The Cancer Cure Cover-Up for 40 years

a reply to: GODISNOWHERE

Then there was Ignas Semmelweis ....the doctor who said washing your hands before doing surgery saves lives.

Semmelweis' contribution was recognized 20 years after his death as the medical world became more receptive and wiser after germ theory of disease by Louis Pasteur and concept of antisepsis by Joseph Lister. He was hailed as the “Father of hand hygiene,” the “Father of infection control,” and “Savior of mothers.”

The weight of authority stood against his teachings.

a reply to: GODISNOWHERE
And before him in 1535 Jacques Cartier learning from the natives about the use of tree bark and needles from the white pine, rich in antioxidants and vitamin c stirred into a drink produced immediate improvement and swift recovery from scurvy was laughed at upon his return to Europe as he shared his learned knowledge. His peers were “amused by such witch doctor cures of ignorant savages” and did nothing to follow it up…sound familiar?

We call that "Bush Tea" where I live, it has many benefits and uses in survival situations. I use cedar (only twice a week), pine, spruce, and willow bark, as a regular drink when I'm "out" in the bush.

Excellent post. I'll check that book out too.

OP: Great thread, I'll watch the video tonight. I've read some of his work.

The only cure I am aware aware of or rather the only time I am aware of people “beating” cancer at least in my own life is full surgical removal. I’ve seen both sides of the treatment, chemo and cutting it out. The people who have it cut out seems to be fine for many many years assuming they get it all. The chemo folks not so much. Usually they convince people to do both cut it out then treatment.

My grandfather had cancer 2 years ago 88 they said the surgery would probably kill him and he should do chemo. He felt that he was already dead if he had the cancer and that chemo would surely kill him. He took the surgery, recovered and is still cancer free. Granted he is almost at the end of his ride here no one lives for ever but The extra time he got allowed him to meet my son his great grand son it meant the absolute world to him.

Sadly another person in my life a wife of a acquaintance had breast cancer and chose chemo over mastectomy. Sadly the cancer spread during treatment and well talking to her husband is heart breaking, his advice to me was if this ever happens to you or your wife cut it out get it cut out as quick as you can. Don’t wait don’t delay.


I’ve had a mass growing in my chest/ribcage for a month plus now, the Canadian medical system is so bunk it took forever to see a doctor my scans are on the 18th wish me luck.

a reply to: 727Sky

Here's a thought from medical practices: we can't, don't, won't....declare anything, nothing...as unusual...just varying degrees of "normal aberrations. We go from there ..

I perform triage...and can get a ton of info just watching someone laying there.

Mom had 7 surgs....breast, stomach, uterine and bi polar both lungs. Passed age 80. Every member of my family passed from Cancer and Cardiac. Everyone.

Of course there's no real-one sided answer to cure the population normal or not.

In a ambulance hell bent flying to ER...only 1 things certain: I made you go...so hate us, I don't care...at least your alive to be p----ed at us...

There can be cures for diseases...but too? There can never be any cure, that would work on everyone, every age, every infirmity...at the same time.

Generally?( don't kill me here!)...it's vax n scripts, treatments and therapies PER patient...x whats "normal" x how they got here...so we understand...there is no "normal", no singular cure effective for every person.

Going w that...Cancer is big business like all the other nasty maladies in the world.

As always, take care of your health n God Bless.

1st Responder /EMT
I.C.S, Incident Command
Retired

a reply to: Creep Thumper
I have lost my sister and 3 close friends to cancer and have 2 friends, 1 in remission and the other about to go into end of life hospice. I also have seen the devastating effects of Chemo and radiotherapy, but they only seem to prolong the inevitable. ! friend had stomach cancer and went to Spain for an intensive course of marijuana treatment. Cured the stomach cancer but 3 tears later developed more cancers elsewhere, which took her away from us.
I know and you now know that the conventional route does not work (curing) only delaying but if I was in the position that was inevitable and I was going to die anyway, I would try Burzynskis treatment just on the of chance it may work.
Look at it this way, if he was a charlatan he would have been in court years ago. Which he has been and the FDA or any other so called specialists could prove his treatment false. If that doesn't convince you then there is no hope for it.

a reply to: 727Sky

From what I read on the internet it's the very lack of proper clinical trials that concerns people. What also concerns people is the large amount of money he makes from his treatments and the very litigious approach he takes to people who disagree with him. You can't complain about the medical sector making a lot of money (which it undoubtedbly does) by holding up someone who makes a lot of money out of medical treatment as some kind of saviour.

Does his treatment work? I don't know. He seems to have just as many dead patients as any other kind of doctor. If his treatment does work, does it mean that the conventional approaches of surgery chemo and radiotherapy don't? No, it doesn't. The reason the conventional medical approaches to cancer treatments are used is because they can be very effective. My own surgery, chemo and radiotherapy is testament to that.

I haven't watched the video yet, but GcMAF (Gc protein-derived macrophage-activating factor) is a treatment that's been around for a couple decades. Highly suppressed (and a mysterious death), but you can still get it through a Canadian company.

The short of how it works is that cancers stop the body from producing a certain glycoprotein. That glycoprotein is what tells the body to fight the cancer. No more glycoprotein means the body stops fighting the cancer. This glycoprotein can be synthesized and then administered into the body, and when that happens, the body can reactivate the dormant macrophage cells and start fighting the cancer again.

A year's worth of treatment used to be about $5k, not sure what it is these days, but a drop in the bucket compared to traditional methods.

Hmmm. en.wikipedia.org...

So, if you consume or inhale the ingredients and do not pee them out too much......

Ammonia is created by nicotinic acid/nicotine coupled with methyl compounds which is sort of like coffee and cigarettes and this helps to increase the production of this compound in the body. Hmmm. Hot peppers with coffee would do the same thing I suppose. so would more of certain veggies coupled with coffee. I suppose that coffee could be replaced with members of the mint family too. It appears that this chemistry intensifies the immune system to attack cancer cells...rapidly developing cells....you need the methyl group though for niacin to work correctly.

Looking for ways to boost this anticancer chemistry in the body naturally to keep people from getting cancer in the first place. Far different than the other ways I have found to keep cancer from taking over.

Something to research as another way of stopping cancer I suppose.

Fair enough. Certainly not conclusive evidence I agree but indicates the worthiness of a closer look at the question imho. His use of the words “our” and “we” are particularly suggestive. a reply to: noonebutme

My stepmother recently received a “one hundred percent” clear bill of health regarding her cancer after chemo so I’m inclined to agree although since then there have been some indications she may not be out of the woods yet. I pray I’m wrong and that all is well in that regard. There is a compound found in nature that some refer to as a holistic form of chemotherapy that only cancerous cells are susceptible to while healthy cells have protection from. I’m still trying to wrap my head around it but if interested one can learn more from G. Edward Griffins book full of footnoted studies on the subject, A World Without Cancer.
a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

a reply to: 727Sky

Welp, he's not shut down and his rather large clinic is right there (or here) in Houston and he's been there for over 45 years, so the idea that he's somehow been driven underground and so forth doesn't hold up. Here's his website Members of Congress have stepped up in the past to advocate for constituents to receive treatment.

You'll have to collect around $200,000 for treatment (probably more. That's about the mid-range. Breakdown of the costs on this website.

Me, I wouldn't recommend it, particularly after reading the Wikipedia articles and looking at the trial results - nor would I send a family member there. Wikipedia article Other scientists have tried the same technique and haven't seen any remarkable results. If they had, there'd be a lot of clinics offering this and Big Pharma would be happy to sell the products.




...after all, if you die, they can't sell you meds for allergies and weight loss and hair loss and testosterone and so on and so forth.

So many examples of this throughout the history of our sciences. The Wright brothers were laughed at for suggesting a machine could fly. Columbus for suggesting the world was round and before him, there was the Galileo affair. Before him, Bruno was burned at the stake for saying the earth was not the center and in the field of medicine William Harvey was disgraced as a physician for believing that blood was pumped by the heart and moved around the body through arteries. William Roentgen was a quack with his weird x-rays and then there was William Jenner with his vaccine against smallpox, also called a quack and a cruel one at that…he did apparently test them on his own children after all. And so on and so on and so on until here we are today where the pattern continues. If you want to build a boat you should try first to sink it in the shallows before setting sail into the deep. We would all do well to try arguing for our intellectual opponents point. It will at least be invigorating and at most be illuminating. With the exception of those who oppose for the sake of opposition alone.
a reply to: Itisnowagain

I highly recommend it. I’ll need at least 3 readings before I can illustrate it’s worthiness properly. Many thanks and happy hunting! Keep an eye out for apricots ;]
a reply to: MykeNukem

A colleague recently described a similar experience as your grandfathers. Got one removed from his chest and never looked back. Seems strong as an ox on the construction site to this day. Heartwarming to hear about yours being able to meet your little one. Saddened to hear about your pals experience knowing how common it appears to be today. Please do look into the trophoblast theory of cancer. I’m probably starting to sound like a broken wheel in this thread but what I’m reading gives me hope that there is much we can do to improve our health and well being while waiting for medicine to catch up. G. Edward Griffin A World Without Cancer. This is not new and like Burzynski has been “debunked” by mainstream medicine many times over but it’s worth a look if you’ve time and interest. Could it be that vitamin c is not the only essential vitamin without which disease will overcome us? Could it be that vitamin c IS the only essential vitamin without which disease will overcome us? Wishing for you health and wellness either way.
a reply to: Athetos

It’s what happens when compartmentalisation occurs. Just because you can’t conceive of it doesn’t mean it isn’t true lol.

a reply to: noonebutme

a reply to: noonebutme

I’m not saying the FDA are saints or in the right. But i see ZERO evidence of a NWO or sinister shadowy group running the world. That’s a cop out for blaming perceived unfair injustices to something tangible.

It’s probably those dark shades and those fingers in your ears! Try doing the tiniest bit of research on the CFR, then wonder to yourself why exactly do top bosses from the big corporations and senior politicians fly out to Davos to meet at WEF or bilderburg, what do you imagine they are discussing in these meetings? At a summit in Saudi Arabia they were openly calling for a world government. Even the UN has its Agenda 2030. It’s all about how they can better manage and control “the cannon fodder” (which is us) fair enough if they were ascended masters with our best interests at heart, but they are certified psychopaths as proved by their words and deeds..

The FDA, the WHO all these organisations belong to them and simply can’t be trusted.

BTW there have been numerous cures for cancer that have been actively suppressed over the years, just look at how hard the tobacco companies fought to keep there profit at the cost of people’s health. That’s the kind of world we live in..

Yes, I believe it has been covered up, just like the guy way back who invented a pill that turned water into gasoline. No one ever heard from him again. There is a very small company (Halberd Corp) doing research on eliminating blood viruses, including cancers, using laser eradication and having spectacular results. However, no one reports on it. Wonder why? And I'm sure Big Pharma wants to crush them too.

a reply to: crayzeed

I'm old and disgusted with what is going on in the world. It is no loss to me to just let cancer take me.

a reply to: 727Sky

The theory that there's too much money to be made off of cancer rings very true for the United States. This is one of the reasons IMO why transgenderism has been massively pushed by lobbyists also. A profit driven health system.

However the same is not true for countries that have a National Health Service like the UK. Or the majority of the world that has some form of universial health care.

So no, I don't believe there has been a cure for cancer. Unless its the USA and only the USA that has found the cure.

a reply to: Creep Thumper

Amen.. i feel you brother