It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: vonclod
originally posted by: RussianTroll
a reply to: CriticalStinker
You didn't have any referenda at all. Not before the invasion, not after the invasion. Dictatorship.
Dictatorship...
How long has Putin decided he will be in power?
originally posted by: RussianTroll
Hello ATS!
Yesterday, a new statement by Russian President Putin was made, which must have greatly strained the world community. After all, she managed to forget about the Russian “ultimatum” published on December 17, 2021.
Vladimir Putin at a meeting with the leaders of the factions of the State Duma said:
"Today we hear that they want to defeat us on the battlefield, well, what can I say, let them try. We have heard many times that the West wants to fight us to the last Ukrainian. This is a tragedy for the Ukrainian people, but it seems that everything This is what it goes for. But everyone should know that, by and large, we haven’t started anything seriously yet."
Someone may have thought that we are talking about a new qualitative content of the special operation. Perhaps about the liberation of Kharkov, Kyiv, Odessa and other regions of Ukraine from the Nazi Bandera regime. And, there is no doubt, it will be so - a matter of time.
But let me remind you that the "ultimatum" was about more - about the return of NATO to the borders of 1997. At least this is how this demand was interpreted by Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov.
“NATO needs to pack up and go to the 1997 lines,” he said on the eve of Russian-American negotiations on security guarantees and a month and a half before the start of the special operation in Ukraine.
To understand what borders Russia is talking about, the BBC even drew a map.
So, Russia is demanding the exclusion from NATO of new members admitted to the Alliance after 1997? No, Russia does not offer anything impossible, Ryabkov's words about the baggies are nothing more than a figure of speech. This is what is said in Article 4 of the draft "Agreement on measures to ensure the security of the Russian Federation and the member states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization", published on December 17 last year on the website of the Russian Foreign Ministry.
"The Russian Federation and all Participants that were, as of May 27, 1997, Member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, respectively, do not station their armed forces and armaments on the territory of all other states of Europe in addition to the forces stationed on that territory as of May 27 May 1997. In exceptional cases, when situations arise that require the neutralization of a threat to the security of one or more Participants, such placements may be carried out with the consent of all Participants".
That is, neither in the Baltics nor in other countries of Eastern Europe should there be any NATO troops, bases or launchers that could pose a threat to Russia's security. For example, the construction of elements of the Euro missile defense system in Eastern Europe - Poland, the Czech Republic, Romania - should be stopped, and what has already been started should be dismantled. But let them stay in NATO, for Russia this is not a problem. As well as membership in the alliance of Finland and Sweden, if military infrastructure is not deployed on the territory of these countries.
So, after the completion of the special operation in Ukraine, a special operation will begin in the Baltic States, Poland, the Czech Republic and further down the list? Personally, I do not exclude this - the Russians have nothing to lose. But I hope that by that time the Europeans will have accumulated enough willpower to put pressure on the Poles and the Balts and nip their militaristic frenzy in the bud.
And most importantly, they will begin to actively resist the United States and Britain, pushing the Old World to another military disaster. In the end, they must understand that they are talking about their own lives.
And at the end, a little joke addressed to a respected members of my "British fan club".
Thanks.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
I see all the people here that are just being tribal. They cheer and say we will keep sending weapons. Ukraine will never give up. They will take back all the land. Blah blah blah.
None of them will go over and help the fight. It isn't that important to them.
If half the people that tell everyone else they need to suffer 5 to $7 a gallon went and fought then Russia would lose. They won't.
That is, neither in the Baltics nor in other countries of Eastern Europe should there be any NATO troops, bases or launchers that could pose a threat to Russia's security. For example, the construction of elements of the Euro missile defense system in Eastern Europe - Poland, the Czech Republic, Romania - should be stopped,
I see all the people here that are just being tribal. They cheer and say we will keep sending weapons. Ukraine will never give up. They will take back all the land. Blah blah blah.
None of them will go over and help the fight. It isn't that important to them.
If half the people that tell everyone else they need to suffer 5 to $7 a gallon went and fought then Russia would lose. They won't.
"how can you complain about people not going off to fight in Ukraine when in the next breath you are perfectly happy to see prisoners of war called mercenaries and when captured charged with the death penalty?"