It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Mark Steyn Questions Why Young Healthy People Are Dying Across The UK

page: 10
41
<< 7  8  9   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 2 2022 @ 09:48 AM
link   
I've done that, like I said before further back in the thread and it has nothing to do with pregancy....




Decision
Summary of the Public Assessment Report for COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech
Updated 16 August 2022




The Public Assessment Report summarises the initial assessment at the time of approval in December 2020. The text in the original report remains unchanged.

Our advice is regularly updated on the basis of significant new data and our latest advice can be found in the Summary of Product Characteristics on this page and the Summary of Coronavirus Yellow Card reporting.

This why people are getting confused, the update relates to another part of the webage that was updated...



She linked to a report from December 2020 which said, "reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time", because of an absence of data and that, "women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated".




Part of the confusion appeared to stem from the fact that a different part of the same webpage had been updated on 16 August 2022, to include some information about boosters.




A link to the outdated report was viewed across major social media platforms thousands of times, along with inaccurate claims including that the government had performed a "U-turn" and admitted the vaccine was "not safe for pregnant or breastfeeding women".


edit on 2-9-2022 by Kurokage because: (no reason given)

edit on 2-9-2022 by Kurokage because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 2 2022 @ 09:50 AM
link   
a reply to: Kurokage

What I think you are saying is, that it's not a fake report as such...the gov.uk had put it on their site by mistake by putting out an old version mixed with a new version?

It appears that confusion happened due to the fact that a different part of the same webpage had been updated on 16 August 2022, to include some information about boosters.

So there was confusion.......not a hoax.....nothing sinister.
edit on 2-9-2022 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 2 2022 @ 10:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: Kurokage

What I think you are saying is, that it's not a fake report as such...the gov.uk had put it on their site by mistake by putting out an old version mixed with a new version?

It appears that confusion happened due to the fact that a different part of the same webpage had been updated on 16 August 2022, to include some information about boosters.

So there was confusion.......not a hoax.


That's exactly what happened but then people were also snipping it and then reposting it. Sorry, I should have been clearer in my explanation of the situation.


edit on 2-9-2022 by Kurokage because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 2 2022 @ 11:11 AM
link   
Adverts on UK TV at moment for life insurance £100,000 for £8 per month

They ask are you a smoker but not vaccine status

How come life insurance is still available to those who have been jabbed/poisoned

I guess those that are vaccinated better get insured their is gonna be lots of rich people once their relatives die

Hope the insurance companies don’t catch on
edit on 000000p3011America/Chicago902202259 by UpThenDown because: Typo

edit on 000000p3011America/Chicago902202259 by UpThenDown because: Typo Never post from phone lol



posted on Sep, 2 2022 @ 12:06 PM
link   
a reply to: UpThenDown

That's nothing new, the UK has a lot of these kind of plans. Particularly the ones for over 50s. They're more noticeable in the UK most people traditionally depend on the state, so ads that go outside of the state system stand out more.

Given that the vast majority of seniors in the UK have been vaxed, it's not really worth asking, as the answer is almost always yes.

The fact that these companies don't seem bothered, and that they don't have exclusions for the vaxxed means that they think that it's safe and aren't anticipating any problems. Which should tell you something.



posted on Sep, 2 2022 @ 12:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: puzzled2
a reply to: AaarghZombies

confused what you think you've debunked - there are new recommendations. Have a listen and follow the links.
.




No, these are from early 2021, but with a new date stuck on the bottom. I linked to the current recommendations and they debunked you.



posted on Sep, 4 2022 @ 03:48 PM
link   
a reply to: AaarghZombies

strange your debunking nothing



Guidance
COVID-19 vaccination: women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
Information for women who are pregnant or breastfeeding on coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccination.

From:
UK Health Security Agency
Published
6 December 2020
Last updated
2 September 2022


Guidance
COVID-19 vaccination: women who are pregnant or breastfeeding


There's an update on September 2nd and you've debunked nothing. So squirm change the subject pretned its all not true as much as you want they did update the guidelines.



posted on Sep, 5 2022 @ 02:04 AM
link   
a reply to: AaarghZombies

The document in question is from December 2020......not early 2021......but it was mixed up with the gov.uk document posted in the 16 August 2022 update that was actually posted on the gov.uk website.

What does it say about pregnant women and breast feeding women in the December 2020 document?

Now tell me why pregnant women were first offered the injection in ........ December 2020?


Pregnant women were first offered the vaccine in December 2020, if they were health or care workers or in an at risk group. Since April 2021, pregnant women have been offered the vaccine as part of the standard age based rollout of the vaccination programme.

Link:
NHS encourages pregnant women to get COVID-19 vaccine
11 October 2021
CoronavirusMaternityNursing, midwifery and care


DECEMBER 3, 2020
This is misleading: the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), which advises the UK government, published a report on Dec. 3 saying it does not currently advise COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy, and that only children at very high risk of exposure and serious outcomes should be offered vaccination (here).

“There are no data as yet on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy, either from human or animal studies. Given the lack of evidence, JCVI favours a precautionary approach, and does not currently advise COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy,” the report says.
www.reuters.com...
edit on 5-9-2022 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 6 2022 @ 01:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: DeathSlayer
Many who took the jab know they messed up but cannot admit it. Their fear and ignorance continues.

Mark Steyn is either one of these idiots or acting dumb. Either way it feeds the media the wrong message.




a reply to: v1rtu0s0



Ive had 2 jabs and the booster (along with 7 other family members and an equally large number of extended family)... me and all of them are still here alive and kicking (and we all range from late 20's right up to people in their 80's). Also where are the anti vaxx who vehemently said we'd all be dead by now if we took the vaccine? (There were people on this very site a year or more ago stating all those who took the vaxx would be dead by now)...

Im still here a year latter... or is that 'there will be consequences' gonna be pushed out further and further like most predictions in CT?
edit on 6-9-2022 by BigfootNZ because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 6 2022 @ 04:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: BigfootNZ

originally posted by: DeathSlayer
Many who took the jab know they messed up but cannot admit it. Their fear and ignorance continues.

Mark Steyn is either one of these idiots or acting dumb. Either way it feeds the media the wrong message.




a reply to: v1rtu0s0



Ive had 2 jabs and the booster (along with 7 other family members and an equally large number of extended family)... me and all of them are still here alive and kicking (and we all range from late 20's right up to people in their 80's). Also where are the anti vaxx who vehemently said we'd all be dead by now if we took the vaccine? (There were people on this very site a year or more ago stating all those who took the vaxx would be dead by now)...

Im still here a year latter... or is that 'there will be consequences' gonna be pushed out further and further like most predictions in CT?


The people that said you'd all be dead right now were alarmists before the data was even available. They don't even know what vaccine you took, did you take them seriously? Perhaps we should relegate them to the corn fields with the rest of the straw men?

The data now shows the immune therapeutic is very ineffective and doesn't last, which isn't that bad except it also has a high rate of severe adverse effects. That is bad and it's bad enough to have recorded an astonishing number of adverse events compared to other vaccines. Probably so many more because all previous vaccine disasters were pulled before they reached this level of stupidity or were never approved through the established criteria that was tossed in the toilet for COVID vaccines.

You took a vaccine for a disease that has a very low mortality. It only takes a very low mortality from the vaccine to render any benefit received a net loss versus adverse events. The data has shown regional variance in vaccine composition, with certain batches having different doses and having more or less adverse events. Just because you and yours are fine doesn't mean that's the case for everyone and the success or failure is in aggregate. It's called public health. Your personal health seems to be fine from COVID "vaccination", but you alone do not make up the public.

I'm amazed people don't see the inherent selfishness of saying "well I'm fine". It's not just about you. It's about just one kid dying for a vaccine that provides them zero clinical benefit for a disease they are incredibly unlikely to get seriously ill from. It's about people with known issues that could be exacerbated by the vaccine, but the authorities are refusing to give informed consent to them about the real risks.

A disease that has a sub 1% mortality does not merit any unknown risks from a "vaccine" that doesn't prevent transmission or illness and has to be repeated, particularly in healthy young people or nearly anybody healthy under 50. Each booster will have the same or greater risk of causing adverse events, it's simple science. You get no real protection, have to expose yourself to risks they refuse to even make an effort to properly track, and you will have to continue doing it because the "vaccine" substantially limits your ability to fight new variants. Now each variant will have an equally late and ineffective booster.
edit on 9/6/22 by Ksihkehe because: Typo



posted on Sep, 10 2022 @ 03:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ksihkehe

originally posted by: BigfootNZ

originally posted by: DeathSlayer
Many who took the jab know they messed up but cannot admit it. Their fear and ignorance continues.

Mark Steyn is either one of these idiots or acting dumb. Either way it feeds the media the wrong message.




a reply to: v1rtu0s0



Ive had 2 jabs and the booster (along with 7 other family members and an equally large number of extended family)... me and all of them are still here alive and kicking (and we all range from late 20's right up to people in their 80's). Also where are the anti vaxx who vehemently said we'd all be dead by now if we took the vaccine? (There were people on this very site a year or more ago stating all those who took the vaxx would be dead by now)...

Im still here a year latter... or is that 'there will be consequences' gonna be pushed out further and further like most predictions in CT?


The people that said you'd all be dead right now were alarmists before the data was even available. They don't even know what vaccine you took, did you take them seriously? Perhaps we should relegate them to the corn fields with the rest of the straw men?

The data now shows the immune therapeutic is very ineffective and doesn't last, which isn't that bad except it also has a high rate of severe adverse effects. That is bad and it's bad enough to have recorded an astonishing number of adverse events compared to other vaccines. Probably so many more because all previous vaccine disasters were pulled before they reached this level of stupidity or were never approved through the established criteria that was tossed in the toilet for COVID vaccines.

You took a vaccine for a disease that has a very low mortality. It only takes a very low mortality from the vaccine to render any benefit received a net loss versus adverse events. The data has shown regional variance in vaccine composition, with certain batches having different doses and having more or less adverse events. Just because you and yours are fine doesn't mean that's the case for everyone and the success or failure is in aggregate. It's called public health. Your personal health seems to be fine from COVID "vaccination", but you alone do not make up the public.

I'm amazed people don't see the inherent selfishness of saying "well I'm fine". It's not just about you. It's about just one kid dying for a vaccine that provides them zero clinical benefit for a disease they are incredibly unlikely to get seriously ill from. It's about people with known issues that could be exacerbated by the vaccine, but the authorities are refusing to give informed consent to them about the real risks.

A disease that has a sub 1% mortality does not merit any unknown risks from a "vaccine" that doesn't prevent transmission or illness and has to be repeated, particularly in healthy young people or nearly anybody healthy under 50. Each booster will have the same or greater risk of causing adverse events, it's simple science. You get no real protection, have to expose yourself to risks they refuse to even make an effort to properly track, and you will have to continue doing it because the "vaccine" substantially limits your ability to fight new variants. Now each variant will have an equally late and ineffective booster.


This deserves its own thread.



posted on Sep, 11 2022 @ 06:44 AM
link   
a reply to: v1rtu0s0




This deserves its own thread.


Yeah, ATS still has the HOAX forum.

Here's a link for you...

ATS HOAX.

Actually most of the threads you post could go on there or even ask for a Doom Porn area to be added!

edit on 11-9-2022 by Kurokage because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 27 2023 @ 08:36 PM
link   
2.27.2023

For those who remember MARK STEYN, he's been silent over the past several months, because of 2 (TWO!) Covid-19 VACCINE-INDUCED HEART ATTACKS.

Source: truthsocial.com...

What a tragedy.

Maybe the Covid-19 lab leak was an accident.

But the negative/adverse health events associated with the Pfizer Covid vaccine certainly isn't!

P.S. Congress knew: www.foxnews.com...

Lots of Pharmaceutical and Government indictments and lawsuits are needed!




posted on Feb, 27 2023 @ 09:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
2.27.2023

For those who remember MARK STEYN, he's been silent over the past several months, because of 2 (TWO!) Covid-19 VACCINE-INDUCED HEART ATTACKS.

Source: truthsocial.com...

What a tragedy.

Maybe the Covid-19 lab leak was an accident.

But the negative/adverse health events associated with the Pfizer Covid vaccine certainly isn't!

P.S. Congress knew: www.foxnews.com...

Lots of Pharmaceutical and Government indictments and lawsuits are needed!




It's going to be slow wave of illness and death for the next 10 years. Sad to hear about Mark, but he has done God's work.



posted on Mar, 6 2023 @ 02:45 AM
link   
a reply to: v1rtu0s0


And there it is. Exactly the opposite of what anti-vaxxers were saying in 2020 - 2021.

As I stated before, if anti-vaxxers were telling the truth we would all be going to about 4 Funerals a week by now. I would be run off my feet at the mortuary.

Especially since they had already told people somehow ALL of them had about 7 friends who died soon after the jab.

( Which of course turned out to be a massive lie. All fabricated to scare-monger people Like some strange doomsday cult )



Now as predicted like all non truth seekers ( I actually admire those who are real truth seekers, who ask questions and do not just believe the MSM or Govts etc...) But those people have standards, if their alternative theory is debunked, they have no issue stating it. What they DO NOT do is change their prediction to suit reality.

" It's going to be slow wave of illness and death for the next 10 years "


Nice try but no. Just too predictable.



new topics

top topics



 
41
<< 7  8  9   >>

log in

join