacking the scientific lexicon to express their disagreement, many dissidents turned to conspiracy theories and a cottage industry of scientific contortionists to make their case against the expert class consensus that dominated the pandemic mainstream. Labeling this speech "misinformation" and blaming it on "scientific illiteracy" and "ignorance," the government conspired with Big Tech to aggressively suppress it, erasing the valid political concerns of the government's opponents.
And we paid the price. The rage of the those marginalized by the expert class exploded onto and dominated social media. Lacking the scientific lexicon to express their disagreement, many dissidents turned to conspiracy theories and a cottage industry of scientific contortionists to make their case against the expert class consensus that dominated the pandemic mainstream. Labeling this speech "misinformation" and blaming it on "scientific illiteracy" and "ignorance," the government conspired with Big Tech to aggressively suppress it, erasing the valid political concerns of the government's opponents
originally posted by: DeathSlayer
Doing so will costs these doctors to loose their license to practice medicine.
Either they fall in line or leave the profession.
a reply to: Maxmars
originally posted by: Antimony
a reply to: Maxmars
And we paid the price. The rage of the those marginalized by the expert class exploded onto and dominated social media. Lacking the scientific lexicon to express their disagreement, many dissidents turned to conspiracy theories and a cottage industry of scientific contortionists to make their case against the expert class consensus that dominated the pandemic mainstream. Labeling this speech "misinformation" and blaming it on "scientific illiteracy" and "ignorance," the government conspired with Big Tech to aggressively suppress it, erasing the valid political concerns of the government's opponents
And yet still no expert I have seen can explain WHICH cells exactly the MRNA vaccine instructs to create spike proteins. All the literature just says that MRNA vaccines cause "cells" to create spike proteins but none ever say which cells? If it was immune cells, wouldn't they say that? So is it heart cells, skin cells, cells of various organs? We don't know and I suspect the "experts" don't really know either.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Maxmars
But if doctors have to start also bearing the brunt of the blame for questionable Covid-19 deaths and Covid Vaccine deaths, many more will be pushed over the edge.
originally posted by: Maxmars
a reply to: chris_stibrany
It makes me think of the opportunity that scientists threw away... here was yet another "The sky is falling" clarion about a virus which in the grand scheme of things was just "another bad flu virus" in the endless string of affliction-causing viruses. But this time we are going to hammer the world into our "likeness." While all the while the opposite approach was called for...
"Yes, this virus can be especially bad for many people who aren't physically equipped to resist it. We have an experimental vaccine which might help. Available to any who wants it... And yes, we know of measures that might help in the proper setting, under our supervision." But no... that's not how it went...
"For any interested, here is the data which your tax-dollars paid to collect... along with our analysis..." But no... that's not how it went...
Suddenly the scientific community collectively forgot how to count, forgot previous lessons learned in medicine, and found the sudden need to be "cheerleaders" for the "team."
originally posted by: TheWhiteKnight
That clarion call was precipitated specifically to depose Trump.
That evil 'populism' which threatened godkingthugs world wide.
Even while his ass being tied down with round the clock slanderous filth,
they needed this venom genetic splice bomb in order to get er done...
I realize it was sacrilege to suggest as much...
The damage to young minds may be intractable.