Conversation with Pfizer Chief Executive Officer Albert Bourla at Davos

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: vNex92

People like you obviously don't understand basic economics because if you did you'd realize no business wants less customers.

That's setting aside that what you claimed is pure bull.

The WEF doesn't want 'customers'
They want easily controlled and mind manipulated minions (slaves) who will own nothing and be 'happy'

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

If you honestly believe that the WEF are working towards a much better world you are free to believe whatever you prefer.

If you prefer the same group of elitists that expect you to eat bugs.
Why we need to give insects the role they deserve in our food systems

no business wants less customers

If you believe globalists have the good heart of humanity by all means believe it.

originally posted by: ancientlight
The WEF doesn't want 'customers'

Like I said, only people who don't understand basic economics say things like this. No business wants less customers and a lower population also means less revenue for governments.

They want easily controlled and mind manipulated minions (slaves) who will own nothing and be 'happy'

How do they pay to take care of all these people? With magic internet woo money?

originally posted by: vNex92
If you honestly believe that the WEF are working towards a much better world you are free to believe whatever you prefer.

I honestly believe you don't understand basic economics and you lied in your Original Post.

If you believe globalists have the good heart of humanity by all means believe it.

Duh. The only reason a company goes global is to get more customers.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: ancientlight
The WEF doesn't want 'customers'

Like I said, only people who don't understand basic economics say things like this. No business wants less customers and a lower population also means less revenue for governments.

They want easily controlled and mind manipulated minions (slaves) who will own nothing and be 'happy'

How do they pay to take care of all these people? With magic internet woo money?

They're not a business and you are unable to grasp the concept of what they want. But then again your goal is just to troll.

a reply to: StoutBroux
The line in title is not a lie, it is incomplete. Why is hearing those guys reminding me of the Sum of All Fears.
The real European elite are compromised with lifetime closet NAZIS.

So where does he say he wants to reduce the population by 50%?

All I heard was him saying he wants to make medicine affordable to the bottom 50% of people who cannot afford medicine... or let me guess, that's a ploy to give death pills to the poor or something?

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
They're not a business...

Pfizer is not a business? Oh, wait, this is coming from the guy who told us all they were going to be delisted four months ago. That ever happen E.F. Hutton?

originally posted by: strongfp
So where does he say he wants to reduce the population by 50%?

He doesn't, but that's all part of the Order 66 Eat Bugs Until We Depop You And Have Nothing Agenda 2030-ish.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

honestly believe you don't understand basic economics

Pfizer are sure the good guys when it comes of helping our economics right? they had being helping our economy right?

a reply to: strongfp

It starts at 2:40 well claims those who cant afford their medicine "Pfizer with quite track record" the population would be reduced.

You must be new to this whole WEF talk eh?

originally posted by: vNex92
Pfizer are sure the good guys when it comes of helping our economics right?

Where did I say anything about good or bad? I said they would never want less customers. Try reading what I say first before making these hyperbolic replies.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: ancientlight
The WEF doesn't want 'customers'

Like I said, only people who don't understand basic economics say things like this. No business wants less customers and a lower population also means less revenue for governments.

They want easily controlled and mind manipulated minions (slaves) who will own nothing and be 'happy'

How do they pay to take care of all these people? With magic internet woo money?

I understand 'basic economics' very well. These people are deranged psychopathic loons, they want TOTAL CONTROL over the world population.
We will OWN NOTHING and be happy. Guess who will own everything then ?

Oh that's right! The 'elites'. They will own everything, EVERYTHING . A bit slow maybe?
Customers

They will 'pay' in enough food to live and a mattress on the floor in dirty corner. Get it now ?!
Unless we all wake up and revolt, that's our future.

"we will reduce the number of people who can't afford our medicine by 50 percent"

That's not population reduction, that's cost reduction. FFS

originally posted by: ancientlight
I understand 'basic economics' very well.

You don't if you think there is an agenda to have less people and still have a growing economy.

They will 'pay' in enough food to live and a mattress on the floor in dirty corner. Get it now ?!

No, I don't 'get it'. Who pays for it and with what?

FFS, it must me incredibly oppressive to be this paranoid.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: ancientlight
I understand 'basic economics' very well.

You don't if you think there is an agenda to have less people and still have a growing economy.

They will 'pay' in enough food to live and a mattress on the floor in dirty corner. Get it now ?!

No, I don't 'get it'. Who pays for it and with what?

FFS, it must me incredibly oppressive to be this paranoid.

There will be no 'money' anymore only a digital 'currency' that's really a point system to buy food , or maybe have a light on for an hour (social credit score) It will be dismal hell.
The minions will be producing 99% items for the 'elite's , 1% for us (basics only).

originally posted by: ancientlight
There will be no 'money' anymore only a digital 'currency'...

Possibly one the biggest oxymorons I've ever seen and an absolutely glaring example of how little you know about economics.

The minions will be producing 99% items for the 'elite's , 1% for us (basics only).

Sure, that makes total sense, have a giant population and all the attendant infrastructure to produce goods for a small group of people who could not sustain the manufacturing process and costs.

Once again you fail miserably at economics. What you basically do is parrot various pieces of conspiracy woo you hear and then smash it all together into some sort of grand plan that cannot function on a prima facia level.

a reply to: vNex92

I think you miss understood. Which is understandable, I watch a lot of the WEF talks and have read a lot of material by some of its top contributors and they aren't the best at marketing or PR when they talk about things.

Put it in other words.
They want to increase the amount of people who cannot afford medicine by 50%. The choice of words was poor, but they want to sound impactful like "reducing green house gases" or something.

Think of it this way. If you have 100 people who are illiterate, and you teach 50 of them to read and write, you have reduced the illiterate population by 50%.

Pfizer, wants to take a product, distribute it to certain demographics, at a lower exchange rate than what it usually goes for, to a certain consumer base, which will then reduce the population of who cannot afford medicine by 50%.
Not literally reduce the population, but reduce it economically, and financially.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: ancientlight
There will be no 'money' anymore only a digital 'currency'...

Possibly one the biggest oxymorons I've ever seen and an absolutely glaring example of how little you know about economics.

The minions will be producing 99% items for the 'elite's , 1% for us (basics only).

Sure, that makes total sense, have a giant population and all the attendant infrastructure to produce goods for a small group of people who could not sustain the manufacturing process and costs.

Once again you fail miserably at economics. What you basically do is parrot various pieces of conspiracy woo you hear and then smash it all together into some sort of grand plan that cannot function on a prima facia level.

Then why are they working on creating a 'social credit score' ? Hmm? A 'growing economy' as you say, needs people being able to buy/sell what they want, when they want. Which a 'social credit score' certainly does not do !
You would only be allowed to buy certain 'essential' items on a positive score.
They (the 'elites') want to create this dystopian system to have total control over the global population.
Yes, they will fail miserably, society may collapse etc, but they are still actively trying to get this going.

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: vNex92

I think you miss understood. Which is understandable, I watch a lot of the WEF talks and have read a lot of material by some of its top contributors and they aren't the best at marketing or PR when they talk about things.

Put it in other words.
They want to increase the amount of people who cannot afford medicine by 50%. The choice of words was poor, but they want to sound impactful like "reducing green house gases" or something.

Think of it this way. If you have 100 people who are illiterate, and you teach 50 of them to read and write, you have reduced the illiterate population by 50%.

Pfizer, wants to take a product, distribute it to certain demographics, at a lower exchange rate than what it usually goes for, to a certain consumer base, which will then reduce the population of who cannot afford medicine by 50%.
Not literally reduce the population, but reduce it economically, and financially.

It's how you look at it. A reduction of the world population would also bring the same result. You have to agree that they 'people' are sick, they are psychopathic narcs certainly not looking out for our best interests , that's laughable.
So why are they soooo concerned about 'making sure' that the poor will be able to afford big pharma candy ?