It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Died Suddenly Live now

page: 7
42
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 25 2022 @ 09:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
God that you accept the BBC is a source of state sponsored misinformation and disinformation.


Don't know. I don't pay them much attention. I DO know that the Stew Peters Network is a steaming pile of hot garbage. Grifting the gullible.


Well you have kind of admitted it but if you do pay some more attention ot should be even more obvious to you.



posted on Nov, 25 2022 @ 09:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Weapons of mass destruction?

The BBC did not argue anything of the sort.

They just reported what was being said by Colin Powell and Tony Bliar.

Which turned out to be lies, of course.

In general the BBC has a good reputation here.

It was fairly critical of the Iraq wars and is hardly pro Govt.



Let me refer you back to my message above. Repetition is very important for learning


The BBC through the power of its credibility and reputation takes scraps of the truth and distorts them massively to tell and present a misleading story


You are verifying what I and others have said on numerous occasions. I.e in the absence of religious beliefs, those who are on the left part of the ideological spectrum try to fill the gaps by believing in institutions such as the BBC and the 'science'.

And then reality hits you very hard...



posted on Nov, 25 2022 @ 10:30 AM
link   
a reply to: Asmodeus3

I'm not "on the left".

Generally speaking, the news as reported by the BBC is a lot less biased and partisan than say, US media.

It's pretty fair and accurate.

As for quasi religious beliefs, I'm seeing quite a lot of that in this thread.



posted on Nov, 25 2022 @ 11:36 AM
link   
a reply to: crankyoldman





here is how I feel about this stuff. I have only watched about 15 mnutesof video. I wated until the J&J vax was available to get it and my dear hubby and daughter all got that. We have had no bosters and will not ever get them Me and Hubby over 70, daughter in 50s. I recently had a relaps of metastatic breast cancer after 10 years into my bones. During th course of treating this, I was told I had a DVT in my leg. But I am on blood thinner meds
i have taken for over 11 years due to to DNA mutation I hav e that causes my bone marrow to make to many red blood cells. I won't live very much longer. I'm really sorry that the world has come to this. I can't see any good in the future. My great grandchildren have a bleak future.



posted on Nov, 25 2022 @ 01:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3

I'm not "on the left".

Generally speaking, the news as reported by the BBC is a lot less biased and partisan than say, US media.

It's pretty fair and accurate.

As for quasi religious beliefs, I'm seeing quite a lot of that in this thread.


Everyone from the UK sounds very left on these threads. In general the impression given is usually middle age left or leftish individuals who have invested a lot in institutions that are morally bankrupt such as the BBC, the 'Science' or let's say a weird version of it (evident to all of us who have actually graduated from real universities) and others.

I don't share your beliefs when it comes to the BBC..it is just a belief and a product of indoctrination.



posted on Nov, 25 2022 @ 01:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Asmodeus3

How patronizing.

By the way, I graduated from a very real University, with Honours.

Everyone from the UK on here sounds "very left"?

Really?!!!!



posted on Nov, 25 2022 @ 01:53 PM
link   
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Sorry but that video was nonsense and in fact was filled with lies. The sad part about medical doom porn is that so many fall for it.

Why do you give people who create those laughable videos credibility? It only makes people ignore any message you may have.



posted on Nov, 25 2022 @ 01:55 PM
link   
a reply to: Asmodeus3

OK, so if one source lies it's OK for another to lie?

Be real. That video is crap.



posted on Nov, 25 2022 @ 01:57 PM
link   
a reply to: asabuvsobelow

You don't even know my stance?

I will not give an intentionally dishonest video a pass. Nobody else should either.



posted on Nov, 25 2022 @ 02:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3

How patronizing.

By the way, I graduated from a very real University, with Honours.

Everyone from the UK on here sounds "very left"?

Really?!!!!


Everyone who takes part in these threads I meant and not everyone in general. This is my impression. It looks like the BBC is an institution to be protected but I don't see it this way.

Coming back to the origin of these exchange of replies, when someone tries to discuss about the credibility of the documentary which is the topic of the thread, it's better not to use the BBC as the source of information as the corporation is regarded as highly biased and a source of misinformation and disinformation.

In addition of anyone tried to make a simple Google search with the relevant words then there is a lot of material to be revealed.
edit on 25-11-2022 by Asmodeus3 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 25 2022 @ 02:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: Blaine91555
a reply to: Asmodeus3

OK, so if one source lies it's OK for another to lie?

Be real. That video is crap.


I haven't made any comments about the video itself. I made a comment about the source of information used to debunk the video.



posted on Nov, 25 2022 @ 02:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Asmodeus3

My apologies then. The video is still intentional bunk.



posted on Nov, 25 2022 @ 02:41 PM
link   
a reply to: Asmodeus3

What part of "on here" did you miss?

Only regarded as such by likes of you?

Do you watch/listen to it enough to have such an informed opinion?

I suppose us Brits are all sheeple or such toss.

How patronizing.

Again.
edit on 25-11-2022 by Oldcarpy2 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 25 2022 @ 02:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3

What part of "on here" did you miss?

Only regarded as such by likes of you?

Do you watch/listen to it enough to have such an informed opinion?

I suppose us Brits are all sheeple or such toss.

How patronizing.

Again.


I have discussed about the credibility of the source which is used to debunk the video, i.e the BBC, which is non credible and unreliable. Yes the BBC transmits its propaganda everywhere not only in the UK. But those who believe in its noble existence can't see what reality holds for them.



posted on Nov, 25 2022 @ 03:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Well, I suppose we will have to just agree to disagree before this drifts any further.

I have a grip on reality and not shonky biased videos made by folk with bunk agendas.



posted on Nov, 25 2022 @ 03:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Well, I suppose we will have to just agree to disagree before this drifts any further.

I have a grip on reality and not shonky biased videos made by folk with bunk agendas.


Still I haven't made any comparisons between the video itself and the source that allegedly discredits the video. The source itself is not the best one to start given its bias. Whether the video itself is bunk is another conversation that some of others here have. The BBC is nothing more than a state owned propaganda machinery and it's quite left leaning. That describes it best regardless who is in Government. I don't think there are many who still trust the MSM with their nonsensical predictions, fear mongering, propaganda, coercive and deceptive tactics, and so on. Especially in the last three years...



posted on Nov, 25 2022 @ 03:25 PM
link   
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Like I said, let's just agree to disagree.

I have no interest in arguing the toss with you about the BBC.



posted on Nov, 25 2022 @ 03:33 PM
link   
If you watched the entire video or even half, yet still have the same frame of mind on trusting the intentions of the V pushers, you may be under the coin. You can directly feel the truth in the words of some of those whistleblowers. Chilling though not surprising at this point in life. Most of these VAX need a good looking at these days, not just the new dog in town. This is not the only method of depop being used.



posted on Nov, 25 2022 @ 03:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: NautPsycho
If you watched the entire video or even half, yet still have the same frame of mind on trusting the intentions of the V pushers, you may be under the coin. You can directly feel the truth in the words of some of those whistleblowers. Chilling though not surprising at this point in life. Most of these VAX need a good looking at these days, not just the new dog in town. This is not the only method of depop being used.


The V pushers have been dealt properly long time ago and their arguments have been shown to be at least false if not suspicious and deceptive.

You don't need this particular video to get an idea of the most absurd and ludicrous campaign we have ever witnessed.



posted on Nov, 25 2022 @ 03:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Asmodeus3

You conflate "V pushers" and confuse them with those like me who have never "pushed" vaccines on anyone but just object to those pushing lies and their transparent agendas on here.

You always talk as if only antivaxxers are right and anyone who questions your narrative must be indoctrinated sheep who are less intelligent than you.

And are absurd and ludicrous.

You have zero respect for others opinions.

It's like arguing with cult members.



new topics

top topics



 
42
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join