It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Millitary vax stats

page: 1
24
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:
+6 more 
posted on Nov, 5 2022 @ 05:09 PM
link   
Clayton has a chat with a lawyer who is going at the military for a class action on behalf of thousands of injured military personnel. It rests on the fact that the approved vaccine was withdrawn the day it was registered and they shot up the military with the unregistered one, which is illegal. The statistics are really bad and have been worked out on the insurance codes for each medical problem which when collated state that the rises in some conditions are in the thousands of percent. When all these are added up and cross-referenced to the civilian workforce it is mind-blowing what has occurred
.,



posted on Nov, 5 2022 @ 05:24 PM
link   
a reply to: anonentity

Tragic, horrific, consequences for some who received certain batches of the C-19 vaccines.



posted on Nov, 5 2022 @ 05:58 PM
link   
If a certain group of people are correct then some batches will cause lethality in 3-5 years, and since the military is so highly vaxxt that could decimate the countries ability to defend itself and then China can just stroll in.



posted on Nov, 5 2022 @ 05:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
If a certain group of people are correct then some batches will cause lethality in 3-5 years


That's not how it works.


+11 more 
posted on Nov, 5 2022 @ 06:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
If a certain group of people are correct then some batches will cause lethality in 3-5 years


That's not how it works.



Yeah, ok, everyone believes you.



posted on Nov, 5 2022 @ 06:52 PM
link   
a reply to: anonentity

military stats for all branches

I think our military did really well and is working cohesively as one force, as they should, particularly as the globe is getting more destabilized. It's good to know we can depend on our military as we always have, that they're healthy and ready to go.

It seems the military did much better than the civilians did during the pandemic, but then again, not a lot of old or disabled people in the military.

One number was interesting to me, scroll down... the military had 449,473 cases and 96 deaths. That's FAR below the national averages.



posted on Nov, 5 2022 @ 07:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Mahogany

There was a handful of whistleblowers from the military Medical sections which were trying to get the word out that the numbers coming out were completely fabricated and that the injuries and deaths and Cancers were thousands of percent above what they were before the vaccination campaign



posted on Nov, 5 2022 @ 07:06 PM
link   
You should call this a attack on the US army.
Treason



posted on Nov, 5 2022 @ 07:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: Mahogany
a reply to: anonentity

military stats for all branches

I think our military did really well and is working cohesively as one force, as they should, particularly as the globe is getting more destabilized. It's good to know we can depend on our military as we always have, that they're healthy and ready to go.

It seems the military did much better than the civilians did during the pandemic, but then again, not a lot of old or disabled people in the military.

One number was interesting to me, scroll down... the military had 449,473 cases and 96 deaths. That's FAR below the national averages.



Thank you ro'b.o,t



posted on Nov, 5 2022 @ 07:08 PM
link   
a reply to: dashen

Claims that would hold up in a court of law?

It's a determining factor... news from youtube videos is fun and all, and it's great to think about what ifs, but ultimately if something can hold up in a court of law determines whether it's real or not.

I believe many of these news that get brought up are nothing more than fabrications themselves. What cancers? What thousands of injuries? Is there real evidence to this? Have people filed lawsuits? Because US attorneys would be all over this; are there case numbers we can reference? There should be thousands.

If the answer is no, then someone's been had.



posted on Nov, 5 2022 @ 07:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: buddha
You should call this a attack on the US army.
Treason

Treason is ok if its done by globalists / leftists.

Remember, the ends justifies the means.



posted on Nov, 5 2022 @ 07:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Mahogany


originally posted by: Silcone Synapse

The DMED database is the DoD's equivalent to VAERS I think.

I am not sure if its availible to the public without an FOIA request,but the attorney presenting the data to Senator johnson has the data which you can read here:

renz-law.com...

I think that is the data as it was before the DMED people decided they had messed up the previous 5 years of data and changed it to make it appear as though there is no steep incline in symptoms/diseases.

It is explained here in the Attorney/lawyers write up of the situation:
renz-law.com... rtility-injuries-across-the-board-after-the-military-was-forced-to/

This short video shows some the discussion between the senator who is attempting to investigate the data,and includes technical medical information from some of the whistleblowers-


It seems to me that it should be investigated by a non biased group of professionals,but in reality are there any non biased profesionals left,or any who are not afraid of being cancelled/fired for going against the narrative?
Time will tell.







posted on Nov, 5 2022 @ 07:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
and then China can just stroll in.


Only if America disarms its citizens.



posted on Nov, 5 2022 @ 07:27 PM
link   
a reply to: v1rtu0s0




If a certain group of people are correct then some batches will cause lethality in 3-5 years


Anything is plausible if you want to ignore that covid causes autoimmune disease. 




and then China can just stroll in.


Unlikely. We really have a mutually beneficial thing going on.
edit on 5 11 2022 by tamusan because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 5 2022 @ 07:39 PM
link   
a reply to: v1rtu0s0


Treason is ok if its done by globalists / leftists.


Which president helped fast track it? My memory is off today.



posted on Nov, 5 2022 @ 08:21 PM
link   
a reply to: CriticalStinker

When the known adverse effect had to be concealed for seventy-five years, along with a mandate to use the stuff on the defense force. Is either an act of gross stupidity or treason.Or a brilliant play depending on what the end game really is, The defense force is the main threat to any power base, They might now all be tagged bagged, and shagged.



posted on Nov, 5 2022 @ 08:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
If a certain group of people are correct then some batches will cause lethality in 3-5 years


That's not how it works.
oh?

How DOES it work?

Because it ain’t working the way they said it would.

Also. We ain’t t there yet mister Dr, PhD, lord guy….




posted on Nov, 5 2022 @ 08:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: v1rtu0s0


Treason is ok if its done by globalists / leftists.


Which president helped fast track it? My memory is off today.
Good point. Should have probably gone through the normal amount of time of testing (a decade give or take), but we “needed” a silver bullet to carry on with life?

I’m not sure there’s a good answer here. In any event we are in the thick of it no matter. I’d assign blame too, but I’m not sure that gets anyone anywhere.

Which one mandated it for everyone except Congress, their staff and the USPS?

Sorry about the whataboutism in advance.



posted on Nov, 5 2022 @ 08:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: buddha
You should call this a attack on the US army.
Treason
I’ll play.

Is the forced administration of an experimental gene therapy on society and it’s healers, protectors, defenders, where we place blame?

If so is that the case. Then is is the WHO, CDC or the current or last administration?

I don’t know. Just food for thought.

I’m still waiting to hear of its origins, and I don’t mean the shot.



posted on Nov, 5 2022 @ 09:47 PM
link   
No it doesn’t.

Facts are never disputed in a court of law.

a reply to: Mahogany


edit on 5-11-2022 by Dalamax because: Succinctness



new topics

top topics



 
24
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join