Smoking Gun: Vascular And Organ Damage Induced By mRNA Vaccines: Irrefutable Proof Of Causality

In my opinion, this is the "mic-drop" moment showing causality of the mRNA vaccines to cause adverse effects and death. Doctors4covidethics recently published an article that is the compilation of studies from autopsies of deceased vaccinated individuals. The central body of work was provided by Professor Arne Burkhardt who is a pathologist based in Reutlingen Germany. Burkhardt has been studying the bodies of those who were vaccinated because the families of the deceased requested it. Overall he discovered the majority of deaths were caused by the mRNA vaccines.

Who are doctors4covidethics?

We are hundreds of doctors and scientists from all corners of the globe. We have written three letters to the European Medicines Agency, urgently warning of short term and long term dangers from COVID-19 vaccines, including clotting, bleeding and platelet abnormalities. We first began warning of blood-related risks before media reports of clotting led to vaccine suspensions around the world.

The criteria they used to determine mRNA vaccines cause vascular and organ damage:

1. mRNA vaccines don’t stay at the injection site by instead travel throughout the body and accumulate in various organs,
2. mRNA-based COVID vaccines induce long-lasting expression of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in many organs,
3. vaccine-induced expression of the spike protein induces autoimmune-like inflammation,
4. vaccine-induced inflammation can cause grave organ damage, especially in vessels, sometimes with deadly outcome.

Why was this evidence gathered?

Dr. Burkhardt was approached by the families of patients deceased after “vaccination.”

One of the images that stood out to me shows the inside of an arterial wall completely covered by spike proteins making it a huge target for the immune system to attack. In this picture immunohistology was used to identify the s1 spike proteins, seen in brown. It has been observed that the spike protein rapidly leaves the injection site and travels through the bodies via the bloodstream. If the spike proteins covers the vascular walls through the body, it can be easy to see how there could be potential for be clots, strokes, micro clots and organ damage. A previous study showed t-cell infiltration of the cardiac tissue post mRNA vaccination. This would obviously destroy heart cells and cause a myriad of cardiac related conditions.



The 14 areas of evidence:

1. Most of the evidence presented here is from the work of pathologist Prof. Arne Burkhardt, MD
2. Pfizer’s own animal experiments show that the vaccine quickly distributes throughout the body
3. Expression of viral proteins can be detected with immunohistochemistry
4. Expression of spike protein in shoulder muscle after vaccine injection
5. Coronavirus particles contain two prominent proteins: spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N)
6. Infected persons express the nucleocapsid protein (and also the spike protein)
7. Injected persons express only the spike protein, which implicates the vaccine
8. Expression of spike protein within the walls of small blood vessels
9. Endothelial stripping and destruction of a small blood vessel after vaccination
10. A crack in the wall of the aorta, lined by clusters of lymphocytes, leading to aortic rupture
11. Healthy heart muscle tissue, and lymphocytic myocarditis
12. Lymphocytic infiltration and proliferative inflammation in lung tissue
13. Vaccine-induced expression of spike protein in a bronchial biopsy nine months after vaccination
14. The Pfizer vaccine mRNA gets copied (“reverse-transcribed”) into DNA and inserted into the cellular genome

The conclusions was reached that the vaccines are causing the deaths in the majority of the victims autopsied.

Based on the findings, most deaths were attributed to “vaccination” with a high to very high degree of likelihood.

Furthermore, the following adverse effects can be caused by the mRNA vaccines:

In addition to autoimmune-like inflammation, other disease mechanisms, including prion-mediated CNS degeneration [13], aberrant vascular protein deposition (amyloidosis) [14,15], and lipid nanoparticle toxicity [16], are plausible but require further study and corroboration. Overall, these vaccines can no longer be considered experimental—the “experiment” has resulted in the disaster that many medical doctors and scientists predicted from the outset [17]. The vaccination must be stopped, and all approvals and authorizations of their use must be revoked.

I believe the massive increase in all cause mortality occurring globally but specifically in highly vaccinated countries, the epidemic of "SADS" which is the leading cause of death in some places now, and the vindication that databases like VAERs are under counting legitimate cases of adverse effects and deaths caused by the mRNA vaccines can be proven with an autopsy using the same methodologies as the doctors used in these studies. People who are living can use thermography to determine if they have these micro clots as noted in a previous ATS thread. This image shows how micro clotting could be identified in a vaccinated individual:



SOURCE

Irrefutable proof?

Arguably not:

www.reuters.com...

Rage away.....

Hmm

The virus can cause these effects if the person's innate immune system does not destroy it quickly too. But over eighty percent of people...mostly the younger population....have immunity to the coronavirus cold and adenovirus cold so they can build slow immunity to the spike protein while getting a small case of sickness for a few days. This immunity builds with subsequent mild infections.

Injecting the mRNA of the spike protein into the arm can cause some bad effects in some people that would have probably not have had these effects if they got the virus and fought it off with the coronavirus cold immunity.

This opinion I have is from reading a lot of research on both sides of the issue. The vaccine might benefit the old and immune compromised pretty much but not the healthy people so much.

A vaccine that has caused this much problems as this one has should never have been approved for wide spread use, maybe it should have just been given to high risk people and let everyone else get natural immunity from it.

I read too much research and evaluate it by comparing it to each other to find a rational solution to things. So this is my opinion, and opinions differ. Yes, being cautious of a new disease is good, but after six months of caution, they had enough research to identify people's risk and knew what food chemistries were active against this virus. But they promoted fear and started twisting evidence to make their jobs more secure and to gain prestige...not good in my opinion.

a reply to: jtrenthacker

The good Doctor seems to have lied about his qualifications.

Well, OP, your comments?



"Bhakdi describes himself as a professor emeritus of medical microbiology and immunology at the Johannes Gutenberg University (JGU) of Mainz on the group’s website.

However, in October 2020, the university issued a statement clarifying that it has not granted emeritus positions since 1978. The statement went on to say Bhakdi “is a retired professor and was not granted membership rights to the JGU and its University Medical School upon his retirement.”

Irrefutable proof?

By a known liar?

Do you ever check your sources before posting them?

Especially when you try to tell ATS that it is "irrefutable proof"?

Obviously not.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

The good news is that everyone who did their own research, is exempt from these Quackcine™ side-effects.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

1. mRNA vaccines don’t stay at the injection site by instead travel throughout the body and accumulate in various organs,

I know I will get labled a bot/sock puppet but perhaps the doc needed a bot himself, a spelling bot, it could also be a translation error as I am not sure who typed it but surely it should have been proof read, wonder if they will pay me to do it for them

surely the underlined part is a typo and should be 'but'

I am not suggesting anything else about the veracity of the evidence, I am not a doctor, I am merely pointing out a spelling/grammar error

carry on

a reply to: Nothin

Do your own research into the OP's Quacksource?

Like, a Dr that even lies about his qualifications?

So according to this evidence, wouldn't catching COVID have the same side-effects?

a reply to: darkbake

Is there a difference from catching it naturally and having it injected into you?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

They would say that, wouldn't they? Here you go attacking the messenger instead of looking to see if the message was true or not.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

There doesn't seem to be any blurring of the lines left. You either think the vaccine was the greatest invention since the wheel or are convinced it comes with inherent dangers.

I remember when all the pro-vaxers believed it would prevent catching C19 100%, and were shaming everybody who wasn't rushing out to get the jab. Then it quietly morphed into 'you'll still get it but you won't get as sick'.

It's been interesting to watch things evolve and the talking heads scramble to keep covid relevant.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
Irrefutable proof?

Arguably not:

www.reuters.com...

Rage away.....

A fact checking company with Pfizer board members on its board says jabs are good.

Sounds legit

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

In New South Wales 33 of the double vaxed dies compared to 3 unvaxed , and it is simply because they didn't get their boosters. So common folks let's hit the sales targets and get that booster you know it's the right thing to do. If you don't it will all go pie shaped. We have to depopulate and the government thanks you from their heart for doing the right thing. www.bitchute.com...

originally posted by: Lemon1234
a reply to: darkbake

Is there a difference from catching it naturally and having it injected into you?

There are vastly more spike proteins generated from the mRNA vaccines and they are also disconnected from the virus. They also travel to areas of the body that a respiratory infection would never go via the LNPs.

originally posted by: NorthOfStuff

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
Irrefutable proof?

Arguably not:

www.reuters.com...

Rage away.....

A fact checking company with Pfizer board members on its board says jabs are good.

Sounds legit

Correct, they are one of the worst offenders as far as "fact checking."

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

They would say that, wouldn't they? Here you go attacking the messenger instead of looking to see if the message was true or not.

You'd think they'd learn after we pointed it our several 100 times already.

I found most of that information over a year ago. No one would give it any consideration then, I doubt many will now. It was considered far out conspiracy theory by most, even with all the sources I drilled down to in order to verify the findings. Glad to see that information is getting support by a fresh look from a different approach than a year ago.

Personally I was pretty convinced by spring of of 2021 of most of what this report is stating now. I agree that autopsy studies are the smoking gun even though it was put out there over a year ago through different studies.

S&F

But wait, there's more!

Since late last year, messenger RNA for Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccines, including its recently reformulated Omicron booster, has been exclusively manufactured by a little known company with significant ties to US intelligence.
....
the reformulated vaccine combines the previously approved COVID-19 vaccine with a “vaccine candidate” targeting the Omicron variant BA.1. That vaccine candidate has never been previously approved and has not been the subject of independent study. The MHRA approved the vaccine based on a single, incomplete human trial currently being conducted by Moderna. The company promoted incomplete data from that trial in company press releases in June and July. The study has yet to be published in a medical journal or peer reviewed.
Moderna has also noted that approval for its Omicron booster vaccine are pending in the US, EU, Australia and Canada – all of which are also planning fall vaccination campaigns focused on COVID-19. The company’s CEO, Stéphane Bancel, has called the reformulated vaccine “our lead candidate for a Fall 2022 booster.”
National Resilience was founded relatively recently, in November 2020, and describes itself as “a manufacturing and technology company dedicated to broadening access to complex medicines and protecting biopharmaceutical supply chains against disruption.” It has since been building “a sustainable network of high-tech, end-to-end manufacturing solutions with the aim to ensure the medicines of today and tomorrow can be made quickly, safely, and at scale.” It furtherplans to “reinvent biomanufacturing” and “democratize access to medicines,” namely gene therapies, experimental vaccines and other “medicines of tomorrow.”

Just a little something more to chew on.

[unlimitedhangout.com...]