Ancient Earth and her creatures like the mega fauna did not all die out just became much smaller

Due to Earth's atmosphere and temperature we have all heard there were some big Mega Fauna in the past. The Average temperature way back when was around 73 degrees where as today the average world temp is around 57. The oxygen content was 31% compared to 21% today plus the atmosphere was about double the pressure of today allowing for big bugs and creatures that could not fly in today's current atmospheric pressure.

This is a great video IMO and explains how not all our mega fauna died out and how many things that flew would never get off the ground in today's atmosphere. youtu.be...

How did Humanoids miss this size thing? 😁

a reply to: xuenchen

How did Humanoids miss this size thing? 😁

Right? Giants were real.

I am curious What evidence we have found of Human activity in the 1000 or so years prior to the younger dryas.

a reply to: pureblood69

Depends on what you want, Wall's that may be more ancient and artificial than the current paradigm allows such as one in new zealand were the infqamous Kaimanawa wall which is obviously artificial is claimed to be natural since accepting there was a culture there before the Maori would throw treatise that are still important and politically sensitive to both community's into dispute and of course Rockwall in Texas attested by some to be a natural structure but by others to be definitely an ancient artificial structure.


The magnetic alignment of the rocks of the ancient and buried rock wall are usually used to back up the claim it is a natural feature, but of course while they will trumpet that as proof, they will ignore features that show artificiality and even hide them if they can.

Then what about the fact that many sites claimed by classical civilizations may have been simply re-used, stonework from these later cultures seems far inferior to whoever originally built the strucures they later incorporated into their own cultures.

Of course, the Bosnian pyramids have met almost immovable resistance due not to their structure or the fact they are probably artificial but the fact they throw the current paradigm about human history into complete dispute and that is percieved as a threat by those with bursary's and who have built their careers upon the current paradigm pushing theory as fact.


Let's have a look at an oopart, one of a vast number of objects found in rock strata where they are according to the current paradigm not supposed to be because if the current paradigm was correct, they could never have been found where they were found.
Just one example as there is literally too many to put here.

a reply to: 727Sky

Loving that channel, she seems to be looking at similar sites to Mystery History as well as doing her own research and then picking the parts she can prove as well as bringing some new stuff to the table such as the cataclysm damage on so many ancient structures that is too severe to be simple erosion.

I was not doing three comments one after the other but actually posted a reply meant for another thread accidentally on this, two tabs open?.

But I will make use of it by adding this very interesting link to a site that an author was pushing some theories for his book, but it is a very good theory, and he has plenty to back up his ideas.

If he is correct some of these structures and ruin's may be very ancient indeed.
beforeatlantis.com...

An excerpt from the site reads.

We propose that these sites were first established tens of thousands of years ago when the climate was less arid than it is today and that the Oxus and preceding civilizations in this region were the descendants of an even earlier civilization that existed up until the time of the last ice age.

I've noticed that lots of animals had giant predecessors

we had giant wooly elephants & rhinos
giant snake ('titanaboa')
giant beaver (castoreum)
giant sloth
giant cat (sabre tooth)
giant dog (Dire Wolf)
giant whales
of course giant reptiles, esp crocs
giant land birds. oddly, I'm not aware of giant flying birds, unless the pterosours etc count

science is great!

a reply to: ElGoobero

Other than the legend of the Thunder bird there are many legends such as the Rock etc.

But in reality, we only know of a few.

This huge creature once called south America home, it is claimed it flew over south America before the Andes were pushed up.


More recently within the last thousand years humans in New Zealand hunted down the last known great bird, a real Rock if you will and one that would probably have mistaken them for prey which is probably why the Maori hunted it down.


There were probably larger species of birds, but we only know of those we have evidence for.

Also, the upper limit for the size of these birds is not really known, we only have estimates for the remains that have been found so they could in fact have reached much larger sizes or had larger subspecies.

a reply to: 727Sky

This has been the number 1 topic I’ve been reading about recently… and there are a lot of rabbit holes.

You didn’t hear it from me, but take a closer look at rock formations….and not just ones online.
Go on Google Earth and just do some tours on your own, or actually in person.

We’ve been told lies.

Small man blues? No, conceded? Yes. None of those monuments are fortifications or of the sorts but psychological evolution. Psychological Evolution, that is, a fancy term for being conceded but it made sense just like those other finds thought to be mechanical masterpieces or tools but no they weren't. Simply fantasizing or dreaming up ideas that could be or what ifs like a child painting a picture and showing it to his/her mom with a (It's a boat or something) yet nothing of the sorts.

It's understandable to wonder there might have been a much larger scale to life in general at the past but realistically even if true it's just an illusion because obviously there is no comparison.
For instance they (back then) could have said the same about today and they wouldn't be wrong.
After all, how many people did you say are currently part of the planets population?
No need to answer, just a hint of sarcasm. No ill intent really.

reply to: 727Sky
Yet, continuing to watch the video posted.

Maybe it is something to do with how you folks think. a reply to: JAGStorm

Back in those days Pot plants were a hundred feet tall?

originally posted by: xuenchen
How did Humanoids miss this size thing? 😁

sardinian giants.
megalitica.it...

originally posted by: xuenchen
How did Humanoids miss this size thing? 😁

Humans weren't around that long ago We're talking tens/hundreds of millions of years. Not last week.

originally posted by: ElGoobero
I've noticed that lots of animals had giant predecessors

we had giant wooly elephants & rhinos
giant snake ('titanaboa')
giant beaver (castoreum)
giant sloth
giant cat (sabre tooth)
giant dog (Dire Wolf)
giant whales
of course giant reptiles, esp crocs
giant land birds. oddly, I'm not aware of giant flying birds, unless the pterosours etc count

science is great!

Woolly mammoths and rhinos were smaller than modern elephants and rhinos. And the Blue Whale is the largest animal ever known to have existed.

And homo sapiens helped eliminate some of the larger predators of recent times (smaller canines and cats breed faster and can hide better) - we don't like competitors, especially when they also try and eat us!

originally posted by: xuenchen
How did Humanoids miss this size thing? 😁

We want answers...

When do we want them?

Now!

“There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them" (Genesis 6:4).

Do Neanderthals count as Apes or Man?