Forget Drag Shows: Now We Have Strippers For Kids And That Is OK

a reply to: Peeple

No. Nudity doesn't freak me out.

a reply to: ConcernedCanadian

Good for you.
Alas that wasn't my question.

All I know is that Trump bad.


Other than that everything else is OK.

a reply to: Peeple

I wasn't interested anyway if it's any consolation.

a reply to: ConcernedCanadian

I bet you're super prude and in charge at your environment.

Despising this is not being prude it's having a functioning set of morals and an intrinsic knowledge what is right and wrong when it's about kids and touched groins.

a reply to: TDDAgain

That's not why I called him that, if you go back to read his comment.

originally posted by: ConcernedCanadian
a reply to: infolurker

I saw strippers of both sexes when I was underage and survived the experience. Fun. Fun. Fun. And I didn't consider the dancers child abusers. They were just naked.

a reply to: Peeple

Oh, did you mistake that last post as an invitation to chat? See how wrong you always are? Savour the moment. It's our last together

a reply to: Peeple

I know what you did and I was not replying or speaking to you. I made a general comment in this thread. We had our fair share of arguments that I vividly remember and I don't argue with you at all especially not when you have one of your episodes.

I was not even checking the 2nd page.

a reply to: TDDAgain

& a reply to: ConcernedCanadian

But I get the last word.
And that's chill

a reply to: Peeple

Did I not tell you to bang your tambourine at someone else. I wasn't raised in a convent as a child. Go be hysterical at someone else. I liked looking at porn when I was too young to buy it too. Calm down.

a reply to: Peeple

Sure, have your nonsensical last word while the adults discuss this matter.


Seriously... it's pure coincidence I used the word prude, get over it already.

a reply to: ConcernedCanadian

I am not judging. There's really no need to get that defensive.
I'm just curious.

a reply to: TDDAgain

Oh please.
Because adults like you hold grudges for eternity?
Get over it indeed.

a reply to: Peeple

You accused me of raping my dog.

I think that sticks forever.

a reply to: TDDAgain

It's just what it is.
It's not why you personally as big exception own a dog. Most people have a dog because they long for a living companion who has to obey.
That's the norm.
I'm just advocating that there are certain things people do to all animals that are unnecessarily aggressive.
And throwing your dog on the back is one of them.

a reply to: Peeple
Laying a dog on it's back is what dogs themselves to and you equated it to a sexual act what I picked up as projection from your side.

I will stop now, I don't argue with crazy, have your last word.

a reply to: TDDAgain

Freud.

I don't think there is enough napalm to fix this problem.

You people really need to get a grip on reality and think before you speak. And I mean all of you.

In no way shape or form is it alright to expose young children to anything sexual in any context. Forcing them to try to understand concepts beyond their capability is just plain wrong. It stresses them on subject matter they don't need to be exposed to at that age.

If a younger person sneaks a peak at adult content, that is curiosity. If an adult authority figure introduces a young person, especially a young child, to adult content that is completely different. When an adult authority figure does it, the child is led to believe that content as acceptable for them. It is the main modus operandi of groomers. First, the subject matter is introduced and normalized, the children believe they are doing the right thing and, like most children, want to please their authority figures whether they are parents, teachers, administrators, whatever. The children, naturally curious, are encouraged to ask questions and "get involved".

This plays on the trust a child has for the adults in their lives. And that is what makes this so sickening.

Taking advantage of a childs trust...there is a special place in hell for you...