Dr. Anthony Fauci Admits He Knew Our Children Would Be Hurt by His Draconian Covid-19 Actions.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: thethinkingman

According to Trump the primary reason to vax kids was to stop them being carriers, not to stop them being sick themselves.

What is the current justification for it now that we know that Trump's information was based on lies about vaccine efficacy and prevention of transmission?

You keep posting this old debunked excuse because you can come up with no scientific justification.

Imagine an anti-Trump sycophant being reduced to using his debunked statements as a substitute for scientific data and logic. That's some desperation.

originally posted by: Ksihkehe

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: thethinkingman

According to Trump the primary reason to vax kids was to stop them being carriers, not to stop them being sick themselves.

What is the current justification for it now that we know that Trump's information was based on lies about vaccine efficacy and prevention of transmission?

You keep posting this old debunked excuse because you can come up with no scientific justification.

Imagine an anti-Trump sycophant being reduced to using his debunked statements as a substitute for scientific data and logic. That's some desperation.

We always knew that the vax would REDUCE transmission to about 85 percent, not prevent it 100 percent. If you'd listened to the briefing you would know this. The science was in the briefings. But you'd know this if you weren't so anti trump.

The sources in my signature show conclusive proof that the vax reduces both transmission and death, as well as serious sickness. They're from European and Israeli sources and free from US politics.

I'm not making any current justification, because as you well know by now I'm a libertarian and believe that mandates are counterproductive because they get people's backs up.

where I come from the population was vaxxed heavily in 2021, booster are currently only recommended for the elderly and those with comorbidity, and covid is just the flu now for most people.

No mandates, masks are voluntary 99 percent of the time and almost nobody has worn one since 2021.

This is because we did not politicise covid, and we just go on with what was necessary. You dithered and quarreled, and your still where we were in 2020.

a reply to: musicismagic

Fauci broke the number one rule, which is "Never # on your own doorstep" He used to do it in far away places with strange sounding names untill he didn't. Same goes for Gates, they are really stuffed now.

a reply to: anonentity

Gates?

As a natural born citizen who built a business from nothing to become one of the world's richest men, I think he's earned the right to way in on American affairs.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

We always knew that the vax would REDUCE transmission to about 85 percent, not prevent it 100 percent.

you need to watch this!!
twitter.com...

edit on 23-9-2022 by fringeofthefringe because: (no reason given)

edit on 23-9-2022 by fringeofthefringe because: (no reason given)

a reply to: fringeofthefringe

Covid is a respitory infection which means that you can have trace amounts of it in the mucus in your airways even if you aren't actually infected with the virus in the sense that undergoing viral replication in your body.

This means that a fully vaxxed person has a small chance of transmitting the virus through exhaled droplets even if the aren't sick with covid themselves.

The chances are significantly lower than for an unvaxxed person who doesn't have natural immunity through a previous infection because there is far less covid involved, and because covid in mucus travels slower and a shorter distance than Covid expelled directly from the lungs or upper tracts.

All of which you should know as it was in Trump's whitehouse Broadcasts.

But I guess some people hate his science as much as they hate his politics or his success.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

So you carrying water for these psycho clowns now??

"We always knew" WE didn't know jack #. IF you were paying attention, you would have seen that all the heads at the CDC, and NIH, and WHO were spouting off about stopping transmission and arresting illness if you were vaxxed. They lied, and lied, and lied, and lied to cover their lies, and now it's just "we won't mention our lies and hope no one notices."

THEY didn't know #. They were saying what they said to convince a terrified public that their only way to not die from Covid was to get the shots.

There was no science in their claims at all. Just lies.

originally posted by: MaxxAction
a reply to: AaarghZombies

So you carrying water for these psycho clowns now??

"We always knew" WE didn't know jack #. IF you were paying attention, you would have seen that all the heads at the CDC, and NIH, and WHO were spouting off about stopping transmission and arresting illness if you were vaxxed. They lied, and lied, and lied, and lied to cover their lies, and now it's just "we won't mention our lies and hope no one notices."

THEY didn't know #. They were saying what they said to convince a terrified public that their only way to not die from Covid was to get the shots.

There was no science in their claims at all. Just lies.

This information was in the live whitehouse broadcasts that Trump made. You didn't know about it because rather than watching the elected leader of the free world telling us that covid was just a bad flu with a mortality rate of 1.3 percent unless you had comorbidity, and that the vax was 86 percent effective two weeks after the first shot, you sat in some echo chamber forum that just memed soundbytes about how wearing a mask would give kids CO2 poisoning.

The things that I'm talking about were common knowledge broadcast to the world by Trump.

Except it isnt 86% effective or 95% effective, its actually less than 1% effective based on pfizers own trial.

The number is derived from the results of 43'000 people split into 2 groups and out of all those people less than 1% of the entire trial tested positive. So 170 people tested positive out of 43'000, 162 unvaccinated tested positive and 8 vaccinated tested positive....they then say this difference is 95%.

Except thats relative risk reduction, not absolute risk reduction which is less than 1%

And everyone was not tested as mandatory. Someone in the trial judges whether you should be tested based on symptoms, so they disregarded "asymptomic" infection even in the trial....

So based on 170 people.....thats enough to say yup BILLIONS OF PEOPLE, this is 95% effective!!! total lies. Totally insane. If the numbers who tested positive changed even slightly due to this tiny portion of people, the 95% number would dramatically change.

And infact if you had all previously infected people compared to vaccinated, the vaccine would then have a 0% efficacy because basically nobody previously infected would test positive. Well of course taking into account the inaccurate nature of the testing.

What benefits of BNT162b2 have been shown in studies? BNT162b2 has been studied in approximately 43,000 individuals 16 years of age and older who were equally allocated to the vaccine or a placebo. Those who received vaccination with BNT162b2 had a reduction in the rate of COVID-19 illness compared to those who received placebo (8 cases of COVID-19 illness in the vaccinated group compared to 162 cases in the placebo group). These results were observed 7 days following the second dose in study participants with no evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection.

whoaaaa there

Covid-19 vaccine trials cannot tell us if they will save lives

Vaccines are being hailed as the solution to the covid-19 pandemic, but the vaccine trials currently underway are not designed to tell us if they will save lives, reports Peter Doshi, Associate Editor at The BMJ today.

Several covid-19 vaccine trials are now in their most advanced (phase 3) stage, but what will it mean exactly when a vaccine is declared “effective”?

Many may assume that successful phase 3 studies will mean we have a proven way of keeping people from getting very sick and dying from covid-19. And a robust way to interrupt viral transmission.

Yet the current phase 3 trials are not actually set up to prove either, says Doshi. “None of the trials currently underway are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospitalisations, intensive care use, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus,” he writes.

He explains that all ongoing phase 3 trials for which details have been released are evaluating mild, not severe, disease - and they will be able to report final results once around 150 participants develop symptoms.

In Pfizer and Moderna’s trials, for example, individuals with only a cough and positive lab test would bring those trials one event closer to their completion.

Yet Doshi argues that vaccine manufacturers have done little to dispel the notion that severe covid-19 was what was being assessed. Moderna, for example, called hospitalisations a “key secondary endpoint” in statements to the media.

But Tal Zaks, Chief Medical Officer at Moderna, told The BMJ that their trial lacks adequate statistical power to assess that endpoint.

Part of the reason may be numbers, says Doshi. Because most people with symptomatic covid-19 infections experience only mild symptoms, even trials involving 30,000 or more patients would turn up relatively few cases of severe disease.

“Hospitalisations and deaths from covid-19 are simply too uncommon in the population being studied for an effective vaccine to demonstrate statistically significant differences in a trial of 30,000 people,” he adds. “The same is true regarding whether it can save lives or prevent transmission: the trials are not designed to find out.”

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL

Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial

www.youtube.com...

a reply to: AaarghZombies

So you're also a psychic?

Seldom have I met a person with such superior abilities as yours that they can, through 4 or 5 interactions on a random forum, know EVERYTHING about the people they're interacting with. Hell, you could make a living off this if you set your mind to it.

Since you have no idea what you're talking about, let me see if I can school you a little bit on who you're talking to. I was worried about this virus becoming the next 1918 pandemic when I first started hearing about it in October of 2019, so I did what any smart person should have done, and started studying the nature of Corona viruses, and reading every piece of literature I could on this particular virus. I probably had 40 hours of reading about and studying such things before patient X ever appeared in the USA. I also watched a lot of the pressers early on, although I figured out pretty quickly that there was a direct effort to nay say anything that showed promise as early treatment, so the game had definitely changed. It was no longer an accident or naturally occurring: It became apparent that this was done on purpose.

I also studied, in depth, everything I could get my hands on about natural anti-virals. As a result, when I caught covid in march of 2020, I had been on an anti-viral vitamin and supplement regimen for a couple months, so getting through it was more or less a walk in the park, I came through it with flying colors.

There was a group of researchers in Taiwan that were already breaking this virus down before it ever appeared in the USA, and what they found was quite staggering. The original variant had been designed with the ability to attack the human body through 5 different cellular pathways. Their main accomplishment being the grafted in furyn clevage site which allowed it to bypass the first defenses of the immune system and build up a head of steam before the immune system even knew the body had been breached.

There has never been a naturally occurring virus with such a variable genetic makeup, or such diversity in the ways it could attack the body and propagate itself. It really was a viral engineering marvel. Thank God that nature typically wins when we try to go up against her, and the virus has now become more or less a nuisance instead of the death sentence it was for so many.

I also learned that people, in general, have become weak minded. If you tell people to be afraid, they will. If you tell them to wear masks, they will. If you tell them to get a shot, they will. The majority bought into all the shaming and fear that was emanating from Fauci's demonic mouth, and went on to hate anyone who wasn't as afraid as they were.

I learned that there is MAYBE 10% of those who work in government who deserve the trust of the public. The rest are soulless husks being controlled by greed, corruption, and the desire for power.

I learned that head of health agencies, municipal, state, and federal, were willing to sell out their fellow humans in an effort be with the "cool kids" who knew all about sciency stuff.

I learned that Hospital administrators would sell their souls and allow thousands to die under their roofs by keeping their mouths shut and going along with the accepted "protocols" while doctors and nurses were screaming at the top of their lungs that this protocol was ineffective at best, mass murder at worst.

I learned that they inserted covid sick people in amongst the most vulnerable by executive order so they could make a big "death splash" and continue to keep everyone terrified.

Finally I learned that as soon as the virus appeared, so did the shills. Miraculously, every forum I frequent would have a bunch of new sign ups who weren't talking about whatever the topic of the website is, guns, trucks, rc cars, whatever, but immediately wanted to insult, ridicule, embarrass, and shout out of the conversation anyone who had doubts about the official government narrative.

What I have observed with you is that you are either: A. A paid shill or: B. you are terrified out of your mind that some of the stuff people like me post is true, and this "vaccine" is poison, and you're going to wake up to that reality some day. For your sake, I sincerely hope that doesn't happen. The realization that you have been fooled by those who are supposed to have your best interests at heart, and that may cost you your health would be hard to live with.

a reply to: MaxxAction
Hey man, how dare your question the Zombie. He's got links in his signature line FFS!

a reply to: underpass61

omg he questioned the almighty!? He must have a death wish!

Also people have missed probably THE BIGGEST SCAM of them all......

The reason why they give 2 injections is because 1 injection is below 50% efficacy (r-r-r) even with the ridiculous way of making the numbers..... so they HAVE to do it as 2 shots or it couldnt be passed even under the extremely lax emergency authorisation, which is also fake because there are known treatments and they were KNOWN in 2020.

Antibody production does not equate to much if those antibodies are #ing useless or ....even help the virus infect you more.

Its utter bull# all the way down, the virus mutates constantly, its known that you cant really make effective vaccines for corona viruses, the virus itself basically is not harmful to the majority of people, they already have immunity by the time the vax is available, then its outdated anyway when it comes out. They're constantly comparing "vaxxed" to "uninfected" when 99% of the world has probably been infected....it costs BILLIONS..... The list goes on and on and on.

Its very very very dangerous.

Its dangerous to interfere with peoples immune profiles, to direct their immune system to look for things that arent there. To insert novel proteins and not even test what they do. To Insert novel mrna, the platform itself open the door to basically unlimited genetic influence.

Its completely insane.

a reply to: MaxxAction

Zombies job is to downplay all negative reports with regards to the vax for as long as possible. The longer they can do this the longer the scam lasts. They will be here for a lot longer because everyone who has had it wants the reassurance that the negative science is not true. Then when convinced will probably have the booster. When this is over they will move on to climate change deniers.
Vaccines are the biggest scam and money maker ever invented, they make so much money that they can lobby the government agencies as a standing business model that works well. Health is a secondary consideration. www.bitchute.com...

Former Pharmaceutical Rep Details How Oxycontin Took Over

Another example of governmental and pharmaceutical corruption. The corruption is crystal clear.

www.youtube.com...

a reply to: MaxxAction

In other words, you read a whole bunch of inaccurate information on an echo chamber doom porn website, and you brought some snake oil that didn't actually help.

Seldom have I met a person with such superior abilities as yours that they can, through 4 or 5 interactions on a random forum, know EVERYTHING about the people they're interacting with.

You mean that I googled them and looked at their past Twitter posts?

I was worried about this virus becoming the next 1918 pandemic when I first started hearing about it in October of 2019,

Whereas I knew that it would be a bad case of the flu from the start, unless you have co-morbidity, because it's a Crona virus, something that's well known.

There has never been a naturally occurring virus with such a variable genetic makeup, or such diversity in the ways it could attack the body and propagate itself.

Other than SARS and MERS, both of which actually have a higher mortality rate than Covid.

also studied, in depth, everything I could get my hands on about natural anti-virals. As a result, when I caught covid in march of 2020, I had been on an anti-viral vitamin and supplement regimen for a couple months, so getting through it was more or less a walk in the park, I came through it with flying colors.

As did most of the other people who didn't do any of that, but happened to be under 50 and in reasonably good shape. On the grounds, as people here have been saying since the start, Covid is really just a bad version of the flu.

l. If you tell them to wear masks, they will. If you tell them to get a shot, they will.

The will do this because it's just plain common sense.

I learned that as soon as the virus appeared, so did the shills.

You mean the people flogging doom porn on website filled with associate links to herbal remedies?

What I have observed with you is that you are either: A. A paid shill or: B. you are terrified out of your mind that some of the stuff people like me post is true, and this "vaccine" is poison, and you're going to wake up to that reality some day.

Alternatively, I actually know what I'm talking about and am simply giving people good advice based on the science, in order to debunk the doom porn.

It's 2022, vaxxing started in late 2020. We're not knee deep in dead yet, but covid rates are down.

Let's look at this with the benefit of hindsight. Just look at all of the doom porn that's come and gone.

Protein shedding
magnetic people
Graphene nano-particles
Weird clots
Spontaneous miscarriages
Bluetooth connectivity
Crystals that form when near wifi signals
Everything related to 5G
And all of the rest

Everything has been debunked

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: MaxxAction

Zombies job is to downplay all negative reports with regards to the vax for as long as possible. The longer they can do this the longer the scam lasts. They will be here for a lot longer because everyone who has had it wants the reassurance that the negative science is not true. Then when convinced will probably have the booster. When this is over they will move on to climate change deniers.
Vaccines are the biggest scam and money maker ever invented, they make so much money that they can lobby the government agencies as a standing business model that works well. Health is a secondary consideration. www.bitchute.com...

The flaw in your plan is that I've been pretty clear that I'm a libertarian and that I oppose vax mandates. So, I'm apparently downplaying the risks of a vax while at the same time saying that people shouldn't be forced to get it?

I've also been pretty open about saying that covid only has a mortality rate of about 1.3 percent, and is only really dangerous to the elderly and those with comorbidity. So I'm apparently pushing people to get a vaxxine for a virus that I'm publicly saying isn't going to kill most of the people who catch it?

Oh, and you forget that I'm also a sucker when it comes to things that would make me rich and famous. IF I had proof that the vax was dangerous I could practically print money with it. I could publish a couple of papers, write a couple of books, and then pretty much retire. I'd just need to do a couple of speaking tours a year to keep the money coming in, and I'd be set for life.

I'd wager that if I were the person who broke the scandal I could do a speaking event and that you personal might even pay to come see me, not realizing that it was me.

There's no money to be made in saying that the vax is safe. People on government salaries are already doing that, and nobody will pay for a Patreon subscription to hear somebody saying the same things as they do.

On the other hand, people WILL pay for doom porn.

originally posted by: ColeYounger
a reply to: carewemust

When Fauci retires, Rand Paul will be gunning for him.

to bad trump didn't get rid of dr Fauxi when he had the chance along with the rest of his swamp filled cabinet. we just might have avoided the tyrant jabs and biden all together.

unfortunately the swamp is good at protecting the swamp and despite me liking rand and especially his dad ron, nothing but rhetoric and sound bites with harsh zingers and he ownd fauxi utube videos will come from this

a reply to: thethinkingman

Its very very very dangerous.

It's less dangerous than Covid, which instructs your body to produce the entire virus. The vax only instructs it to produce a single component of the virus.

Its dangerous to interfere with peoples immune profiles, to direct their immune system to look for things that arent there.

You're not interfering it, you're teaching it a new trick, and it's a basic part of how vaxes do what they do.

To Insert novel mrna, the platform itself open the door to basically unlimited genetic influence.

Not really, the vax uses mRNA, which operates in the outer regions of a cell, it can't penetrate the nucleolus so it can only delivery instructions, not make actual changes.

The reason why they give 2 injections is because 1 injection is below 50% efficacy

It's actually just over 50 percent, not under 50 percent but that's splitting hairs.

It's public knowledge, and confirmed by peer review science, that the reason that you have two shots is because having two shots is more effective than having one Link, as having two shots boosts you to over 85 percent.

This isn't unusual. Lots of vaxes have two shots, or one shot followed by a booster within the same year.

It's not controversial or secret. It's something that's explained to most new mothers when their kids get vaxxed for other things. It was also in Trump's whitehouse briefings. So it was explained to the nation on live TV and given presidential approval.