It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Data is provisional and subject to change.

page: 1
8

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 30 2022 @ 12:18 AM
link   
I was wondering how government departments which are tasked with putting the correct figures out to inform the public, would deal with anomalies that are disruptive to their agenda. The obvious way is to put out provisional data which can be changed. The Australian death rate is a case in point, Tim truth notes that the trend line is still going up. So if taken to task the government get out, is to say they are provisional and subject to change. So getting firm actionable data from a government source will be problematic, if they are directly the cause of the rising death rate due to mandated policies. I mention this because they are at odds with anecdotal evidence from major funeral directors, Insurance companies, along with other observed anecdotal sources. So are the government figures pure fiction to hide the reality? www.bitchute.com...

You will note that this insurance actuary nine months ago stated that deaths were up forty percent, the government Trend line although government admits to nothing like that, it is the insurance companies that will be the best source because their survival is based on good risk analysis. www.bitchute.com...
edit on 30-11-2022 by anonentity because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 30 2022 @ 12:22 AM
link   
a reply to: anonentity
You do understand that we live in a world of lives now these days.



posted on Nov, 30 2022 @ 12:29 AM
link   
a reply to: musicismagic

Oh lies, yes indeed.



posted on Nov, 30 2022 @ 12:40 AM
link   
a reply to: anonentity


This happens a lot more than people realize. There is a nearly never-ending stream of reasons that data can be proclaimed as non-evidentiary. They would always be the case when these outrageous numbers surface... but

... it has become clear that this can no longer fly when the public turns its persistent eye to scrutinize the numbers (you see, you have to explain over and over that no one has, or can have, the right numbers - it get's old)

To alleviate themselves from accountability they begin to use caveats about the data upfront - eliminating the need to be responsible entirely) ... never a caveat that states "these are the official numbers" but always that they are subject to change, may be incorrect, or even "you have to be a genius expert to understand the complexity of the numbers"...

Look at a simple problem of tallying votes... the more we advance in science and engineering - the longer it takes to count.

edit on 11/30/2022 by Maxmars because: formatting - dang it!

edit on 11/30/2022 by Maxmars because: grammar



posted on Nov, 30 2022 @ 12:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Maxmars

We are also being offered a plethora of distractions to confuse, where did the Ukraine war go, it's waiting for China.



posted on Nov, 30 2022 @ 01:10 AM
link   
It makes sense that vaccine injury data plays by the same rules as voter data.



posted on Nov, 30 2022 @ 01:24 AM
link   
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Yes they would have to move on the data generation at some stage. At the same time, ER and ambulance waiting times are getting worse.



posted on Nov, 30 2022 @ 05:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: anonentity
I was wondering how government departments which are tasked with putting the correct figures out to inform the public, would deal with anomalies that are disruptive to their agenda. The obvious way is to put out provisional data which can be changed. The Australian death rate is a case in point, Tim truth notes that the trend line is still going up. So if taken to task the government get out, is to say they are provisional and subject to change. So getting firm actionable data from a government source will be problematic, if they are directly the cause of the rising death rate due to mandated policies. I mention this because they are at odds with anecdotal evidence from major funeral directors, Insurance companies, along with other observed anecdotal sources. So are the government figures pure fiction to hide the reality? www.bitchute.com...

You will note that this insurance actuary nine months ago stated that deaths were up forty percent, the government Trend line although government admits to nothing like that, it is the insurance companies that will be the best source because their survival is based on good risk analysis. www.bitchute.com...


If they can support the narrative via the current data then the reasonable course of action is to change the data!

In science we drop the hypothesis when the data cannot verify it but in politics they manipulate and change the data to fit their narrative.

That's the difference between science & politics.

Nobody can trust the Australian Government or the Canadian Government or the US Government.
They are simply unreliable and are known to have deceived their people and have repeatedly lied to them.



posted on Nov, 30 2022 @ 11:11 AM
link   
I saw an article about European excess deaths. It was a stupid high number. It was blamed on the heatwave. I guess this is possible.......



new topics

top topics



 
8

log in

join