It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: zosimov
Written when Stephen King was eighteen, The Long Walk was published under King’s pseudonym Richard Bachman over 10 years after it was penned. After revisiting the book, I’d have to say it’s among his best, if not his very best work. His usual bombast is pared down to the bone. There is hardly a sentence, or even a word, to spare. King leaves plenty up to the reader’s interpretation and offers very few hints at what’s to come. Even the end leaves the reader wondering and holds a surprise or two. It’s as dark and psychological as King gets.
There is hardly anything at all to the plot (which I won’t get into here in case someone reading this has yet to read the book), but what the reader does get from it is fascinating. Are we looking at an alternate world in which WWII had different outcomes/events? Was this meant to be a futuristic American society or contemporary under an alternate timeline? What happens to those who’ve been “Squaded”? Did the boys volunteer for the Long Walk, or was there a tv lottery which one could back out of if so inclined? The evidence implies they did apply by choice, but I wondered if the choice part was in the potential to back out/disqualify oneself and if that added to the pressure to go through with it.
The near constant dread/fear of the narrative is palpable, as is the physical stress of the characters. The comedic breaks and camaraderie between the walkers only serves to further the horror of the plot. I couldn’t help but see an allegory for war, in particular the Vietnam War which was in full force at the time of the writing. The spectators were one collective massive character with a personality/psyche of its own. The crowd’s character changes along with the participants of the Long Walk. The only characters we’re given zero insight of are the flinty soldiers. Even the elusive “Major” has more personality and depth than they.
Gore and death runs throughout, for those who gravitate to horror for this, but the psychological depth of this book is what appealed so much to me.
The fact that King wrote this when he was 18/19 and still a freshman in college and life tells me that, no matter how much flack he gets from book snobs (such as myself, just not in this case) Stephen King is a national treasure.
Have you read this Bachman book, and if so, what are your thoughts?
originally posted by: zosimov
a reply to: GENERAL EYES
Misery was my first King book, then It and I was off. I'm happy I read the latter when I was still in elementary school; I used to walk through these huge sewer pipes to get to school, not so much after that.
Agreed that this one (the Long Walk) really stuck with me all these years. Funny how the impact it had on me was even stronger this time around, while a recent re-read of It was the total opposite. I couldn't even make it through after reading 96%. I just got so mad at the long-winded writing, the turtle, and the kid orgy I quit at about pg 900