truss: [verb] to secure tightly

www.merriam-webster.com...

So, almost want to take bets
Who is going to be worse, Truss or Biden
Congratulations to Great Britain on their newest Prime Minister
Feel free to vent

originally posted by: Raggedyman
www.merriam-webster.com...

So, almost want to take bets
Who is going to be worse, Truss or Biden
Congratulations to Great Britain on their newest Prime Minister
Feel free to vent

You need to watch and see if she drinks Chinese tea

1) In public does someone have to hold her hand on the way to the podium so she doesn't wander off?

2) Can you understand her speeches, or is it a garbled world salad?

3) Does she fart loudly in the company of high ranking dignitaries?

4) Does she wear a diaper?

5) Can she board or disembark an airplane without falling down?

6) Can she ride a bicycle without tipping over?

a reply to: nugget1

Garbled
Walks off the wrong way
Not sure she can ride a bike
Two off the bat, not sure on her bowel control

This is NOT the Mud Pit!!!

All rules for POLITE political debate will be enforced.
Members must also Stay on Topic!!!



Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (REVISED)





You are responsible for your own posts.....those who ignore that responsibility will face mod actions.


and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!

Liz Truss being Prime Minister is like when Apple made everyone have that U2 album they didn’t want in their iTunes library

I do not vote Tory and I certainly would not have voted for this lady to be prime minister.

She was once a member of the Liberal Democrats and called for an end to the Monarchy in an impassioned speech.

This was when she was 19 and though she seemed at the time to have some fair priority's BUT given how she eventually defected to the Conservative party how trustworthy was she and was she just playing the audience.

And how trustworthy does that make her?.



Personally I think the Monarchy are an important British institution although I lament the fact we will soon have a man whom put his children into plant pots and cheated on his beautiful and gentle hearted wife as head of state but still I do not want to end the Monarchy just for it to be reformed.
(Ethically I am a Christian so do not see the Monarchy as MY Liege Lords but as simply a useful - sometimes but not the likes of Andrew etc - institution rather my Liege is the King himself and that is Christ but as a British citizen I think I am right in saying better the system you know despite it's flaws than some corrupt president of a republic that we don't know).

I am not a conservative and think this lady is NOT what she seems, how will we fund public services if she turns our nation into a TAX HAVEN for the rich?.

Already many conservative MP's are fearing the fact they are going to almost absolutely definitely be out of power at the next general election.

And she is planning to strip yet more power from the people by outlawing peoples right to go on strike.

Has suggested that Patients should be forced to pay a fee just to see there own general practitioner AND want's to cut NHS wages even further according to some past statements from about ten or so years ago.

Now let's look at the tactics behind this plan to charge patients to see there GP, it is about forcing the sick to DIE, the poorest that is, forcing them to be unable to SEE A DOCTOR and so denying them any help in the form of financial support from the government.

A former Tory MP claimed she lack's any empathy.
theeyeofmedia.com...

And this was echoed by an Expert.
www.msn.com...

Basically she fits the spectrum for a Sociopath of perhaps even has some form of Psychopathy BUT it could also mean borderline autism or Asperger's.

Basically it is my opinion that the sooner this nation is free of this unelected (by the Public) government the better off we shall be,.

I also believe that her plan's are to push through as much damage in the next two years as she can before the next general election and the almost dead set certainty of a coming Labour victory so that Labour will then be faced with having to spend most of it's term reversing policy and damage done by the Conservatives before it can even get down to the brass tack's of fixing our damaged nation.

a reply to: LABTECH767

Not a lot to add to that....about sums up her, her credibility and integrity.

a reply to: LABTECH767

You are seriously deluded if you think Labour will fix anything.Half of the problems are from policy made by Tony Blairs Labour,non of these policies were reversed by 12 years of a Conservative government.
Remember Sir Kneels mantra during the Covid scam= "lockdown harder,longer".
If only the Conservative party were actually conservative .
The Uniparty is what Britain has,Liberal globalists.
They don't want anything to improve for normal Brits but want us back to third word standards like the Africans they have flooded in since lockdown into nice no skill,no actual Labour jobs like security.
Nearly pissed myself that you actually believe Labour will spend time reversing big bad Tory policy,ha ha ha ha.
Bread and circuses still seems to work I see.

a reply to: Raggedyman
The left-wing media hate her already.
That ought to tell you that she and Biden are on opposite sides.

a reply to: glen200376

Sadly, as people are beginning to slowly realise, its a case of the least worse option.
A truly shocking state of affiars.

There is a case to support the theory that we get the government we deserve.
People have switched off and disengaged from the political process.
They feel completely alienated from it and there's certainly no-one who is prepared to stand up and even try to listen to what ordinary, everyday British people think and want let alone try and act in their best interests and wishes.

Ordinary British people are the single, biggest demographic in the country.....and the most under-represented and ignored.

I'm afraid until we actually do something about it nothing much is going to change.

a reply to: Raggedyman

Another adulterer in the top job.

Must be a requirement.

a reply to: nugget1

Does she have a drug addled daughter who sleeps with her dead sisters' husband?

Did she shower with her son?

a reply to: Freeborn

The English used to take care of business.

What happened?

originally posted by: glen200376
a reply to: LABTECH767

You are seriously deluded if you think Labour will fix anything.Half of the problems are from policy made by Tony Blairs Labour,non of these policies were reversed by 12 years of a Conservative government.
Remember Sir Kneels mantra during the Covid scam= "lockdown harder,longer".
If only the Conservative party were actually conservative .
The Uniparty is what Britain has,Liberal globalists.
They don't want anything to improve for normal Brits but want us back to third word standards like the Africans they have flooded in since lockdown into nice no skill,no actual Labour jobs like security.
Nearly pissed myself that you actually believe Labour will spend time reversing big bad Tory policy,ha ha ha ha.
Bread and circuses still seems to work I see.

Let me give you a little bit of History.

It was the Conservative party that started this internationalist bull going back, notably someone whom was tied with the very upper echelons of society the ruling class, the upper level of British freemasonry and the conservative party whom while acting as the Last Viceroy of India actually invited the Indians during partition to come and live with us, that man was Mountbatten the same whom it is rumoured liked little boy's a bit too much and whom the IRA later blew up on his boat over in the republic of ireland.

BUT both the Conservatives and Labour were complicit in this, it was destructive to the Labour party however and the Tory's riled in the fact that the Asian community's were growing - probably by design - within the working class homelands of the labour party and due to the fact they were just so different this broke up the unity that the OLD Labour party very much relied upon undermining it.

In error many former Labour voters then switched to the Tory's as they thought wrongly that this was all the fault of Labour BUT sadly Labour came to OWN this problem by there own inactivity in stopping it.

Not that I would blame the Asian community for this but you have to remember the politics of the time.

And despite were this came from there was one man whom has been wrongly tarred and feathered whom was definitely no NAZI whom tried to warn the people, he was actually old conservative and you will know his name all to well Enoch Powel whom - before he told a story about a widow whom had lost her son's and husband in the war and whom was then being terrorized by some pretty lawless Jamaicans (Not all Jamaicans were like this by any means but this group were and records have since been found that exonerate Powel from being the liar he was accused of being) that had moved in next door to her and were actively terrorising her - had before telling the people this in Parliament actually been in the running and the favourite to become the leader of the Conservative party.
www.dailymail.co.uk...

Then in the 1960's and the 1970's members of the Tory's (AKA the Conservatives but actually the real rulers of the conservatives whom we can safely call Tory's) plotted a coup against Harold Wilson's Government, they wanted to destroy it at any cost and were even in contact through MI5 (whom committed a crime in this and an act of treason in being part of a plot to oust the elected government of her majesty no matter whom was involved in the plot) with the CIA and gained there approval, something that was not difficult since the CIA had been party to several coup's in South America against moderate socialist governments whom had been voted in by various nations populations though they failed to displace a genuine soviet backed regime in Cuba and most of those they did destroy were simply pretty much like Labour here.
www.telesurenglish.net...

Not Pinochet and Margarette Thatchers great friendship with the Dictator, yes he was hand during the Falklands war but otherwise was an utterly despicable man and her being friends with him on a personal level should have sent shivers down your spine.

But then the whom debacle of attacking the Miners over here was not simple about destroying Labour though that was a big part of her action as she was trying to destroy Labours voter base even further, something Truss is planning to continue with her plan to OUTLAW strikes taking away the few vestigas of worker righs that still remain.

But back to that coup plot, among MI5 and probably the CIA or at least some cells of them that were tied to the Conservative party here and there like minded friends over in the US a plot was PROBABLY hatched to turn LABOUR into controlled opposition.

The Result was NEW LABOUR whom I have to say that it is my own humble opinion are NOT Labour but something else hence the reason so many of us call them Tory Light.

Our Democracy was basically stolen from us think about it.

N.B.

Predictably MI5 have released a report claiming there is no evidence of the coup plot against Wilson's government back in the 70's but they would as they were complicit in the matter but it was actually information obtained under the US freedom of information that blew the whole thing wide but sadly decades after and far too late to save Wilson's government.

I personally do not blame the CIA though they did give approval to the plot, they were in an Ideological war and had no real way of knowing that Labour was not there enemy's as the way our nation was run and the way there's was were pretty alien to one another despite our shared language and many shared values, over in the US lethal and definitely illegal force had been used from as early as the 1920's to suppress there own trade unions and those that remained were often just fronts for various Mafia crime syndicates and the money workers paid into them went then to the Mafia hoodlums and not back into society or political representation as it did with our trades unions many of whom could trace there origin's back to the 1800's and the start of British socialism which was actually NOT Marxism but rather Christian reformers though Atheist Marxism did eventually displace much of the more noble nature of that among many within the Labour party the very worst examples of which were the OTHER infiltrators of the Labour movement whom were actually genuine communists such as the more extreme members of Militant which was possibly born out of influence from the former soviet union and perhaps even paid for in part by them in the early 1980's.

Instead of helping to oust Thatcher Militant actually instead turned many moderate Labour voters away from Labour or simply stopped them voting at all much as New Labour did leaving a party that has lost it's way and has no identity.

Sadly what many miss is the fact that Corbyn was actually OLD Labour true to it's original policy's though not exactly since he was a bit too internationalist in his views albeit he was one one of the Corporate internationalists that own our party's, for that matter look how many Oligarch's funded the Tory's to PREVENT Corbyn getting into power, why?, maybe because him nationalizing our power and oil again would have put a crimper on there plans for cutting the tap off for Europe and taken it back into a FOR SERVICE model rather than FOR PROFIT.

originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: glen200376

Sadly, as people are beginning to slowly realise, its a case of the least worse option.
A truly shocking state of affiars.

There is a case to support the theory that we get the government we deserve.
People have switched off and disengaged from the political process.
They feel completely alienated from it and there's certainly no-one who is prepared to stand up and even try to listen to what ordinary, everyday British people think and want let alone try and act in their best interests and wishes.

Ordinary British people are the single, biggest demographic in the country.....and the most under-represented and ignored.

I'm afraid until we actually do something about it nothing much is going to change.

Absolutely true, non of them are fit to rule our nation, non of them are FOR our people OR for that matter our nation but are Glen200376 rightly points out tarred with the same brush, they are both party's of corrupt bought and paid for bribed under the table money taking swindlers that are only too happy to vote for pay rises and expenses increases for themselves and for cut's and poverty for the rest of us not on over fifty grand a year.

It's like they are actually our enemy's and we there prisoners.

originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: Raggedyman
The left-wing media hate her already.
That ought to tell you that she and Biden are on opposite sides.

Not saying they are on the same side, it’s more about competency for the roll

While I like Trump, his policies, capabilities and what he was able to accomplish, Trump was not a conventional/orthodox statesman
Not looking like Truss is competent or likeable

Compare her to Jacinta Arden in New Zealand, likeable but incompetent, Truss is incompetent and unliked from what the alternative media sources I read indicate and English friends are saying to me at the moment
Be interesting to see how she handles things in future

So, the UK is facing its worst economic recession in years.
We have the energy and cost of living crisis that is threatening to severely impact ordinary, everyday British people this winter.
Record numbers of people using Food Banks, inflation rising alarmingly, NHS crumbling, people scared to turn their heating on blah blah blah.
I'm sure we're all aware of the doom and gloom.

Record profits announced by energy companies and shareholders positively drooling over the prospect of bumper dividends.

What does our new PM suggest?
No, not a windfall tax on those greedy bastards.....
An increase in bonus payments for Bankers!
www.bbc.co.uk...

Anyone wondering about what sort of PM we now have should take heed.

a reply to: Freeborn

I guess it had to happen, the first Elizabeth is were the British Empire really started and this last Queen oversaw it's end.

The First Elizabeth saw the United Kingdom form when Scotland and England both shared her as monarch but this prime minister appointed (though it was just the queen performing her ceremonial duty and she was dying at the time that bruise on her hand was probably something to do with a drip and she had to get out of bed to perform those duties doing her best to her last) just day's before he died is now a curse on this nation, she will REALLY give the scot's reason to demand a new referendum and they may even hold an illegal one, they have there own parliament so they may unilaterally declare independence once enough people north of the border have had enough and given Truss obvious HATRED for the poor that won't be too long, expect this winter of discontent to see people dying like flies and her refusing to let go of power for as long as she can.

Now we have a king who put his children in plant pot's, who may have an illegitimate son (if it can be proven) to his current wife living in Australia and asking for a DNA sample from Charles to prove he is there son and a nation divided ever more between the have too much's and the have less than nothing at all's.

A prime minister that want's to strip away our right's and make us into neo medieval serf's.

Expect riot's worse than the 80's, especially since there are so many gun's in the hands of so many in deprived areas these days with crime having risen through migration and through lack of investment in those areas by over twelve years of Hooray Harry Tory Rule.

a reply to: LABTECH767

I don't think we're talking about the breakdown of The Union.....just yet.
I think far too many realise we are far, far stronger together and we have a better chance of forcing true change united.

As for Charlie and Camilla's 'love child'; I think other alleged illegitimate heirs have had better claims to the throne over the years.
I'd be amazed if anything comes of it.....but I guess we'll see.