It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Announced today. Formation of a new third political party. The Forward Party

page: 4
16
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 28 2022 @ 01:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: TerryMcGuire

Anyone remember the tea party?


They got infiltrated and sabotaged by The NWO 😨



posted on Jul, 28 2022 @ 02:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
Today, Andrew Yang officially announced a coalition third party to hopefully take on the current stalemate of the two party system.

frontier.yahoo.com...



Wed, July 27, 2022 at 3:36 PM


LOS ANGELES (Reuters) -Dozens of former Republican and Democratic officials announced on Wednesday a new national political third party to appeal to millions of voters they say are dismayed with what they see as America's dysfunctional two-party system.

The new party, called Forward and whose creation was first reported by Reuters, will initially be co-chaired by former Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang and Christine Todd Whitman, the former Republican governor of New Jersey. They hope the party will become a viable alternative to the Republican and Democratic parties that dominate U.S. politics, founding members told Reuters.


Maybe and maybe not, this new party will catch the wave of popularity and will be able to offer a viable candidate and platform for 2024
Regardless of what any here might think of any of the announced names, they are well known names and will very possibly gain momentum over the next two years.



Not the first time a fusion party has been attempted and I believe the endeavor is long overdue. The concept of triumviracy typically refers to a governing apparatus that shares leadership but in this case, it's most useful for the competitive edge that would force the exhaustive bicyclic ideologies to earn or lose their prestige.



posted on Jul, 29 2022 @ 08:36 AM
link   
Theres plenty of party alternatives to the big 2 now. The big 2 are the only ones that have real power and this won’t change.

a reply to: TerryMcGuire



posted on Jul, 29 2022 @ 09:51 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

…but it is in a pretty box now. With a ribbon.


But yes there are plenty of third parties to waste a vote on: Green Party, Libertarian, Constitution Party, Citizens Party, Communist Party USA, Socialist Party USA, Peace and Freedom Party. There are state parties like NY’s The Rent Is Too Damn High Party. And there is even a group that is rather exclusive to Cincinnati, Ohio called the Charter Committee (aka Charter Party).There are various single issue parties like Pot Legalization and Abortions (pro and con).

There are also parties that make all the above look like carefree, easy living with playful jabs between one another, including the R’s and D’s. And I’m not going to even mention the hate wagons but race plays a big part on all sides.



posted on Jul, 29 2022 @ 11:56 AM
link   

edit on 29-7-2022 by TzarChasm because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 29 2022 @ 08:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
Today, Andrew Yang officially announced a coalition third party to hopefully take on the current stalemate of the two party system.

frontier.yahoo.com...



Wed, July 27, 2022 at 3:36 PM


LOS ANGELES (Reuters) -Dozens of former Republican and Democratic officials announced on Wednesday a new national political third party to appeal to millions of voters they say are dismayed with what they see as America's dysfunctional two-party system.

The new party, called Forward and whose creation was first reported by Reuters, will initially be co-chaired by former Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang and Christine Todd Whitman, the former Republican governor of New Jersey. They hope the party will become a viable alternative to the Republican and Democratic parties that dominate U.S. politics, founding members told Reuters.


Maybe and maybe not, this new party will catch the wave of popularity and will be able to offer a viable candidate and platform for 2024
Regardless of what any here might think of any of the announced names, they are well known names and will very possibly gain momentum over the next two years.



The Third party has always taken from the Party who needs to win and that is the Republicans. They have got to stop this intentional internal combustion. We will not make it to the next Presidential election at this rate. Obama and clueless Biden along with the suckers in Congress must be stopped at all cost.

Obama is getting everything destroyed in a hurry as if he is on a set timeline!!!!



posted on Jul, 29 2022 @ 08:33 PM
link   
So this is where our $8,00 is going to come from?

you know, the one Biden said we already got.



posted on Jul, 29 2022 @ 08:35 PM
link   
Sadly, this will go nowhere.

2 party gridlock is a built-in feature, not a bug.

Look up who runs all of the POTUS debate committees, election panels, and all of the gateway infrastructure to electing politicians.



posted on Jul, 30 2022 @ 12:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: Wookiefoot1312
I fail to see how they will get anywhere with the elections being rigged and the insane amount of donations the leftDemocrats and rightRepublicans get. Honestly just seems like more political theater to me. I would like to read more just for laughs



FTFY
edit on 30-7-2022 by AutomateThis1v2 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 30 2022 @ 12:36 AM
link   
Honestly. UBI is going to be a thing in the future whether you like it or not. That is unless the whole system comes crashing down.



posted on Jul, 30 2022 @ 01:28 AM
link   
I didn’t read all the posts in the thread but I’m wondering if anyone else here remembers the term
“forward” being bandied about during the obama dynasty...yah I sure did the moment I saw this thread about Andrew Yang’s new Forward Party. I’m sure it just screams communism to all Andrew’s fav fellow travelers. m.washingtontimes.com...



posted on Jul, 30 2022 @ 07:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: greendust
Ross Perot made sense a long time ago. Andrew does not. Quite a few of his positions (in my opinion) will only serve to empower terribly evil people due to his childlike hippy logic.
And the two parties we have now don’t serve evil ?



posted on Jul, 30 2022 @ 07:55 AM
link   
I really don't see this taking off for the simple fact that Yang just isn't big enough. I know he has fans, but I just don't think he has enough.

I've said it before, what it would take to really shake up the two-party system is a well-established cult of personality figure to break off and run as a 3rd party, like Trump or Bernie Sanders.

It would be especially effective if one from each side did it in the same election, because then voters wouldn't have to be as worried about their 3rd party vote helping the "other" side win.



posted on Jul, 30 2022 @ 12:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: InnerSpeciesPredator

originally posted by: greendust
Ross Perot made sense a long time ago. Andrew does not. Quite a few of his positions (in my opinion) will only serve to empower terribly evil people due to his childlike hippy logic.
And the two parties we have now don’t serve evil ?

Hmmmm childlike hippy logic, and here I was thinking the whole universal basic income thing was just all childlike Marxist utopian thinking ... same thing I guess.
edit on 30-7-2022 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 30 2022 @ 02:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: face23785
I really don't see this taking off for the simple fact that Yang just isn't big enough. I know he has fans, but I just don't think he has enough.

I've said it before, what it would take to really shake up the two-party system is a well-established cult of personality figure to break off and run as a 3rd party, like Trump or Bernie Sanders.

It would be especially effective if one from each side did it in the same election, because then voters wouldn't have to be as worried about their 3rd party vote helping the "other" side win.


I think it's been demonstrated that the "Swamp", entrenched political interests from ~BOTH~ sides, don't tolerate outsiders applying normal, non-upside down clown logic to governance. Trump certainly had some bones rattling around in his closet with shady real-estate deals and womanizing in his past, but being objective, has there EVER been a more intense, coordinated, media-lead psyop to invalidate and harden public sentiment against a sitting POTUS?

Saying things like:
- close the Southern border
- limit aid to foreign countries that in fact is many times is corruption fodder (billion$ for 'gender studies' in Afghanistan? o_O)
- question the need, and funding level, for NATO

The questioning of NATO and the scrutiny on where foreign aid was likely enough to trigger the "Swamp".




top topics



 
16
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join