Putin . Why would I blow up my own pipeline

a reply to: midicon

No. Because views are currency.

I don't give that away

a reply to: Butterfinger


Now he say it

Putin calls 'sabotage' against Nord Stream an 'act of international terrorism' -Kremlin


The narrative is unfolding .

Why did 911 happen?


Why has the fbi given explosives to terrorists?


a reply to: anonentity

originally posted by: lotusaugen
a reply to: anonentity

To stay on topic:

Putler: " I blow my "own" pipeline" and then I blame others have done that"

Its easy to understand. Isn't it?
It fits the false narrative perfectly.

Why would he blow up something he could just turn off to use as leverage? Blowing it up destroys the leverage.


Also how did the US not detect a sub or ship in that area at the time? They monitor EVERYTHING.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: lotusaugen
a reply to: anonentity

To stay on topic:

Putler: " I blow my "own" pipeline" and then I blame others have done that"

Its easy to understand. Isn't it?
It fits the false narrative perfectly.

Why would he blow up something he could just turn off to use as leverage? Blowing it up destroys the leverage.


Also how did the US not detect a sub or ship in that area at the time? They monitor EVERYTHING.

You think the US is the only one to use “false flag” operations? Did Russia detect a sub or anything?

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Gas prices up 8pc after three leaks in Nord Stream pipelines in one day
Faults raise fears of potential escalation in energy war between Russia and Europe

www.telegraph.co.uk...

a reply to: Kenzo

You can't not not fight terrorism, can you?
# it was Poland...
lol
To some extent I think I can sympathise.

a reply to: Kenzo

You are quite correct the narrative is unfolding. In the Donbas, if Ukraine attacks it will be considered an act of terrorism by a terrorist regime. Legally they can blow Kyiv up if they can. Anyone who aids and helps terrorists get the same treatment. The conflict has changed. Now if they blame Russia they might be right.

Jimmy knows what's up!! 👍👌

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: lotusaugen
a reply to: anonentity

To stay on topic:

Putler: " I blow my "own" pipeline" and then I blame others have done that"
.

Why would he blow up something he could just turn off to use as leverage? Blowing it up destroys the leverage.


Also how did the US not detect a sub or ship in that area at the time? They monitor EVERYTHING.

"Putin . Why would I blow up my own pipeline?"


A tantrum because Europe is laughing at absurd russian demands and refuses to purchase russian gas at any price?

An effort to make putin's recent nuke bluff more believable so putin gets his way?

An effort to 'salt the fields' in a tantrum over realizing that russia is about to lose a war it started in Baghdad Bob style?

He plans on invading Europe next and wants to weaken them first?

Anger over the new Baltic Pipeline?

Trying to separate Europe and the US by convincing Europe that the US did it?

Need more?





It isn't 'leverage' when the other party doesn't want anything to do with your country as a result of another European invasion.





We don't know what evidence the US detected yet, but I suspect that we have some.

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: Kenzo

You are quite correct the narrative is unfolding. In the Donbas, if Ukraine attacks it will be considered an act of terrorism by a terrorist regime. Legally they can blow Kyiv up if they can. Anyone who aids and helps terrorists get the same treatment. The conflict has changed. Now if they blame Russia they might be right.

Yeah, that scam really has the world fooled and frightened!

Have any more good ones?

originally posted by: Joneselius
Except Joe Biden is on film, expressly stating that Nordstream 2 will not be allowed to operate. At all.... But yeah......

If Putin wanted to, he could've just turned the spigot off. He didnt need to blow it up, costing his country even more economic misery.reply to: lotusaugen

He is losing faith with the Russian people, so now he has something to say "we been directly attacked!" . The why also goes the other way in why would we blow it up when it is already turned off.

a reply to: MidnightWatcher

Nope, but if you look at the overall picture, To bring in a world government that everyone will go along with, things would have to get really a lot rougher than they are now. Western currencies are hanging in there on hope. There is not a lot of economic activity to back the currencies in the foreseeable future. A limited war would just about do it. People are going to freeze to death this winter in Europe, and a pipeline gets blown up! Russian fertilizer suddenly gets switched off, along with the gas to keep the Dutch greenhouses going, Governments are using the Green policy to destroy the dutch farmers. Who literally feeds Europe? Along with all this Russia is goaded and goaded into taking parts of Russian-speaking Ukraine. Come on this is a total setup. You think that people that go to the Bolshoi ballet together and call each other by first names are going to kill each other. It's a total sham like the news we get fed and the rest of the BS. It probably won't work like all the other BS but idiots will still line up for the Jab and go and kill other people who they would have been sharing a beer with a few years back.

Ukraine and Poland both have pipelines from Russia going across their countries, so they are the main beneficiaries from Nordstream being broken. I think Ukraine asked Poland to blow the two lines up and Poland said fine, nobody will believe that we can do it. and then we can all blame Russia. Brilliant.

a reply to: anonentity




"a world government that everyone will go along with"


It is not possible in the lifetime of anyone here, or their children.

That doom porn is hilarious-









But thanks for all that russian propaganda again, Europe is nowhere near 'freezing' this winter as russia had hoped.

Western currencies are doing just fine, while russia has been exhausting what's left of it's reserves by being the 'buyer of last resort' for rubles to prop up it's 'value'.

a reply to: MidnightWatcher

No one will know the truth till it hits them in the face. The problem here is that since people have to pay for their utilities, how will they do that without a job? They can't afford rent.

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: MidnightWatcher

No one will know the truth till it hits them in the face. The problem here is that since people have to pay for their utilities, how will they do that without a job? They can't afford rent.

Sure, russia succeeded in raising Europe's energy costs, but Europe knew that was coming the day they started using the first pipeline.

Elections have consequences, too late now.

a reply to: Freeborn

Just remember the same time that it was blown up there was another pipeline that took it's place and is set to 'finish' being built, and all you have to do is dig into who owns that pipeline and you pretty much got your answer.. Granted, biden did threaten the pipeline. So there's a big chance it was him, and that financial markets are just trying to redirect attention to that other pipeline.

(at least that's their excuse is another pipeline was being built so it could of been an 'accident'. But, that's what they are telling money.. Live, but behind the scenes wth knows anymore)

a reply to: BlackArrow


Or perhaps that's what the perpetrator wanted everyone to think?

We need evidence.

a reply to: MidnightWatcher

They do not want Russia doing anything because it will cost the big boys heaps in interest payments. The CIA is basically a business enabler to get countries into debt and hence the cost of sovereignty. It's all BS to keep the big boys rich. They have invested so much money in Ukraine that they will never leave it alone. www.bitchute.com... I guess that's the way the world has always worked. But let's not be naive about it. If you want to earn big bucks do what you think is best.