“A New System” – Inside the Davos Summit 2023

a reply to: interupt42

I've thought about it, and I still think the principle holds. My point rather is that eventually the game will be up.

People have been noting the global posture manipulations since well before I was born. There is some very good literature out there on the topic, but a lot of it seems - well.. poorly edited. An example comes to mind; "Conspirator's Hierarchy: The story of the Committee of 300"by Dr. John Coleman... that book was jam-packed with conspiracy theory material, but the writing style is problematic and hard to digest.

Knowledge is power. And history is replete with forgotten lessons and missed cues.

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: fernalley

Is that "Just Transition" as in a fair one or "Just Transition" as in just do it and screw y'all.

It will be messy, ugly and in no way can they transition all those well paying jobs which would ultimatly damage the whole country. At any rate the feds are saying the leaked memo was read wrong and they didn’t mean it quite like that. Some backtracking going on. Trudeau is a WEF stooge

Another pattern that sticks out to me is that all those things that they are "brainstorming a new solution for" are the things they planned to happen already. They planned it and made it happen, and now they want to solve what they already did.

The "solving" will be a lot worse than what they already created.

The WEF must be destroyed. Obliterated for the sake of humans everywhere.

originally posted by: lotusaugen
a reply to: Maxmars

Here is my suggestion for a fairer world:

Every millionaire/billionaire on this planet has to spend 50 percent of his wealth which is laying above one million.

This wouldn't work for several reasons. First, they could just spend their money at their own businesses. Second, suddenly putting that much money into active circulation would cause massive inflation, which would raise the cost of living. Third, they could convert their money into assets which are harder to track and tax such as precious metals and crypto.

What might work is simply making billionaires destroy 50% of their dollars. They could also just give it to the government so the government could afford to solve big problems, but that may also cause inflation. If the government kept it as a backup reserve and only used it to cover deficit spending, instead of printing more money, it could work.

Fundamentally I don't agree with any sort of wealth redistribution mechanism because it verges into the realm of communist economics. The biggest reason our economy has reached such an unequal distribution of wealth is because they continually create more currency and most of it flows to the same people who already own everything.

a reply to: Maxmars

There are some polices what they planned in WEF event this week for Ukraine.

It bears mentioning that the WEF is a business group.

- They hide behind the word "world" as if they somehow represent sovereignties or nations, but they only represent businesses.
- They hide behind the word "economic" as if they were somehow responsible to economies, but essentially, they are businesses who want to influence economic processes and policies to their business advantage.
- They hide behind the word "forum" as if it were about dialogue and deliberation, when in fact they are promoting policy for government/business partnerships. That, and the word "Combine" has negative connotations, as does "cartel" or "cabal."

Ironically, they cost many nations' governments many billions of their tax-payer dollars, while simultaneously being a Non Governmental Organization (NGO) who only makes 'recommendations.'

No one elects them.

They don't make policy for other nations, but many 'civilized' nations' leaders kowtow to their utterances as if they actually were subordinate to them.

The only entities they won't "decide at better way for" are banks. Think about that for a minute or two.

originally posted by: Maxmars
It bears mentioning that the WEF is a business group.

- They hide behind the word "world" as if they somehow represent sovereignties or nations, but they only represent businesses.
- They hide behind the word "economic" as if they were somehow responsible to economies, but essentially, they are businesses who want to influence economic processes and policies to their business advantage.
- They hide behind the word "forum" as if it were about dialogue and deliberation, when in fact they are promoting policy for government/business partnerships. That, and the word "Combine" has negative connotations, as does "cartel" or "cabal."

Ironically, they cost many nations' governments many billions of their tax-payer dollars, while simultaneously being a Non Governmental Organization (NGO) who only makes 'recommendations.'

No one elects them.

They don't make policy for other nations, but many 'civilized' nations' leaders kowtow to their utterances as if they actually were subordinate to them.

The only entities they won't "decide at better way for" are banks. Think about that for a minute or two.

The WEF also merged with the UN Agenda 2030 on June 2019 to accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

“Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals is essential for the future of humanity. The World Economic Forum is committed to supporting this effort, and working with the United Nations to build a more prosperous and equitable future,” said Klaus Schwab, World Economic Founder and Executive Chairman.

World Economic Forum and UN Sign Strategic Partnership Framework


Interesting that they priortize the financing.

Financing the 2030 Agenda – Mobilize systems and accelerate finance flows toward the 2030 Agenda and the UN Sustainable Development Goals, taking forward solutions to increase long-term SDG investments.

Isnt that where the banks fit in? With the ESG reporting they can steer invesments away from the undesirables.

This was published today by CNBC from Davos

Bank of America CEO says capitalism needs cleaning up with new global ESG rules

We need A New System where civil rights do not have the term “nice to have” associated with them in some businesses plan.

The problem is all these “business professionals” attending the same colleges where “6% or more” is the only measure of success. Patagonia, North Face, coffee collectives, etc., show that you can be “environmentally conscious” and still have a successful, sustainable, business.

WEcF (vs ENvironmental, funny they are using the same acronym? Surprised those bastids don’t use a panda as their mascot as well!) is the reason we get ridiculous stories from the Media like Lucky Charms being magically nutritious!!

Remember kids, eat more bugs!

I think that their narrow view point blinds them to alternatives. Coal is dead. Nuclear fusion is coming. And this notion of money as monetary value will be changed from the “this much equals that thing” to some version of Star Trek. And that vision needs dreamers not 70 year old business men set in their ways.

We go to space! They can sit around in their own crap [eta: and plastic adult diapers] fighting over land and money!!

Let’s dissolve into the future!!

a reply to: Maxmars

We could always make a 'sliding scale' right? The richer you are the more we take away? But of course, there are so many poor... but even they must bear some of the burden for the sake of equality... so they would pay less, yes? But the rich can always claim that relatively speaking the poor are getting a 'free ride,' no? And in the rare case of a poor person amassing wealth through labor and circumstance... then they should be made to pay more. This is not a system which can thrive in harmoniously in the real world.

Not to mention it’s what we already have: a Marxist progressive income tax

a reply to: Maxmars
Ms covid lockdown Queen is reportedly in attendance. She already has a political record of influencing the economy. Should be real fun.

a reply to: Maxmars

The globalists absolutely hate sovereignty. It is the single most difficult hurdle to overcome, as the pandemic narrative failure clearly illustrates.

Absolutely correct. That is why they and their minions continually rail against anything “nationalist” or being a patriot of a particular country, because they are internationalists, and have no loyalty to any country. Prof Antony Sutton wrote about this.

Yes the old world order is being replaced by a new world order.

There are various dark-occultic factions with contrasting perspectives.

Some say 20% today want to come completely outright about their dominion over the human-race.

Whereas 80% today want to remain occulted (hidden) conducting their dominion in the shadows as has been the case for century after century after century.

Regardless they are ultimately one as their ultimate goal is one.