Abortions - Why so bad?

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: loam
Nothing screams white supremacy more than a public policy that encourages minorities to abort their babies.

SOURCE?

LINK?

Not from an anti-abortion site.

Not from an OP.

Why? What difference would it make to you?

CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR)- Abortion Surveillance — United States, 2019

Non-Hispanic White women had the lowest abortion rate (6.6 abortions per 1,000 women) and ratio (117 abortions per 1,000 live births), and non-Hispanic Black women had the highest abortion rate (23.8 abortions per 1,000 women) and ratio (386 abortions per 1,000 live births).

Since your crowd is so "outcome based" when finding evidence of institutional racism, seems pretty clear to me. Moreover, these folks seem to have bought the agenda hook, line, and sinker.

a reply to: loam

Black women had the highest abortion rate

Sounds like a case for Critical Race Theory!

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: loam

Black women had the highest abortion rate

Sounds like a case for Critical Race Theory!

I'm not sure how those CDC statistics relate to the post in reference.

Nothing screams white supremacy more than a public policy that encourages minorities to abort their babies.

a reply to: Annee

So abortion isn't an extreme measure in your opinion?

"What you up to today sweetheart"

"Nothing much, taking the dog for a walk, maybe pop to the shops and then to the clinic to terminate my pregnancy"

a reply to: Annee

Of course you wouldn't.

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: Annee

Of course you wouldn't.

You're right.

a reply to: Annee

To each his own, I suppose- even if it hurts an entire class of people, huh?

You should be so proud.

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: Annee

To each his own, I suppose- even if it hurts an entire class of people, huh?

You should be so proud.

You seem to be interpreting statistics to mean something it doesn't say.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: Annee

To each his own, I suppose- even if it hurts an entire class of people, huh?

You should be so proud.

You seem to be interpreting statistics to mean something it doesn't say.

You seem to be interpreting statistics to mean something you want it not to say.

But that's understandable when all of your public policy positions weaken the American black family and encourage them to abort their babies en mass by calling it 'health-care'.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Blaine91555
a reply to: Annee

You should not look harshly at people who view it as murder, because you are literally asking them to say murder is OK. That's why it's a bubblegum argument, chewing the same old piece of gum over and over until it has no flavor.

I am Pro-Life but I'm rational. It should not be political and to be frank, everyone should be angry at both parties' leaders for using it to divide to control us.

I doubt I'll ever post again on this topic in my life as it's pointless and I'll leave it to those who like the never-ending back and forth.

Thanks for the conversation folks.

Many pro-life people (both men & women) still support RIGHT OF CHOICE.

They know what is wrong for them -- but also know they have no business deciding what's right for someone else.

Forcing legislature to deny my Right of Choice -- is where it crosses the line.

Again, it's NOT about choice.
In 99% of abortion cases, the choice WAS FREELY made to try and reproduce.
It is not the "right to choose" you want.
It is the right to another human beings life you want.

a reply to: Quadrivium

It is the right to another human beings life you want.

It is a woman's choice as to whether or not she is willing to give her body over, to be the source of that life and its very survival.

You want to make sure she doesn't have that choice, that she's a victim to her biology. But she isn't. She has choices, even if people like you make her choice illegal, dangerous and life threatening.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

She could choose to not have sex or use one of the readily available and effective contraceptive choices.

a reply to: Grenade

And of course, ONCE AGAIN, no mention being made about a man's use or responsibility when it comes to contraception.

All of the burden on the woman.

Seems to be a consistent trend on this site.

I thought it took two to tango?

Why do the men get a free pass on this issue?

a reply to: GENERAL EYES

I was replying to a post which was about a womans choice.

Personally i always use my own contraception with a new partner.

Always putting it onto the men? You see how this works?

Men have no choice in the abortion process and if a woman wants to protect her body maybe she should take responsibility for it.

a reply to: Grenade

Once again, pushing the onus back onto the shoulders of the woman.

I'm glad you practice contraception, both partners should.

It doubles the chance of preventing conception.

But then you went right back to how the woman has to be the one to "take care of herself", but apparently only in the manner you see fit.

a reply to: GENERAL EYES

I was replying to a poster who was referring to a WOMANS choice! A post by a woman. Ask her why she didn't reference men!

Deflections, deflections and more deflections. That's what this thread consists of by the pro-choice crowd.

Unborn children are just that, small human beings at the start of the developmental process. If you support abortion then you're supporting infanticide, it's really that simple and those who resort to this crap know it. Kill children on your own time, don't however suggest men have any say in the matter, we're not the one making the decision to kill anyone!

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: Sookiechacha

She could choose to not have sex or use one of the readily available and effective contraceptive choices.

Sure. But those aren't her only choices.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

I meant should not could.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: Sookiechacha

I meant should not could.

Feel free to introduce me to all those celibate men in the world -- but I am not going to stop having sex.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: Sookiechacha

I meant should not could.

What "should" have the man opted to do?

You know, a woman is only fertile for a couple of days a month. But every time a guy pulls that thing out and points it at a young lady, it's loaded!