It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I was the lead author of a peer-reviewed study that reanalyzed the original Pfizer and the Moderna clinical trials for the messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccines.
We found the vaccine increased serious adverse events at a rate of one in 800.
At the time of publication, my co-authors and I did not believe our single study warranted the withdrawal of the messenger RNA vaccines from the market.
However, since its publication, multiple new pieces of evidence have come to light, and this has caused me to reevaluate my position.
Pfizer clearly states in the supply contract that the injections are not going to be the same as the clinical trial injections AND it has no clue as to long-term effects or efficacy AND there may be unknown adverse effects that are, presumably, ABOVE and BEYOND the adverse event rate of 24% in the injected group of 21,900 in the Pfizer phase 3 clinical trials v 6% in the 21,900 placebo group in those trials.
According to FDA Surveillance Data, the Pfizer COVID vaccine increases the risk of lung blood clots by 50%.
FDA finally admitted Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine had been linked to blood clotting in older individuals based on the result of one of the largest studies of elderly persons aged 65 years and above.
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
originally posted by: musicismagic
Everyone was in a rush at the time.
The Speed of science.
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: v1rtu0s0
It's Joseph Fraiman, why not just quote creepy uncle Brandon saying that we should give up our guns and leave the windows on our daughters bedrooms open.
His "paper" found that there was a 0.125 perfect risk, but if you got back to it and look at the link provided by the op you'll see that around 1 in 4 if those people were either in the placebo group or actually had covid itself and weren't suffering vax reactions.
Tell me, what is 0. 125 percent when you factor that in!
It's a risk that's a fraction of a percent, that's what it is.
originally posted by: ChaoticOrder
a reply to: MykeNukem
Unfortunately nothing will happen to the people behind this atrocity, that would mean admitting they were wrong this entire time and would result in immense backlash, not to mention how much it would erode public trust in science and government institutions. It seems to me there is a rigorous effort to control the flow of information in recent times, in an attempt to control how people think. What's sad is they have quite effectively gained control over the minds of many people and those they can't control are made to feel like crazy outcasts of society. They will not easily relinquish that control.
originally posted by: Meldionne1
it didn’t roll out until after his presidency
originally posted by: LordAhriman
originally posted by: Meldionne1
it didn’t roll out until after his presidency
Who wants to tell em?
Anyway. This won't hurt Trump, because the vast majority of billions of people who got these vaccines are absolutely fine.
originally posted by: LordAhriman
originally posted by: Meldionne1
it didn’t roll out until after his presidency
Who wants to tell em?
Anyway. This won't hurt Trump, because the vast majority of billions of people who got these vaccines are absolutely fine.
originally posted by: LordAhriman
originally posted by: Meldionne1
it didn’t roll out until after his presidency
Who wants to tell em?
Anyway. This won't hurt Trump, because the vast majority of billions of people who got these vaccines are absolutely fine.
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
vaccinate let's say over 200 million Americans with these products. Can you do the math? You are getting over 250,000 serious adverse reactions in the short term (including deaths). The medium and long term effects are not known unless you are not LordAhriman but a prophet with magical powers.