It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Russia unleashes missile barrage on cities across Ukraine

page: 5
21
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 10 2022 @ 10:20 AM
link   
a reply to: CriticalStinker



That’s why a complete absence of the west would be ideal.


If the Ukrainian fell quickly. That would probably have emboldened Putin to invade a NATO country like Poland. Then what do you think would have happened….



posted on Oct, 10 2022 @ 10:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: WhatItIs
a reply to: CriticalStinker



That’s why a complete absence of the west would be ideal.


If the Ukrainian fell quickly. That would probably have emboldened Putin to invade a NATO country like Poland. Then what do you think would have happened….



I imagine if they invaded a NATO country they’d learn the difference between indirect support and a multi front war rather quickly. I would note I’m not as worried as many when it comes to a nuclear outcome.

Let’s hope we don’t need to learn the outcomes of any of those scenarios though.



posted on Oct, 10 2022 @ 11:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: Echo007
Let me break out the world smallest violin for Ukraine. This is just the start of Russia taking the gloves off.


But, but, but. Lol.



posted on Oct, 10 2022 @ 11:39 AM
link   
According to the usual circle jerkers in these threads russia had run out of missiles.

Looks like they have plenty.



posted on Oct, 10 2022 @ 11:45 AM
link   
a reply to: Nexttimemaybe

To use on civilians, including hitting a children's playground?

Does that float your boat?

So, it's not OK for Ukraine to target a strategic bridge but it's OK for Russia to target civilians?



posted on Oct, 10 2022 @ 11:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: midicon

originally posted by: Soloprotocol
The only way to settle this war is for Zelenski, Putin, and all the other aggressors and aggregators in governments worldwide to get into a giant octagon, Each armed with a home made shank of their choosing. The winner takes all.

Pay per view with the proceeds going to those who have suffered globally in all pointless conflicts.

I don't know who would win, Don't particularly care either, but I would sure tune in and gladly pay £1000 for the event.

Maybe after the bloodbath, our future elected leaders might think twice about starting their pish.


Is Biden going in?

They are all going in.



posted on Oct, 10 2022 @ 12:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kenzo
a reply to: Tarantula777


Iron dome would help , West should send them now all systems more quickly, like yesterday .

Nasaams, Iris-T , and Shorad Aspide air defense system from Spain...




Better yet. Why don't you get off your fat @$$ and go over there and die for what you believe in if you are so pro-war. It's people like you that helped escalate it to this point with your misguided BS.

Now you get to watch as Ukraine is obliterated...



posted on Oct, 10 2022 @ 12:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Nexttimemaybe

To use on civilians, including hitting a children's playground?

Does that float your boat?

So, it's not OK for Ukraine to target a strategic bridge but it's OK for Russia to target civilians?


Here's one now, thanks for showing up.

City's are littered with play areas, some are bound to get accidentally hit. No kids there.

Out of all the missiles fired only 14 reported deaths.

That's some pretty good aiming in my opinion.



posted on Oct, 10 2022 @ 12:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: WhatItIs
a reply to: CriticalStinker



That’s why a complete absence of the west would be ideal.


If the Ukrainian fell quickly. That would probably have emboldened Putin to invade a NATO country like Poland. Then what do you think would have happened….



they probably will anyway eventually, they already invaded georgia and before that chechnya, almost forgot about kazakhastan being occupied too, putin is just following the Soviet playbook, it wont end until all former Soviet republics are annexed back under Russian control, even after putin is gone.
edit on 10-10-2022 by namehere because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 10 2022 @ 12:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Oldcarpy2




To use on civilians, including hitting a children's playground?

You have no issues when the US/NATO does that same in other countries.


Going after civilians.

Even worse during the Balkan wars in the 90s.
The US/NATO used depleted uranium shelling on its missiles and bombs.

The affects of that depleted uranium are still hurting Serbia today in the capital. Children/youth that are born in the capital have many medical conditions.


Serbia isnt the only nation. The US had no problems going after civilians in Iraq or Libya for that matter.



posted on Oct, 10 2022 @ 12:10 PM
link   
a reply to: namehere




putin is just following the Soviet playbook

This nonsense again.
If Putin wanted to he rebirth of the USSR it would already happened years ago.



posted on Oct, 10 2022 @ 12:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Nexttimemaybe

"Here's one" what?

What legitimate targets were they aiming at?



posted on Oct, 10 2022 @ 12:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Nexttimemaybe

To use on civilians, including hitting a children's playground?

Does that float your boat?

So, it's not OK for Ukraine to target a strategic bridge but it's OK for Russia to target civilians?

Our resident NAFO member...

So no coffee today I assume?



posted on Oct, 10 2022 @ 12:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: Nexttimemaybe
According to the usual circle jerkers in these threads russia had run out of missiles.

Looks like they have plenty.

Russia has plenty of resources in their own nation. Its why there are some in the US that want to breakup Russia and steal those same resources.

Its not going to work the way they imagine and fantasize.



posted on Oct, 10 2022 @ 12:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Oldcarpy2




So, it's not OK for Ukraine to target a strategic bridge

Its ok for Ukraine to bomb, attack innocent civilians and civilian targets in separatist provinces is it now?



posted on Oct, 10 2022 @ 12:13 PM
link   
a reply to: vNex92

You're forgetting the genocide thing.

Since when did two wrongs make a right, anyway?

We are talking about the current war in Ukraine here, not your deflections.
edit on 10-10-2022 by Oldcarpy2 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 10 2022 @ 12:15 PM
link   
a reply to: JAY1980

Grow up.

Do try to stay on topic.



posted on Oct, 10 2022 @ 12:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Is Putin angry again?

Cheers



posted on Oct, 10 2022 @ 12:18 PM
link   
a reply to: F2d5thCavv2

Frothing at the mouth and biting the carpet, probably.

And punched a horse.



posted on Oct, 10 2022 @ 12:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: JAY1980

originally posted by: Kenzo
a reply to: Tarantula777


Iron dome would help , West should send them now all systems more quickly, like yesterday .

Nasaams, Iris-T , and Shorad Aspide air defense system from Spain...




Better yet. Why don't you get off your fat @$$ and go over there and die for what you believe in if you are so pro-war. It's people like you that helped escalate it to this point with your misguided BS.

Now you get to watch as Ukraine is obliterated...


What clear military targets is Putin after? You can just be a civilian and get killed. I bet they are not pro war….




top topics



 
21
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join