It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: fernalley
Is that "Just Transition" as in a fair one or "Just Transition" as in just do it and screw y'all.
originally posted by: lotusaugen
a reply to: Maxmars
Here is my suggestion for a fairer world:
Every millionaire/billionaire on this planet has to spend 50 percent of his wealth which is laying above one million.
originally posted by: Maxmars
It bears mentioning that the WEF is a business group.
- They hide behind the word "world" as if they somehow represent sovereignties or nations, but they only represent businesses.
- They hide behind the word "economic" as if they were somehow responsible to economies, but essentially, they are businesses who want to influence economic processes and policies to their business advantage.
- They hide behind the word "forum" as if it were about dialogue and deliberation, when in fact they are promoting policy for government/business partnerships. That, and the word "Combine" has negative connotations, as does "cartel" or "cabal."
Ironically, they cost many nations' governments many billions of their tax-payer dollars, while simultaneously being a Non Governmental Organization (NGO) who only makes 'recommendations.'
No one elects them.
They don't make policy for other nations, but many 'civilized' nations' leaders kowtow to their utterances as if they actually were subordinate to them.
The only entities they won't "decide at better way for" are banks. Think about that for a minute or two.
“Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals is essential for the future of humanity. The World Economic Forum is committed to supporting this effort, and working with the United Nations to build a more prosperous and equitable future,” said Klaus Schwab, World Economic Founder and Executive Chairman.
Financing the 2030 Agenda – Mobilize systems and accelerate finance flows toward the 2030 Agenda and the UN Sustainable Development Goals, taking forward solutions to increase long-term SDG investments.
We could always make a 'sliding scale' right? The richer you are the more we take away? But of course, there are so many poor... but even they must bear some of the burden for the sake of equality... so they would pay less, yes? But the rich can always claim that relatively speaking the poor are getting a 'free ride,' no? And in the rare case of a poor person amassing wealth through labor and circumstance... then they should be made to pay more. This is not a system which can thrive in harmoniously in the real world.
The globalists absolutely hate sovereignty. It is the single most difficult hurdle to overcome, as the pandemic narrative failure clearly illustrates.